Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host–parasite system


Antagonistic coevolution between hosts and parasites in spatially structured populations can result in local adaptation of parasites1,2,3,4,5; that is, the greater infectivity of local parasites than foreign parasites on local hosts1. Such parasite specialization on local hosts has implications for human health and agriculture. By contrast with classic single-species population-genetic models6,7, theory indicates that parasite migration between subpopulations might increase parasite local adaptation, as long as migration does not completely homogenize populations8,9,10,11. To test this hypothesis we developed a system-specific mathematical model and then coevolved replicate populations of the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens and a parasitic bacteriophage with parasite only, with host only or with no migration. Here we show that patterns of local adaptation have considerable temporal and spatial variation and that, in the absence of migration, parasites tend to be locally maladapted. However, in accord with our model, parasite migration results in parasite local adaptation, but host migration alone has no significant effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: The simulated effect of differential migration rates on local adaptation.
Figure 2: The effect of differential migration rates on local adaptation.
Figure 3: Mean local adaptation of parasites.
Figure 4: Mean parasite infectivity.


  1. Kawecki, T. D. & Ebert, D. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1225–1241 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ebert, D. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 265, 1084–1086 (1994)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaltz, O. & Shykoff, J. A. Local-adaptation in host–parasite systems. Heredity 81, 361–370 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson, J. N. The evolution of species interactions. Science 284, 2116–2118 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Thompson, J. N. Specific hypotheses on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Am. Nat. 153, S1–S14 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slatkin, M. Gene flow and the genetic structure of natural populations. Science 236, 787–792 (1987)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lenormand, T. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 183–189 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandon, S., Capowiez, Y., Dubois, Y., Michalakis, Y. & Olivieri, I. Local adaptation and gene for gene coevolution in a metapopulation model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 1003–1009 (1996)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lively, C. M. Migration, virulence and the geographic mosaic of adaptation by parasites. Am. Nat. 153, S34–S47 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandon, S. & Michalakis, Y. Local adaptation, evolutionary potential and host–parasite coevolution: interactions between migration, mutation, population size and generation time. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 451–462 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gandon, S. Local adaptation and the geometry of host–parasite coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 5, 246–256 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Parker, M. A. Local population differentiation for compatability in an annual legume and its host-specific fungal pathogen. Evolution 39, 713–723 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lively, C. M. Adaptation by a parasitic trematode to local populations of its host. Evolution 46, 1663–1671 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lively, C. M. & Dybdahl, M. F. Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypes. Nature 405, 679–681 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCoy, K. D., Boulinier, T., Schjorring, S. & Michalakis, Y. Local adaptation of the ectoparasite Ixodes uriae to its seabird host. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 441–456 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaltz, O., Gandon, S., Michalakis, Y. & Shykoff, J. A. Local maladaptation in the anther-smut fungus Microbortyum violaceum to its host Silene latifolia: Evidence from a cross inoculation experiment. Evolution 53, 395–407 (1999)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mutikainen, P., Salonen, V., Puustinen, S. & Koskela, T. Local adaptation, resistance, and virulence in a hemiparasitic plant–host plant interaction. Evolution 54, 433–440 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oppliger, A., Vernet, R. & Baez, M. Parasite local maladaptation in the Canarian lizard Gallotia galloti (Reptilia: Lacertidae) parasitized by haemogregarian blood parasite. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 951–955 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Buckling, A. & Rainey, P. B. Antagonistic coevolution between a bacterium and a bacteriophage. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 931–936 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Forde, S. E., Thompson, J. N. & Bohannan, B. J. M. Adaptation varies through space and time in a coevolving host–parasitoid interaction. Nature 431, 841–844 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brockhurst, M. A., Morgan, A. D., Rainey, P. B. & Buckling, A. Population mixing accelerates coevolution. Ecol. Lett. 6, 975–979 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. Long term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. 1. Adaptation and divergence during 2000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315–1341 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Agrawal, A. & Lively, C. M. Infection genetics: gene-for-gene versus matching-alleles models and all points in between. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4, 79–90 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Frank, S. A. Statistical properties of polymorphism in host–parasite genetics. Evol. Ecol. 10, 307–317 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morand, S., Manning, S. D. & Woolhouse, M. E. J. Parasite–host coevolution and geographic patterns of parasite infectivity and host susceptibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 119–128 (1996)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Crawley, M. J. GLIM for Ecologists (Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lenski, R. E. Coevolution of bacteria and phage—are there endless cycles of bacterial defenses and phage counterdefenses? J. Theor. Biol. 108, 319–325 (1984)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Miralles, R., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Effect of poulation patchiness and migration rates on the adaptation and divergence of vesicular stomatitis virus quasispecies populations. J. Gen. Virol. 80, 2051–2059 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rainey, P. B. & Bailey, M. J. Physical and genetic map of the Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 chromosome. Mol. Microbiol. 19, 521–533 (1996)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank M. Brockhurst, T. Day, F. Harrison, O. Kaltz, C. Lively and his group, Y. Michalakis, I. Olivieri, L. Lopez Pascua and A. Rivero for comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by the Royal Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew D. Morgan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

The Supplementary Notes contains a discussion of different measures of local adaptation (including Fig. S1) and details of the model formulation and results (including a table and Fig. S2). (DOC 268 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, A., Gandon, S. & Buckling, A. The effect of migration on local adaptation in a coevolving host–parasite system. Nature 437, 253–256 (2005).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing