Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Counterfactual quantum computation through quantum interrogation

Nature volume 439, pages 949–952 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

The logic underlying the coherent nature of quantum information processing often deviates from intuitive reasoning, leading to surprising effects. Counterfactual computation constitutes a striking example: the potential outcome of a quantum computation can be inferred, even if the computer is not run1. Relying on similar arguments to interaction-free measurements2 (or quantum interrogation3), counterfactual computation is accomplished by putting the computer in a superposition of ‘running’ and ‘not running’ states, and then interfering the two histories. Conditional on the as-yet-unknown outcome of the computation, it is sometimes possible to counterfactually infer information about the solution. Here we demonstrate counterfactual computation, implementing Grover's search algorithm with an all-optical approach4. It was believed that the overall probability of such counterfactual inference is intrinsically limited1,5, so that it could not perform better on average than random guesses. However, using a novel ‘chained’ version of the quantum Zeno effect6, we show how to boost the counterfactual inference probability to unity, thereby beating the random guessing limit. Our methods are general and apply to any physical system, as illustrated by a discussion of trapped-ion systems. Finally, we briefly show that, in certain circumstances, counterfactual computation can eliminate errors induced by decoherence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: An optical realization of counterfactual computation.
Figure 2: Experimentally determined probabilities for the output state of 670-nm single photons conditionally prepared through downconversion17.
Figure 3: Proposed set-up for the ‘chained Zeno effect’.

References

  1. Jozsa, R. in Lecture Notes in Computer Science (ed. Williams, C. P.) Vol. 1509, 103–112 (Springer, London, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elitzur, A. C. & Vaidman, L. Quantum-mechanical interaction-free measurements. Found. Phys. 23, 987–997 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwiat, P. G. et al. High-efficiency quantum interrogation measurements via the quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4725–4728 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Grover, L. K. Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325–328 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchison, G. & Jozsa, R. Counterfactual computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 1175–1193 (2001)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Misra, B. & Sudarshan, E. C. G. The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 18, 756–763 (1977)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, M. A. & Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 248–276 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwiat, P. G., Mitchell, J. R., Schwindt, P. D. D. & White, A. G. Grover's search algorithm: an optical approach. J. Mod. Opt. 47, 257–266 (2000)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwiat, P. G. et al. Interaction-free measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4763–4766 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Franson, J. D., Jacobs, B. C. & Pittman, T. B. Quantum computing using single photons and the Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 70, 062302 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rudolph, T. & Grover, L. Quantum searching a classical database (or how we learned to stop worrying and love the bomb). Preprint at http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0206066 (2002).

  12. Dhar, D., Grover, L. K. & Roy, S. M. Preserving quantum states: A Super-Zeno effect. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/quant-ph/0504070 (2005).

  13. Viola, L. & Lloyd, S. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733–2744 (1998)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Monroe, C., Meekhof, D. M., King, B. E. & Wineland, D. J. A “Schrodinger Cat” superposition state of an atom. Science 272, 1131–1136 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brickman, K. A. et al. Implementation of Grover's quantum search algorithm in a scalable system. Phys. Rev. A 72, 050306 (R) (2005).

  16. Rowe, M. A. et al. Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection. Nature 409, 791–794 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hong, C. K. & Mandel, L. Experimental realization of a localized one-photon state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 58–60 (1986)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge discussions with B. DeMarco, and partial support from the National Science Foundation, Disruptive Technologies Office, and the US Army Research Office.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Matthew T. Rakher

    Present address: Department of Physics, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, 93106, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, 61801, Urbana, USA

    Onur Hosten, Matthew T. Rakher, Julio T. Barreiro, Nicholas A. Peters & Paul G. Kwiat

Authors
  1. Onur Hosten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew T. Rakher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julio T. Barreiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicholas A. Peters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul G. Kwiat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onur Hosten.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods

This file contains details on the algorithm and the experimental encoding; the experiment; clarifications; and the high-efficiency qubit-by-qubit-interrogation technique. This file also presents a method to interrogate all database elements simultaneously.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hosten, O., Rakher, M., Barreiro, J. et al. Counterfactual quantum computation through quantum interrogation. Nature 439, 949–952 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04523

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing