Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals


Conventional models1,2,3,4 explaining extreme sexual ornaments propose that these reflect male genetic quality2,3,4 or are arbitrary results of genetic linkage between female preference and the ornament1. The chase-away model5 emphasizes sexual conflict: male signals attract females because they exploit receiver biases6,7,8,9. As males gain control of mating decisions, females may experience fitness costs through suboptimal mating rates or post-copulatory exploitation. Elaboration of male signals is expected if females increase their response threshold to resist such exploitation. If ornaments target otherwise adaptive biases such as feeding responses8,9,10, selection on females might eventually separate sexual and non-sexual responses to the signal. Here we show that the terminal yellow band (TYB) of several Goodeinae species evokes both feeding and sexual responses; sexual responsiveness phylogenetically pre-dates the expression of the TYB in males and is comparable across taxa, yet feeding responsiveness decreases in species with more elaborated TYBs. Displaying a TYB is costly, and thus provides an example where a trait arose as a sensory trap but has evolved into an honest signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type



Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Tail terminal yellow band in Goodeinae.
Figure 2: Female preference for males with elaborate TYBs.
Figure 3: Feeding responsiveness to tails with (+) and without a TYB (-).
Figure 4: Female responsiveness and male ornament elaboration.


  1. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection 146–156 (Dover Publications, New York, 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, M. Evolution of condition-dependent sex ornaments and mating preferences: sexual selection based on viability differences. Evolution 40, 804–816 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamilton, W. D. & Zuk, M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218, 384–387 (1982)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Milinski, M. & Bakker, T. C. M. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature 344, 330–333 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52, 1–7 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ryan, M. J. Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 7, 157–195 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, M. J. & Keddy-Hector, A. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am. Nat. 139, S4–S35 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawkins, M. S. & Guilford, T. Sensory bias and the adaptiveness of female choice. Am. Nat. 148, 937–942 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Endler, J. A. & Basolo, A. L. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415–420 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodd, F. H., Hughes, K. A., Grether, G. F. & Baril, C. T. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 475–481 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., McNamara, J. M. & Houston, A. I. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1331–1340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kokko, H., Brooks, R., Jennions, M. D. & Morley, J. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 653–664 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cordero, C. & Eberhard, W. G. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16, 1–6 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Webb, S. A. et al. Molecular phylogeny of the live-bearing Goodeidae (Cyprinodontiformes). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30, 527–544 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. LeBas, N., Hockham, L. R. & Ritchie, M. G. Nonlinear and correlational sexual selection on ‘honest’ female ornamentation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2159–2165 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kodric-Brown, A. Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25, 393–401 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olson, V. A. & Owens, I. P. F. Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 510–514 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Partridge, L. & Parker, G. A. in Evolution of Biological Diversity (eds Magurran, A. E. & May, R. M.) 130–159 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Basolo, A. L. Congruence between the sexes in preexisting receiver responses. Behav. Ecol. 13(6), 832–837 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jayasooriya, A. P., Weisinger, R. S., Weisinger, H. S., Mathai, M. L. & Sinclair, A. J. Attraction to orange: sexiness, not gluttony. Science 296, 847–848 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grether, G. F., Hughes, K. A. & Rodd, F. H. Response to Jayasooriya et al. Science 296, 847–848 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burton, B. G. & Laughlin, S. B. Neural images of pursuit targets in the photoreceptor arrays of male and female houseflies Musca domestica . J. Exp. Biol. 206, 3963–3977 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Córdoba-Aguilar, A. Sensory trap as the mechanism of sexual selection in a damselfly genitalic trait (insecta: calopterygidae). Am. Nat. 160, 594–601 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holland, B. & Rice, W. R. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5083–5088 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ryan, M. J. & Wagner, E. Asymmetries in mating preferences between species: female swordtails prefer heterospecific males. Science 236, 595–597 (1987)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Basolo, A. L. Evolutionary change in a receiver bias: a comparison of female preference functions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 2223–2228 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We Thank the Lunáticos behaviour discussion group for constructive discussion throughout, and M. Ritchie, J. Graves and H. Kokko for useful comments on previous versions of the manuscript. A. Gaona and M. Molina helped with some of the behavioural records, and E. Ávila Luna provided logistical aid with fish husbandry and data collection. This project was partly supported with a grant from CONACyT to C.M.G. and is based on E.R.'s BSc thesis (Biology), which was supervised by C.M.G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Constantino Macías Garcia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure S1

The left column shows the spectral reflectance of the sub-terminal tail band of males and females of each species. In the central column are the spectra of the terminal band and the last column shows the difference between the spectra in the first two columns. (PDF 241 kb)

Supplementary Figure S2

This file is an expanded version of Figure 2 from the main document. This includes one variable (frequency of visits to males with contrasting TYB conspicuousness) not included in Figure 2. (PDF 14 kb)

Supplementary Figure S3

This file is an expanded version of Figure 3 from the main document. This includes one variable (frequency of visits to tails with [ ] or without [ ] a TYB) that is not included in Figure 3. (PDF 52 kb)

Supplementary Figure S4

This shows the regression of rate of mass change on time in the experiment. This demonstrates that regenerating lost tail tissue is costly. The statistics of the regression analysis and its significance are provided in the main text. (PDF 14 kb)

Supplementary Figure S5

Supplementary Figure S5 shows four panels from a video sequence of male C. audax biting the tail of a fish (X. variata) showing a TYB while ignoring a tail lacking a TYB. Individual X. variata are hold in cages as described in Methods. (PDF 27 kb)

Supplementary Figure legends

Legends to accompany the above Supplementary Figures. (DOC 23 kb)

Supplementary Tables S1 and S2

This file contains Supplementary Table S1, which presents the ANOVA tables of all the tests (18) conducted to assess female sexual responsiveness for males with contrasting TYB. Supplementary Table S2 presents a full account of the results and statistics of the exposure of X. variata to elaborated TYB from heterospecific fish to test for feeding responses. The results are mentioned in the main text but expanded on here. (DOC 224 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garcia, C., Ramirez, E. Evidence that sensory traps can evolve into honest signals. Nature 434, 501–505 (2005).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing