Letter | Published:

Observation of nuclear fusion driven by a pyroelectric crystal

Nature volume 434, pages 11151117 (28 April 2005) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

While progress in fusion research continues with magnetic1 and inertial2 confinement, alternative approaches—such as Coulomb explosions of deuterium clusters3 and ultrafast laser–plasma interactions4—also provide insight into basic processes and technological applications. However, attempts to produce fusion in a room temperature solid-state setting, including ‘cold’ fusion5 and ‘bubble’ fusion6, have met with deep scepticism7. Here we report that gently heating a pyroelectric crystal in a deuterated atmosphere can generate fusion under desktop conditions. The electrostatic field of the crystal is used to generate and accelerate a deuteron beam (> 100 keV and >4 nA), which, upon striking a deuterated target, produces a neutron flux over 400 times the background level. The presence of neutrons from the reaction D + D → 3He (820 keV) + n (2.45 MeV) within the target is confirmed by pulse shape analysis and proton recoil spectroscopy. As further evidence for this fusion reaction, we use a novel time-of-flight technique to demonstrate the delayed coincidence between the outgoing α-particle and the neutron. Although the reported fusion is not useful in the power-producing sense, we anticipate that the system will find application as a simple palm-sized neutron generator.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Review of the ITER project. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 14, 1369–1375 (2004)

  2. 2.

    , & The National Ignition Facility: enabling fusion ignition for the 21st century. Nucl. Fusion 44, S228–S238 (2004)

  3. 3.

    et al. Nuclear fusion from explosions of femtosecond laser-heated deuterium clusters. Nature 398, 489–492 (1999)

  4. 4.

    et al. Neutron production by 200 mJ ultrashort laser pulses. Phys. Rev. E 58, 1165–1168 (1998)

  5. 5.

    Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion (Random House, New York, 1993)

  6. 6.

    et al. Evidence for nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitations. Science 295, 1868–1873 (2002)

  7. 7.

    & Questions regarding nuclear emissions in cavitation experiments. Science 297, 1603 (2002)

  8. 8.

    Dielectric, thermal, and pyroelectric properties of ferroelectric LiTaO3 . Phys. Rev. 172, 564–571 (1968)

  9. 9.

    , & Thermally stimulated field emission from pyroelectric LiNbO3 . Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 17–19 (1974)

  10. 10.

    Electron emission from ferroelectrics—a review. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 340, 80–89 (1994)

  11. 11.

    , , , & Observation of multiple nearly monoenergetic electron production by heated pyroelectric crystals in ambient gas. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 1158–1159 (2001)

  12. 12.

    , , & Electron emission from ferroelectrics. J. Appl. Phys. 88, 6109–6161 (2000)

  13. 13.

    The stopping of energetic ions in solids. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 168, 17–24 (1980)

  14. 14.

    & Improved formulas for fusion cross-sections and thermal reactivities. Nucl. Fusion 32, 611–631 (1992)

  15. 15.

    Can inertial electrostatic confinement work beyond the ion-ion collisional time scale? Phys. Plasmas 2, 3804–3819 (1995)

  16. 16.

    Farnsworth, P. T. Electric discharge device for producing interactions between nuclei. US Patent No. 3258402 (1966).

  17. 17.

    Farnsworth, P. T. Method and apparatus for producing nuclear-fusion reactions. US Patent No. 3386883 (1968).

  18. 18.

    Inertial-electrostatic confinement of ionized fusion gases. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 4522–4534 (1967)

  19. 19.

    Micropropulsion for small spacecraft: a new challenge for field effect electric propulsion and microstructured liquid metal ion sources. Surf. Interface Anal. 36, 380–386 (2004)

  20. 20.

    et al. GEANT4 — a simulation toolkit. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 506, 250–303 (2003)

  21. 21.

    et al. Calibration of an organic scintillator for neutron spectrometry. Nucl. Instrum. Methods 65, 8–25 (1968)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The neutron detector was built with funds from DARPA. Funding for various stages of this project was provided by the NSF, ONR and DARPA. We thank W. Wright and K. O'Doherty for demonstrations of electron and ion emission from pyroelectrics, respectively; H. Lockart for machine workshop expertise; K. O'Doherty for evaporating the 50-nm film onto the plastic scintillator; R. Cousins for recommending the use of liquid scintillator for detection and pulse-shape identification of neutrons, and for overseeing the design and construction of a prototype detector using waveform digitization; and T. Venhaus, W. Harbin and J. Hoffer of LANL (ESA-TSE group) for supplying the deuterated target. S. P. thanks A. Erbil for bringing the phenomenon of ferroelectric emission to his attention, along with ref. 10.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Physics Department,

    • B. Naranjo
    •  & S. Putterman
  2. Chemistry Department,

    • J.K. Gimzewski
  3. CNSI, University of California Los Angeles, California 90095, USA

    • J.K. Gimzewski
    •  & S. Putterman

Authors

  1. Search for B. Naranjo in:

  2. Search for J.K. Gimzewski in:

  3. Search for S. Putterman in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Naranjo.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Methods

    Neutron detection methods including energy scale calibration, pulse shape discrimination, and Monte Carlo efficiency calculation.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Video S1

    This movie is a real-time presentation of the crystal fusion raw data shown in Figure 2 including raw PMT traces of valid neutron hits.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Video S2

    This movie shows the phosphor screen image (25.4 mm diameter) of an ion beam produced upon heating a pyroelectric crystal. Deuterium gas pressure was set to 0.2 Pa. The phosphor intensity, as measured by a CCD camera, is proportional to beam current density. In the central frame, the phosphor intensity is displayed topographically.

Image files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figure S1

    This figure shows the phosphor screen image (25.4 mm diameter) of an ion beam produced upon heating a pyroelectric crystal. The four frames were taken from Supplementary Movie 2. They were separately normalized and gamma corrected to enhance detail. Note the copper mesh's shadow and the FIM image of the tungsten tip.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03575

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.