Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Recruitment of Drosophila Polycomb group proteins to chromatin by DSP1

Abstract

Polycomb and trithorax group (PcG and trxG) proteins maintain silent and active transcriptional states, respectively, throughout development1. In Drosophila, PcG and trxG proteins associate with DNA regions named Polycomb and trithorax response elements (PRE and TRE), but the mechanisms of recruitment are unknown. We previously characterized a minimal element from the regulatory region of the Abdominal-B gene, termed Ab-Fab. Ab-Fab contains a PRE and a TRE and is able to maintain repressed or active chromatin states during development2. Here we show that the Dorsal switch protein 1 (DSP1), a Drosophila HMGB2 homologue, binds to a sequence present within Ab-Fab and in other characterized PREs. Addition of this motif to an artificial sequence containing Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor consensus sites is sufficient for PcG protein recruitment in vivo. Mutations that abolish DSP1 binding to Ab-Fab and to a PRE from the engrailed locus lead to loss of PcG protein binding, loss of silencing, and switching of these PREs into constitutive TREs. The binding of DSP1 to PREs is therefore important for the recruitment of PcG proteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The G(A) motif contributes to the recruitment of PcG proteins.
Figure 2: The G(A) motif is required for PcG-mediated silencing and for PH recruitment in natural PREs.
Figure 3: Binding of DSP1 in the Fab-7 region.
Figure 4: DSP1 participates in PcG-mediated repression.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Francis, N. J. & Kingston, R. E. Mechanisms of transcriptional memory. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 409–421 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Déjardin, J. & Cavalli, G. Chromatin inheritance upon Zeste-mediated Brahma recruitment at a minimal cellular memory module. EMBO J. 23, 857–868 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fauvarque, M.-O. & Dura, J.-M. polyhomeotic regulatory sequences induce develpomental regulator-dependent variegation and targeted P-element insertions in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 7, 1508–1520 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kassis, J. A. Unusual properties of regulatory DNA from the Drosophila engrailed gene: three ‘pairing-sensitive’ sites within a 1.6-kb region. Genetics 136, 1025–1038 (1994)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, C. S., Rastelli, L. & Pirrotta, V. A Polycomb response element in the Ubx gene that determines an epigenetically inherited state of repression. EMBO J. 13, 2553–2564 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zink, D. & Paro, R. Drosophila Polycomb-group regulated chromatin inhibits the accessibility of a trans-activator to its target DNA. EMBO J. 14, 5660–5671 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hagstrom, K., Muller, M. & Schedl, P. A Polycomb and GAGA dependent silencer adjoins the Fab-7 boundary in the Drosophila bithorax complex. Genetics 146, 1365–1380 (1997)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shimell, M. J., Peterson, A. J., Burr, J., Simon, J. A. & O'Connor, M. B. Functional analysis of repressor binding sites in the iab-2 regulatory region of the abdominal-A homeotic gene. Dev. Biol. 218, 38–52 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mishra, R. K. et al. The iab-7 polycomb response element maps to a nucleosome-free region of chromatin and requires both GAGA and Pleiohomeotic for silencing activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1311–1318 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kassis, J. A. Pairing-sensitive silencing, polycomb group response elements, and transposon homing in Drosophila. Adv. Genet. 46, 421–438 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, L. et al. Hierarchical recruitment of polycomb group silencing complexes. Mol. Cell 14, 637–646 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ringrose, L., Rehmsmeier, M., Dura, J. M. & Paro, R. Genome wide prediction of Polycomb/Trithorax response elements in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Cell 5, 759–771 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritsch, C., Brown, J. L., Kassis, J. A. & Muller, J. The DNA-binding polycomb group protein pleiohomeotic mediates silencing of a Drosophila homeotic gene. Development 126, 3905–3913 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Busturia, A. et al. The MCP silencer of the Drosophila Abd-B gene requires both Pleiohomeotic and GAGA factor for the maintenance of repression. Development 128, 2163–2173 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Americo, J. et al. A complex array of DNA-binding proteins required for pairing-sensitive silencing by a Polycomb group response element from the Drosophila engrailed gene. Genetics 160, 1561–1571 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown, J. L., Mucci, D., Whiteley, M., Dirksen, M.-L. & Kassis, J. A. The Drosophila Polycomb group gene pleiohomehotic encodes a DNA binding protein with homology to the transcription factor YY1. Mol. Cell 1, 1057–1064 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brown, J. L., Fritsch, C., Mueller, J. & Kassis, J. A. The Drosophila pho-like gene encodes a YY1-related DNA binding protein that is redundant with pleiohomeotic in homeotic gene silencing. Development 130, 285–294 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Duncan, I. W. Transvection effects in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36, 521–556 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehming, N. et al. An HMG-like protein that can switch a transcriptional activator to a repressor. Nature 371, 175–179 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Brickman, J. M., Adam, M. & Ptashne, M. Interactions between an HMG-1 protein and members of the Rel family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 10679–10683 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Decoville, M., Giacomello, E., Leng, M. & Locker, D. DSP1, an HMG-like protein, is involved in the regulation of homeotic genes. Genetics 157, 237–244 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas, J. O. HMG1 and 2: architectural DNA-binding proteins. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 29, 395–401 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cavalli, G. & Paro, R. The Drosophila Fab-7 chromosomal element conveys epigenetic inheritance during mitosis and meiosis. Cell 93, 505–518 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohd-Sarip, A., Venturini, F., Chalkley, G. E. & Verrijzer, C. P. Pleiohomeotic can link polycomb to DNA and mediate transcriptional repression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 7473–7483 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gabellini, D., Green, M. R. & Tupler, R. Inappropriate gene activation in FSHD: a repressor complex binds a chromosomal repeat deleted in dystrophic muscle. Cell 110, 339–348 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mosrin-Huaman, C., Canaple, L., Locker, D. & Decoville, M. DSP1 gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes an HMG-domain protein that plays multiple roles in development. Dev. Genet. 23, 324–334 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Franke, A. et al. Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J. 11, 2941–2950 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Orlando, V., Strutt, H. & Paro, R. Analysis of chromatin structure by in vivo formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods 11, 205–214 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Martin, C. H. et al. Complete sequence of the bithorax complex of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8398–8402 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to N. Riccò. We thank all laboratory members for input during the course of this work and for critical reading of the manuscript; F. Juge for developing the goat anti-PH antibody; P. Atger for artwork; R. Paro for the gift of rabbit anti-PH antibody; and V. Pirrotta for the gifts of anti-PHO and anti-E(Z). J.D and A.R. were supported by fellowships from the ‘Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche’ and by a grant from ‘La ligue nationale contre le cancer’. O.C. is supported by an HFSPO long-term fellowship. D.L. and M.D. are supported by grants from the CNRS. Research in the Cavalli laboratory is supported by grants from the CNRS, the HFSPO, the 6th EU Framework Project, the ‘Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale’, the ‘Fondation Schlumberger pour l'Éducation et la Recherche’ and the ‘Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Cavalli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure S1

PH recruitment to AbGAFm and AbPHOm. (PDF 256 kb)

Supplementary Figure S2

PHO recruitment to Ab-Fab and derivative constructs. (PDF 213 kb)

Supplementary Figure S3

Pairing sensitive effects correlate with GAF recruitment. (PDF 226 kb)

Supplementary Figure S4

E(Z) recruitment to Ab-Fab and derivative constructs. (PDF 203 kb)

Supplementary Figure S5

In vitro binding of DSP1 to the G(A) motif present into Ab-Fab. (PDF 642 kb)

Supplementary Figure S6

Effects of dsp11 background on PSA. (PDF 363 kb)

Supplementary Figure S7

dsp1 mutation affects PH recruitment at Ab-Fab (PDF 161 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Déjardin, J., Rappailles, A., Cuvier, O. et al. Recruitment of Drosophila Polycomb group proteins to chromatin by DSP1. Nature 434, 533–538 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03386

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing