Letter | Published:

Strong quantum-confined Stark effect in germanium quantum-well structures on silicon

Abstract

Silicon is the dominant semiconductor for electronics, but there is now a growing need to integrate such components with optoelectronics for telecommunications and computer interconnections1. Silicon-based optical modulators have recently been successfully demonstrated2,3; but because the light modulation mechanisms in silicon4 are relatively weak, long (for example, several millimetres) devices2 or sophisticated high-quality-factor resonators3 have been necessary. Thin quantum-well structures made from III-V semiconductors such as GaAs, InP and their alloys exhibit the much stronger quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE) mechanism5, which allows modulator structures with only micrometres of optical path length6,7. Such III-V materials are unfortunately difficult to integrate with silicon electronic devices. Germanium is routinely integrated with silicon in electronics8, but previous silicon–germanium structures have also not shown strong modulation effects9,10,11,12,13. Here we report the discovery of the QCSE, at room temperature, in thin germanium quantum-well structures grown on silicon. The QCSE here has strengths comparable to that in III-V materials. Its clarity and strength are particularly surprising because germanium is an indirect gap semiconductor; such semiconductors often display much weaker optical effects than direct gap materials (such as the III-V materials typically used for optoelectronics). This discovery is very promising for small, high-speed14, low-power15,16,17 optical output devices fully compatible with silicon electronics manufacture.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Miller, D. A. B. Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic chips. Proc. IEEE 88, 728–749 (2000)

  2. 2

    Liu, A. et al. A high-speed silicon optical modulator based on a metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor. Nature 427, 615–618 (2004)

  3. 3

    Xu, Q., Schmidt, B., Pradhan, S. & Lipson, M. Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator. Nature 435, 325–327 (2005)

  4. 4

    Soref, R. A. & Bennett, B. R. Electrooptical effects in silicon. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 23, 123–129 (1987)

  5. 5

    Miller, D. A. B. et al. Band-edge electroabsorption in quantum well structures: the quantum-confined Stark effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2173–2176 (1984)

  6. 6

    Arad, U. et al. Development of a large high-performance 2-D array of GaAs-AlGaAs multiple quantum-well modulators. IEEE Photon. Tech. Lett. 15, 1531–1533 (2003)

  7. 7

    Liu, C. P. et al. Design, fabrication and characterisation of normal-incidence 1.56-µm multiple-quantum-well asymmetric Fabry-Perot modulators for passive picocells. IEICE Trans. Electron. E 86C, 1281–1289 (2003)

  8. 8

    Cressler, J. D. SiGe HBT technology: a new contender for Si-Based RF and microwave circuit applications. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 46, 572–589 (1998)

  9. 9

    Qasaimeh, O., Bhattacharya, P. & Croke, E. T. SiGe–Si quantum-well electroabsorption modulators. IEEE Photon. Tech. Lett. 10, 807–809 (1998)

  10. 10

    Miyake, Y., Kim, J. Y., Shiraki, Y. & Fukatsu, S. Absence of Stark shift in strained Si1–xGex/Si type-I quantum wells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 2097–2099 (1996)

  11. 11

    Li, C. et al. Observation of quantum-confined Stark shifts in SiGe/Si type-I multiple quantum wells. J. Appl. Phys. 87, 8195–8197 (2000)

  12. 12

    Park, J. S., Karunasiri, R. P. G. & Wang, K. L. Observation of large Stark shift in GexSi1–x/Si multiple quantum wells. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8, 217–220 (1990)

  13. 13

    Yakimov, A. I. et al. Stark effect in type-II Ge/Si quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 67, 125318 (2003)

  14. 14

    Lewen, R., Irmscher, S., Westergren, U., Thylen, L. & Eriksson, U. Segmented transmission-line electroabsorption modulators. J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 172–179 (2004)

  15. 15

    Krishnamoorthy, A. V. & Miller, D. A. B. Scaling optoelectronic-VLSI circuits into the 21st century: a technology roadmap. IEEE J. Select. Top. Quant. Electron. 2, 55–76 (1996)

  16. 16

    Kibar, O., Van Blerkom, D. A., Fan, C. & Esener, S. C. Power minimization and technology comparisons for digital free-space optoelectronic interconnections. J. Lightwave Technol. 17, 546–555 (1999)

  17. 17

    Cho, H., Kapur, P. & Saraswat, K. C. Power comparison between high-speed electrical and optical interconnects for interchip communication. J. Lightwave Technol. 22, 2021–2033 (2004)

  18. 18

    Miller, D. A. B. et al. Electric field dependence of optical absorption near the bandgap of quantum well structures. Phys. Rev. B 32, 1043–1060 (1985)

  19. 19

    Helman, N. C., Roth, J. E., Bour, D. P., Altug, H. & Miller, D. A. B. Misalignment-tolerant surface-normal low-voltage modulator for optical interconnects. IEEE J. Select. Top. Quant. Electron. 11, 338–342 (2005)

  20. 20

    Schmitt-Rink, S., Chemla, D. S., Knox, W. H. & Miller, D. A. B. How fast is excitonic electroabsorption? Opt. Lett. 15, 60–62 (1990)

  21. 21

    Maslov, A. V. & Citrin, D. S. Quantum-well optical modulator at terahertz frequencies. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 10131–10133 (2003)

  22. 22

    Galdin, S., Dollfus, P., Aubry-Fortuna, V., Hesto, P. & Osten, H. J. Band offset predictions for strained group IV alloys: Si1-x-yGexCy on Si(001) and Si1-xGex on Si1-zGez(001). Semicond. Sci. Technol. 15, 565–572 (2000)

  23. 23

    Rieger, M. M. & Vogl, P. Electronic-band parameters in strained Si1-xGex alloys on Si1-yGey substrates. Phys. Rev. B 48, 14276–14287 (1993)

  24. 24

    Schaffler, F. High-mobility Si and Ge structures. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12, 1515–1549 (1997)

  25. 25

    Goossen, K. W., Yan, R. H., Cunningham, J. E. & Jan, W. Y. AlxGa1-xAs-AlAs quantum well surface-normal electroabsorption modulators operating at visible wavelengths. Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 1829–1831 (1991)

  26. 26

    Crow, G. C. & Abram, R. A. Monte Carlo simulations of hole transport in SiGe and Ge quantum wells. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 15, 7–14 (2000)

  27. 27

    Dresselhaus, G., Kip, A. F. & Kittel, C. Cyclotron resonance of electrons and holes in silicon and germanium crystals. Phys. Rev. 98, 368–384 (1955)

  28. 28

    Lawaetz, P. Valence-band parameters in cubic semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 4, 3460–3467 (1971)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank V. Lordi for help with photocurrent setup. We also thank J. Fu, T. Krishnamohan and X. Yu for help with device fabrication and material characterization. Finally, we thank G. S. Solomon and D. S. Gardner for discussions. This work was supported by Intel Corporation and the DARPA/ARO EPIC programme.

Author information

Correspondence to Yu-Hsuan Kuo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: The bandgap structure of a Ge/SiGe quantum well (not to scale).
Figure 2: Schematic diagram of a p-i-n diode.
Figure 3: Effective absorption coefficient spectra.
Figure 4: Shifts of exciton peaks.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.