Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

An upper limit to the masses of stars

Abstract

There is no accepted upper mass limit for stars. Such a basic quantity eludes both theory and observation, because of an imperfect understanding of the star-formation process and because of incompleteness in surveying the Galaxy1. The Arches cluster2,3,4,5,6,7 is ideal for investigating such limits, being large enough to expect stars at least as massive as 500 solar masses ( 500 M; based on a typical mass function), and young enough for its most massive members to still be visible. It is also old enough to be free of its natal molecular cloud, it is at a well-established distance, and it is close enough for us to discern its individual stars2. Here I report an absence of stars with initial masses greater than 130 M in the Arches cluster, whereas the typical mass function predicts 18. I conclude that this indicates a firm limit of 150 M for stars; the probability that the observations are consistent with there being no upper limit is 10-8.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Observed frequency distribution and inferred masses of stars in the Arches cluster versus brightness.
Figure 2: Frequency distribution versus mass for stars in the Arches cluster extracted from data in Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elmegreen, B. G. Modeling a high-mass turn-down in the stellar initial mass function. Astrophys. J. 539, 342–351 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Figer, D. F. et al. HST/NICMOS observations of massive stellar clusters near the Galactic center. Astrophys. J. 525, 750–758 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Figer, D. F. et al. Massive stars in the Arches cluster. Astrophys. J. 581, 258–275 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagata, T., Woodward, C. E., Shure, M. & Kobayashi, N. Object 17: Another cluster of emission-line stars near the Galactic center. Astron. J. 109, 1676–1681 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cotera, A. S. et al. A new cluster of hot stars near the Galactic center. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 24, 1262 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blum, R. D. et al. 2 micron narrowband adaptive optics imaging in the Arches cluster. Astron. J. 122, 1875–1887 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Serabyn, E., Shupe, D. & Figer, D. F. An extraordinary cluster of massive stars near the centre of the Milky Way. Nature 394, 448–451 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwarzschild, M. & Harm, R. On the maximum mass of stable stars. Astrophys. J. 129, 637–646 (1959)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Beech, M. & Mitalas, R. Formation and evolution of massive stars. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 95, 517–534 (1994)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wolfire, M. G. & Cassinelli, J. P. Conditions for the formation of massive stars. Astrophys. J. 319, 850–867 (1987)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonnell, I. A., Bate, M. R. & Zinnecker, H. On the formation of massive stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 298, 93–102 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bond, J. R., Arnett, W. D. & Carr, B. J. The evolution and fate of very massive objects. Astrophys. J. 280, 825–847 (1984)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Figer, D. F. et al. The Pistol star. Astrophys. J. 506, 384–404 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Damineli, A. et al. η Carinae: binarity confirmed. Astrophys. J. 528, L101–L104 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Salpeter, E. E. The luminosity function and stellar evolution. Astrophys. J. 121, 161–167 (1955)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kroupa, P. The initial mass function of stars: evidence for uniformity in variable systems. Science 295, 82–91 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G. & Maeder, A. New grids of stellar models from 0.8 to 120 solar masses at Z = 0.020 and Z = 0.001. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 96, 269–331 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Najarro, F., Figer, D. F., Hillier, D. J. & Kudritzki, R. P. Metallicity in the Galactic center: The Arches cluster. Astrophys. J. 611, L105–L108 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stolte, A., Brandner, W., Brandl, B., Zinnecker, H. & Grebel, E. K. The secrets of the nearest starburst cluster. I. Very Large Telescope/ISAAC photometry of NGC 3603. Astron. J. 128, 765–786 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bohannan, B. & Crowther, P. Quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy of OF and WNL stars. Astrophys. J. 511, 374–388 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillier, D. J., Crowther, P. A., Najarro, F. & Fullerton, A. W. An optical and near-IR spectroscopic study of the extreme P Cygni-type supergiant HDE 316285. Astron. Astrophys. 340, 483–496 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Najarro, F. Massive stars in the galactic center. N. Astron. Rev. 44, 213–220 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stolte, A., Grebel, E. K., Brandner, W. & Figer, D. F. The mass function of the Arches cluster from Gemini adaptive optics data. Astron. Astrophys. 394, 459–478 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Walborn, N. R. et al. A new spectral classification system for the earliest O stars: Definition of type O2. Astron. J. 123, 2754–2771 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Figer, D. F., McLean, I. S. & Morris, M. Massive stars in the Quintuplet cluster. Astrophys. J. 514, 202–220 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Figer, D. F. & Kim, S. S. in Stellar Collisions, Mergers and their Consequences (ed. Shara, M.) 287–295 (ASP Conf. Ser. 263, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, San Francisco, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weidner, C. & Kroupa, P. Evidence for a fundamental stellar upper mass limit from clustered star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 348, 187–191 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Walborn, N. R., Maiz-Apellaniz, J. & Barba, R. H. Further insights into the structure of 30 Doradus from the Hubble Space Telescope instruments. Astron. J. 124, 1601–1624 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ramirez, S. V. et al. Stellar iron abundances at the Galactic center. Astrophys. J. 537, 205–220 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Boer, K. S., Fitzpatrick, E. L. & Savage, B. D. Abundances of O, Mg, S, Cr, Mn, Ti, Ni and Zn from absorption lines of neutral gas in the Large Magellanic Cloud in front of R136. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 217, 115–126 (1985)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I acknowledge discussions with P. Najarro, R. Larson, N. Walborn, J. Puls, N. Panagia, M. Morris, C. Weidner, P. Kroupa, R. M. Rich, V. Bromm and M. Livio.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald F. Figer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures 1-4 and Legends

Supplementary Figure 1: The Arches cluster, as imaged in infrared light with the Hubble Space Telescope Near-Infrared Camera and Multi-object Spectrometer. Supplementary Figure 2: Luminosity versus temperature for massive stars. Supplementary Figure 3: Present versus initial mass for massive stars at a variety of ages. Supplementary Figure 4: Results of Monte-Carlo simulation. (DOC 745 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Figer, D. An upper limit to the masses of stars. Nature 434, 192–194 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03293

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03293

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing