Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running

Nature volume 439, pages 72–75 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Although people's legs are capable of a broad range of muscle-use and gait patterns, they generally prefer just two. They walk, swinging their body over a relatively straight leg with each step, or run, bouncing up off a bent leg between aerial phases. Walking feels easiest when going slowly, and running feels easiest when going faster. More unusual gaits seem more tiring. Perhaps this is because walking and running use the least energy1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Addressing this classic1 conjecture with experiments2,3 requires comparing walking and running with many other strange and unpractised gaits. As an alternative, a basic understanding of gait choice might be obtained by calculating energy cost by using mechanics-based models. Here we use a minimal model that can describe walking and running as well as an infinite variety of other gaits. We use computer optimization to find which gaits are indeed energetically optimal for this model. At low speeds the optimization discovers the classic inverted-pendulum walk8,9,10,11,12,13, at high speeds it discovers a bouncing run12,13, even without springs, and at intermediate speeds it finds a new pendular-running gait that includes walking and running as extreme cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Body motion in human gaits.
Figure 2: Point-mass biped model and its optimal solutions.
Figure 3: The regions in which each of the three collisional gaits are optimal.
Figure 4: Cost of transport versus speed.

References

  1. Borelli, G. A. De Motu Animalium, Pars Prima (On the Movement of Animals) (Angeli Bernabo, Rome, 1680)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Margaria, R. Biomechanics and Energetics of Muscular Exercise (Clarendon, Oxford, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyt, D. F. & Taylor, C. R. Gait and the energetics of locomotion in horses. Nature 292, 239–240 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander, R. McN. Optimum walking techniques for quadrupeds and bipeds. J. Zool. Lond. 192, 97–117 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, R. McN. Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. Physiol. Rev. 69, 1199–1227 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alexander, R. McN. A model of bipedal locomotion on compliant legs. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 338, 189–198 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Minetti, A. E. & Alexander, R. McN. A theory of metabolic costs for bipedal gaits. J. Theor. Biol. 186, 467–476 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander, R. McN. in Perspectives in Experimental Biology Vol. 1 (ed. Davies, P. S.) 493–504 (Pergamon, New York, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cavagna, G. A., Heglund, N. C. & Taylor, C. R. Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. Am. J. Physiol. 233, R243–R261 (1977)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexander, R. McN. Simple models of human motion. Appl. Mech. Rev. 48, 461–469 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuo, A. D. Energetics of actively powered locomotion using the simplest walking model. J. Biomech. Eng. 124, 113–120 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruina, A., Bertram, J. E. A. & Srinivasan, M. A collisional model of the energetic cost of support work qualitatively explains leg sequencing in walking and galloping, pseudo-elastic leg behavior in running and the walk-to-run transition. J. Theor. Biol. [online], 14 June 2005 (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.04.004)

  13. Kuo, D. A., Donelan, J. M. & Ruina, A. Energetic consequences of walking like an inverted pendulum: step-to-step transitions. Exercise Sport Sci. Rev. 3, 88–97 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rashevsky, N. Studies in the physico-mathematical theory of organic form. Bull. Math. Biophys. 6, 1–59 (1944)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander, R. McN. Elastic Mechanisms in Animal Movement (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McMahon, T. A. & Cheng, G. C. The mechanics of running: how does stiffness couple with speed? J. Biomech. 23 (Suppl. 1), 65–78 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Blickhan, R. & Full, R. J. Similarity in multilegged locomotion: bouncing like a monopode. J. Comp. Physiol. A 173, 509–517 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo, A. D. A simple model predicts the step length-speed relationship in human walking. J. Biomech. Eng. 123, 264–269 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thorstensson, A. & Robertson, H. Adaptations to changing speed in human locomotion: speed of transition between walking and running. Acta Physiol. Scand. 131, 211–214 (1987)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Minetti, A. E., Ardigo, L. P. & Saibene, F. The transition between walking and running in humans: metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. Acta Physiol. Scand. 150, 315–323 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Farley, C. T. & Ortega, J. D. Minimizing center of mass vertical movement increases metabolic cost in walking. J. Appl. Physiol. [online], 28 July 2005 (doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00103.2005)

  22. Gordon, K., Ferris, D. & Kuo, A. Proc. 27th Annual Meeting, American Society of Biomechanics Abstr. 113 (American Society of Biomechanics, Toledo, Ohio, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bramble, D. M. & Lieberman, D. E. Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature 432, 345–352 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marsh, R. L. et al. Partitioning the energetics of walking and running: swinging the legs is expensive. Science 303, 80–83 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kram, R. & Taylor, C. R. Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 346, 265–267 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Minetti, A. E. The biomechanics of skipping gaits: a third locomotor paradigm? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1227–1235 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson, F. C. & Pandy, M. G. Dynamic optimization of human walking. J. Biomech. Engng 123, 381–390 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Gill, P. E., Murray, W. & Saunders, M. A. SNOPT: An SQP algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 12, 979–1006 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Bryson, A. E. & Ho, Y. C. Applied Optimal Control (John Wiley, New York, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bertram, J. E. A., D'Antonio, P., Pardo, J. & Lee, D. V. Pace-length effects in human walking: ‘Groucho gaits’ revisited. J. Mot. Behav. 34, 309–318 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Bertram for extensive discussions on related topics; J. Burns, A. Chatterjee, P. Holmes, A. Schwab, S. Strogatz, S. van Nouhuys and S. Walcott for editorial and technical comments. Author Contributions M.S. formulated the mechanical model and performed the numerical optimizations. This was partly informed by extensive discussions with A.R. during the writing of ref. 12, and from a course taught by A.R. The authors contributed equally to the analytic calculations, the interpretation of the results and to the writing of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bio-robotics and Locomotion Laboratory, Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, 306 Kimball Hall, New York, 14853, Ithaca, USA

    Manoj Srinivasan & Andy Ruina

Authors
  1. Manoj Srinivasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andy Ruina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Srinivasan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Srinivasan, M., Ruina, A. Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running. Nature 439, 72–75 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04113

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing