Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 15 March 2007


The sense of taste provides animals with valuable information about the nature and quality of food. Bitter taste detection functions as an important sensory input to warn against the ingestion of toxic and noxious substances. T2Rs are a family of approximately 30 highly divergent G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)1,2 that are selectively expressed in the tongue and palate epithelium1 and are implicated in bitter taste sensing1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Here we demonstrate, using a combination of genetic, behavioural and physiological studies, that T2R receptors are necessary and sufficient for the detection and perception of bitter compounds, and show that differences in T2Rs between species (human and mouse) can determine the selectivity of bitter taste responses. In addition, we show that mice engineered to express a bitter taste receptor in ‘sweet cells’9 become strongly attracted to its cognate bitter tastants, whereas expression of the same receptor (or even a novel GPCR) in T2R-expressing cells resulted in mice that are averse to the respective compounds. Together these results illustrate the fundamental principle of bitter taste coding at the periphery: dedicated cells act as broadly tuned bitter sensors that are wired to mediate behavioural aversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Introduction of human bitter receptors expands the bitter taste repertoire of mice.
Figure 2: T2R5 is necessary for cycloheximide taste reception and perception. T2R5-/- mice show a strong and selective impairment in their ability to taste cycloheximide.
Figure 3: T2R-expressing cells are the mediators of bitter taste.
Figure 4: Switching the behavioural taste responses of mice by mis-expression of a bitter taste receptor.

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Adler, E. et al. A novel family of mammalian taste receptors. Cell 100, 693–702 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matsunami, H., Montmayeur, J. P. & Buck, L. B. A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse. Nature 404, 601–604 (2000)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrashekar, J. et al. T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors. Cell 100, 703–711 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bufe, B., Hofmann, T., Krautwurst, D., Raguse, J. D. & Meyerhof, W. The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta-glucopyranosides. Nature Genet. 32, 397–401 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, U. K. et al. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 299, 1221–1225 (2003)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Behrens, M. et al. The human taste receptor hTAS2R14 responds to a variety of different bitter compounds. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 319, 479–485 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pronin, A. N., Tang, H., Connor, J. & Keung, W. Identification of ligands for two human bitter T2R receptors. Chem. Senses 29, 583–593 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn, C. et al. Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K. J. Neurosci. 24, 10260–10265 (2004)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao, G. Q. et al. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell 115, 255–266 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, Y. et al. Coding of sweet, bitter, and umami tastes: different receptor cells sharing similar signaling pathways. Cell 112, 293–301 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caicedo, A. & Roper, S. D. Taste receptor cells that discriminate between bitter stimuli. Science 291, 1557–1560 (2001)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Farbman, A. I. Electron microscope study of the developing taste bud in rat fungiform papilla. Dev. Biol. 11, 110–135 (1965)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coward, P. et al. Controlling signaling with a specifically designed Gi-coupled receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 352–357 (1998)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Glendinning, J. I., Gresack, J. & Spector, A. C. A high-throughput screening procedure for identifying mice with aberrant taste and oromotor function. Chem. Senses 27, 461–474 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McBride, K., Slotnick, B. & Margolis, F. L. Does intranasal application of zinc sulfate produce anosmia in the mouse? An olfactometric and anatomical study. Chem. Senses 28, 659–670 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Franchini, L. F., Rubinstein, M. & Vivas, L. Reduced sodium appetite and increased oxytocin gene expression in mutant mice lacking beta-endorphin. Neuroscience 121, 875–881 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson, G. et al. Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell 106, 381–390 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahl, M., Erickson, R. P. & Simon, S. A. Neural responses to bitter compounds in rats. Brain Res. 756, 22–34 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nelson, G. et al. An amino-acid taste receptor. Nature 416, 199–202 (2002)

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Danilova, V. & Hellekant, G. Comparison of the responses of the chorda tympani and glossopharyngeal nerves to taste stimuli in C57BL/6J mice. BMC Neurosci. 4, 5 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nakashima, K. & Ninomiya, Y. Transduction for sweet taste of saccharin may involve both inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and cAMP pathways in the fungiform taste buds in C57BL mice. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 9, 90–98 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank F. Liu for help generating T2R5 knockout animals. We are also grateful to A. Cho and S. Taduru for generation of transgenic lines, and to A. Leslie for preparation of antibodies. We thank members of the Zuker and Ryba laboratories for valuable comments and advice. This work was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to C.S.Z. C.S.Z. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Charles S. Zuker or Nicholas J. P. Ryba.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure Legends

This file contains the figure legends for Supplementary Figures 1-3. (DOC 22 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

T2R5-/- construct and physiology. (PDF 84 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

T2R5-/- mice respond normally to a variety of bitter, sweet, umami, salty and sour stimuli. (PDF 56 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

T2R cells mediate bitter but not sweet or umami taste. (PDF 77 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mueller, K., Hoon, M., Erlenbach, I. et al. The receptors and coding logic for bitter taste. Nature 434, 225–229 (2005).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing