Biodiversity hotspots have a prominent role in conservation biology1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, but it remains controversial to what extent different types of hotspot are congruent4,10,11,12,13,14. Previous studies were unable to provide a general answer because they used a single biodiversity index, were geographically restricted, compared areas of unequal size or did not quantitatively compare hotspot types1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22. Here we use a new global database on the breeding distribution of all known extant bird species to test for congruence across three types of hotspot. We demonstrate that hotspots of species richness, threat and endemism do not show the same geographical distribution. Only 2.5% of hotspot areas are common to all three aspects of diversity, with over 80% of hotspots being idiosyncratic. More generally, there is a surprisingly low overall congruence of biodiversity indices, with any one index explaining less than 24% of variation in the other indices. These results suggest that, even within a single taxonomic class, different mechanisms are responsible for the origin and maintenance of different aspects of diversity. Consequently, the different types of hotspots also vary greatly in their utility as conservation tools.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Myers, N. Threatened biotas: ‘hotspots’ in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8, 187–208 (1988)
Myers, N. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. Environmentalist 10, 243–256 (1990)
Bibby, C. et al. Putting Biodiversity on the Map: Priority Areas for Global Conservation (ICPB, Cambridge, UK, 1992)
Dobson, A. P., Rodriguez, J. P., Roberts, M. W. & Wilcove, D. S. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–553 (1993)
Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. & Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998)
Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Gil, P. R. & Mittermeier, C. G. Hotspots: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions (Cemex, Conservation International and Agrupación Sierra Madre, Monterrey, Mexico, 1999)
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000)
BirdLife International, Threatened Birds of the World (Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, Barcelona and Cambridge, UK, 2000)
Mittermeier, R. A. et al. Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions (Cemex, Conservation International and Agrupación Sierra Madre, Monterrey, Mexico, 2005)
Prendergast, J. R., Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H., Eversham, B. C. & Gibbons, D. W. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335–337 (1993)
Pressey, R. L., Humphries, C. J., Margules, C. R., Vane-Wright, R. I. & Williams, P. H. Beyond opportunism: key principles for systematic reserve selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8, 124–128 (1993)
Williams, P. et al. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10, 155–174 (1996)
Virolainen, K. M. et al. Hot spots, indicator taxa, complementarity and optimal networks of taiga. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1143–1147 (2000)
Bonn, A., Rodriguez, A. S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Threatened and endemic species: are they good indiators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scale? Ecol. Lett. 5, 733–741 (2002)
Thomas, C. D. & Mallorie, H. C. Rarity, species richness and conservation: butterflies of the Atlas Mountains in Morocco. Biol. Conserv. 33, 95–117 (1985)
Berg, A. & Tjernberg, M. Common and rare Swedish vertebrates — distribution and habitat preferences. Biodivers. Conserv. 5, 101–128 (1996)
Howard, P. C. et al. Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394, 472–475 (1998)
Lawton, J. H. et al. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391, 72–76 (1998)
Lennon, J. J., Koleff, P., Greenwood, J. J. D. & Gaston, K. J. Contribution of rarity and commonness to patterns of species richness. Ecol. Lett. 7, 81–87 (2004)
Jetz, W., Rahbek, C. & Colwell, R. K. The coincidence of rarity and richness and the potential signature of history in centres of endemism. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1180–1191 (2004)
Brooks, T. et al. Toward a blueprint for conservation in Africa. Bioscience 51, 613–624 (2001)
Baillie, J. E. M., Hilton-Taylor, C. & Stuart, S. N. 2004 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species: A Global Species Assessment (IUCN, Glad, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 2004)
Jetz, W. & Rahbek, C. Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 297, 1548–1551 (2002)
Rahbek, C. & Graves, G. R. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4534–4539 (2001)
Gaston, K. J. & Blackburn, T. M. The spatial distribution of threatened species: macro-scales and New World birds. Proc. R Soc. Lond. B 263, 235–240 (1996)
Sibley, C. G. & Monroe, B. L. Distribution and Taxonomy of the Birds of the World (Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, 1990)
Defense Mapping Agency (Mapping Agency, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, 1992).
SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 2001).
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the worlds: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001)
We thank B. Beehler, L. Birch, T. Brooks, B. Coates, J. Cromie, J. Diamond, J. Eckstrom, S. Elsworthy, H. Fry, E. Harvey, A. Headon, P. Higgins, D. McNicol, D. Mehlman, C. Perrins, J. Price, R. Porter, H. Pratt, R. Prys-Jones, N. Redman, C. Robertson, B. Sheldon, I. Sherman, R. Simpson, I. Sinclair, A. Silcocks, M. Strange, M. Unwin, E. Urban, M. Weston, M. Whitby, P. Williams, D. Wynn, B. Young, J. Zook, A. and C. Black. We also thank Academic Press, BirdGuides, BirdLife International, Birds Australia, C. Helm, Conservation International, NatureServe, Oxford Univ. Press, the Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Princeton Univ. Press, the Alexander Library (Oxford), and the Natural History Museum (Tring) for access to data and libraries; and M. Balman, S. Butchart, T. Brooks, M. Cardillo, W. Jetz, A. Phillimore, H. Possingham, A. Purvis and W. Sechrest for comments or help. This work was funded by The Natural Environment Research Council.
Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Orme, C., Davies, R., Burgess, M. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03850
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2022)
Isolation and characterization of wood-decomposing basidiomycetes from the Andean Forest in Boyacá, Colombia
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology (2022)
Folia Geobotanica (2022)
Spatial phylogenetic patterns and conservation of threatened woody species in a transition zone of southwest China
Biodiversity and Conservation (2022)
Biodiversity and Conservation (2022)