Trophic cascades across ecosystems

Abstract

Predation can be intense, creating strong direct and indirect effects throughout food webs1,2,3,4. In addition, ecologists increasingly recognize that fluxes of organisms across ecosystem boundaries can have major consequences for community dynamics5,6. Species with complex life histories often shift habitats during their life cycles7 and provide potent conduits coupling ecosystems5,6. Thus, local interactions that affect predator abundance in one ecosystem (for example a larval habitat) may have reverberating effects in another (for example an adult habitat). Here we show that fish indirectly facilitate terrestrial plant reproduction through cascading trophic interactions across ecosystem boundaries. Fish reduce larval dragonfly abundances in ponds, leading to fewer adult dragonflies nearby. Adult dragonflies consume insect pollinators and alter their foraging behaviour. As a result, plants near ponds with fish receive more pollinator visits and are less pollen limited than plants near fish-free ponds. Our results confirm that strong species interactions can reverberate across ecosystems, and emphasize the importance of landscape-level processes in driving local species interactions.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Interaction web showing the pathway by which fish facilitate plant reproduction.
Figure 2: Surveyed dragonfly abundances in and near fish-containing and fish-free ponds.
Figure 3: Pollinator visitation rates to Hypericum fasciculatum.
Figure 4: Results from pollen supplementation experiments.
Figure 5: Effects of dragonflies on pollinators.

References

  1. 1

    Terborgh, J. L. et al. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294, 1923–1926 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., Hillebrand, H. & Sommer, U. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417, 848–851 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sinclair, A. R. E., Mduma, S. & Brashares, J. S. Patterns of predation in a diverse predator-prey system. Nature 425, 288–290 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Finke, D. L. & Denno, R. F. Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature 429, 407–410 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Polis, G. A., Anderson, W. B. & Holt, R. D. Towards an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 289–316 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Polis, G. A., Power, M. E. & Huxel, G. R. Food Webs at the Landscape Level (Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Werner, E. E. & Gilliam, J. F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 393–425 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Pace, M. L., Cole, J. J., Carpenter, S. R. & Kitchell, J. F. Trophic cascades revealed in diverse ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 483–488 (1999)

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Knight, T. M. et al. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36, 467–497 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kremen, C. & Ricketts, T. H. Global perspectives on pollination disruptions. Conserv. Biol. 14, 1226–1228 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Dukas, R. & Morse, D. H. Crab spiders affect flower visitation by bees. Oikos 101, 157–163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Suttle, K. B. Pollinators as mediators of top-down effects on plants. Ecol. Lett. 6, 688–694 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Muñoz, A. A. & Arroyo, M. T. K. Negative impacts of a vertebrate predator on insect pollinator visitation and seed output in Chuquiraga oppositifolia, a high Andean shrub. Oecologia 138, 66–73 (2004)

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Shurin, J. B. et al. A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol. Lett. 5, 785–791 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Nakano, S. & Murakami, M. Reciprocal subsidies: Dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 166–170 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Murakami, M. & Nakano, S. Indirect effect of aquatic insect emergence on a terrestrial insect population through predation by birds. Ecol. Lett. 5, 333–337 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Sabo, J. L. & Power, M. E. River-watershed exchange: Effects of riverine subsidies on riparian lizards and their terrestrial prey. Ecology 83, 1860–1869 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Morin, P. J. The impact of fish exclusion on the abundance and species composition of larval odonates: results of short-term experiments in a North Carolina farm pond. Ecology 65, 53–60 (1984)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Johansson, F. & Brodin, T. Effects of fish predators and abiotic factors on dragonfly community structure. J. Freshwat. Ecol. 18, 415–423 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Byers, C. F. A Contribution to the Knowledge of Florida Odonata (Univ. of Florida Press, Gainesville, Florida, 1930)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wright, M. Some random observations on dragonfly habits with notes on their predaceousness on bees. J. Tennessee Acad. Sci. 19, 295–301 (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Needham, J. G. Notes on some dragonflies of southwest peninsular Florida. Bull. Brooklyn. Entomol. Soc. 40, 104–110 (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Takhtajan, A. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Corbet, P. S. Dragonflies: Behavior and Ecology of Odonata (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Leibold, M. A. et al. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology. Ecol. Lett. 7, 601–613 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Knapp, R. A., Matthews, K. R. & Sarnelle, O. Resistance and resilience of alpine lake fauna to fish introductions. Ecol. Monogr. 71, 401–421 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Moyle, P. B. in Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii (eds Mooney, H. A. & Drake, J. A.) 27–43 (Springer, New York, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Dunkle, S. W. Dragonflies of the Florida Peninsula, Bermuda, and the Bahamas (Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T.-L. Ashman, M. Barfield, J. Drake, L. Harmon, J. Knouft, J. Steets, J. M. Chase's lab group and the C. W. Osenberg, B. Bolker and C. St Mary lab group for discussion and comments, T. Kim for field assistance, and S. Coates for logistical support. Funding was provided by The University of Florida Foundation and Washington University in St Louis. Additional support to T.M.K. was through a fellowship from the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiffany M. Knight.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods

Details of additional methods used to determine that there were no environmental or structural differences among pond types and a complementary experiment with another plant show similar trans-ecosystem cascades. (DOC 6735 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knight, T., McCoy, M., Chase, J. et al. Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437, 880–883 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03962

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing