Letter | Published:

An acidic protein aligns magnetosomes along a filamentous structure in magnetotactic bacteria

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 11 May 2006

Abstract

Magnetotactic bacteria are widespread aquatic microorganisms that use unique intracellular organelles to navigate along the Earth's magnetic field. These organelles, called magnetosomes, consist of membrane-enclosed magnetite crystals that are thought to help to direct bacterial swimming towards growth-favouring microoxic zones at the bottom of natural waters1. Questions in the study of magnetosome formation include understanding the factors governing the size and redox-controlled synthesis of the nano-sized magnetosomes and their assembly into a regular chain in order to achieve the maximum possible magnetic moment, against the physical tendency of magnetosome agglomeration. A deeper understanding of these mechanisms is expected from studying the genes present in the identified chromosomal ‘magnetosome island’, for which the connection with magnetosome synthesis has become evident2. Here we use gene deletion in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense to show that magnetosome alignment is coupled to the presence of the mamJ gene product. MamJ is an acidic protein associated with a novel filamentous structure, as revealed by fluorescence microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. We suggest a mechanism in which MamJ interacts with the magnetosome surface as well as with a cytoskeleton-like structure. According to our hypothesis, magnetosome architecture represents one of the highest structural levels achieved in prokaryotic cells.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Bazylinski, D. A. & Frankel, R. B. Magnetosome formation in prokaryotes. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 2, 217–230 (2004)

  2. 2

    Ullrich, S., Kube, M., Schübbe, S., Reinhardt, R. & Schüler, D. A hypervariable 130 kb genomic region of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense comprises a magnetosome island, which undergoes frequent rearrangements during stationary growth. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7176–7184 (2005)

  3. 3

    Bazylinski, D. Structure and function of the bacterial magnetosome. ASM News 61, 337–343 (1995)

  4. 4

    Bazylinski, D. A., Garratt-Reed, A. J. & Frankel, R. B. Electron-microscopic studies of magnetosomes in magnetotactic bacteria. Microsc. Res. Tech. 27, 389–401 (1994)

  5. 5

    Dunin-Borkowski, R. E. et al. Magnetic microstructure of magnetotactic bacteria by electron holography. Science 282, 1868–1870 (1998)

  6. 6

    Kirschvink, J. L. Paleomagnetic evidence for fossil biogenic magnetite in western Crete. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 59, 388–392 (1982)

  7. 7

    Vali, H. & Kirschvink, J. L. in Iron Biominerals (eds Frankel, R. B. & Blakemore, R. P.) 97–116 (Plenum Press, New York and London, 1991)

  8. 8

    Grünberg, K. et al. Biochemical and proteomic analysis of the magnetosome membrane in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1040–1050 (2004)

  9. 9

    Evans, J. S. ‘Apples’ and ‘oranges’: comparing the structural aspects of biomineral- and ice-interaction proteins. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interf. Sci. 8, 48–54 (2003)

  10. 10

    Schüler, D., Uhl, R. & Baeuerlein, E. A simple light-scattering method to assay magnetism in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 132, 139–145 (1995)

  11. 11

    Philipse, A. P. & Maas, D. Magnetic colloids from magnetotactic bacteria: Chain formation and colloidal stability. Langmuir 18, 9977–9984 (2002)

  12. 12

    Komeili, A., Vali, H., Beveridge, T. J. & Newman, D. K. Magnetosome vesicles are present before magnetite formation, and MamA is required for their activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3839–3844 (2004)

  13. 13

    Schübbe, S. et al. Characterization of a spontaneous nonmagnetic mutant of Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense reveals a large deletion comprising a putative magnetosome island. J. Bacteriol. 185, 5779–5790 (2003)

  14. 14

    Kürner, J., Frangakis, A. S. & Baumeister, W. Cryo-electron tomography reveals the cytoskeletal structure of Spiroplasma melliferum. Science 307, 436–438 (2005)

  15. 15

    Errington, J. Dynamic proteins and a cytoskeleton in bacteria. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 175–178 (2003)

  16. 16

    Schüler, D. Molecular analysis of a subcellular compartment: the magnetosome membrane in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Arch. Microbiol. 181, 1–7 (2004)

  17. 17

    Diebel, C. E., Proksch, R., Green, C. R., Nellson, P. & Walker, M. M. Magnetite defines a vertebrate magnetreceptor. Nature 406, 299–302 (2000)

  18. 18

    Mora, C. V., Davidson, M., Wild, J. M. & Walker, M. M. Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature 432, 508–511 (2004)

  19. 19

    Sambrook, J. & Russel, D. W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 3rd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 2001)

  20. 20

    Heyen, U. & Schüler, D. Growth and magnetosome formation by microaerophilic Magnetospirillum strains in an oxygen-controlled fermentor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61, 536–544 (2003)

  21. 21

    Schultheiss, D. & Schüler, D. Development of a genetic system for Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense. Arch. Microbiol. 179, 89–94 (2003)

  22. 22

    Schultheiss, D., Kube, M. & Schüler, D. Inactivation of the flagellin gene flaA in Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense results in non-magnetotactic mutants lacking flagellar filaments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 3624–3631 (2004)

  23. 23

    Grimm, R., Typke, D., Barmann, M. & Baumeister, W. Determination of the inelastic mean free path in ice by examination of tilted vesicles and automated most probable loss imaging. Ultramicroscopy 63, 169–179 (1996)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Graumann for advice on fluorescence microscopy and F. Widdel for helpful comments. This research was supported by the Max Planck Society and the Biofuture program of the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Author Contributions A.S. carried out all genetic and growth experiments and performed fluorescence and TEM microscopy. M.G. carried out cryo-electron tomography and analysis of tomograms. D.F. participated in induction experiments. A.L. participated in three-dimensional visualization. J.M.P. directed cryo-electron tomography, EFTEM experiments and data analysis. D.S. coordinated the study and with A.S. finalized the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Dirk Schüler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure Legends

Text to accompany the below Supplementary Figures. (DOC 26 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

Domain structure of the MamJ protein (PDF 224 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

Molecular organization of the mamAB cluster in the wild type and δmamJ (PDF 13 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

Cryo-ET of a wild type cell showing a chain of mature magnetosome crystals located adjacent to the cytoplasmic membrane (PDF 1853 kb)

Supplementary Video 1

Three-dimensional reconstruction of magnetosome organization along a cytoskeleton-like structure in a wild-type M. gryphiswaldense cell obtained by Cryo-ET. (MOV 9703 kb)

Supplementary Video Legend

Text to accompany the above Supplementary Video. (DOC 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: Δ mamJ mutant phenotype and intracellular localization of MamJ.
Figure 2: Cryo-electron tomography of wild-type and Δ mamJ cells.
Figure 3: Time course of magnetite formation in wild-type and Δ mamJ cells after induction.
Figure 4: Model for magnetosome chain assembly.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.