Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Public health vaccination policies for containing an anthrax outbreak


Concern about biological weapons has raised questions about the most effective public health policies to contain an anthrax outbreak1,2,3. We developed a probability model to predict the impact of different anthrax antibiotic and vaccination policies. An anthrax outbreak can be significantly contained by minimizing the delay until initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis. However, even if mass distribution of antibiotics is completed within six days of the initial exposure, then at most about 70% of cases can be prevented. Post-exposure vaccination will not significantly increase that prevention rate if adherence to antibiotic regimens is similar or higher than that attained in the 2001 US outbreak4. However, post-exposure vaccination can be useful either in shortening the duration of a prolonged antibiotic regimen, in the event of an antibiotic-resistant strain, or if antibiotic adherence rates are very low. Here we show that a mass pre-exposure vaccination programme for the general population would require very high population coverage rates to significantly increase prevention rates from that achieved with targeted and rapid post-exposure prophylaxis programmes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Percentage of cases prevented versus delay of initiating mass distribution of antibiotics.
Figure 2: Days that antibiotic therapy can be shortened by post-exposure vaccination versus vaccine efficacy.


  1. 1

    Inglesby, T. V. et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon: medical and public health management. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 281, 1735–1745 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Inglesby, T. V. et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon. Updated recommendations for management. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287, 2236–2252 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Centers for Disease Control. Notice to readers: use of anthrax vaccine in response to terrorism: supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 51, 1024–1026 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Jernigan, J. A. et al. Bioterrorism-related inhalation anthrax: The first 10 cases reported in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 17, 933–944 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Joellenbeck, L., Zwanziger, L., Durch, J. & Strom, B. (eds) The Anthrax Vaccine: Is it Safe? Does it Work? (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2002)

  6. 6

    National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases biodefense research agenda for CDC category A agents. 〈〉 (2002).

  7. 7

    Centers for Disease Control. Update: investigation of bioterrorism-related anthrax. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 50, 1008–1010 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Shepard, C. W. et al. Antimicrobial post-exposure prophylaxis for anthrax: Adverse events and adherence. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8, 1124–1132 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Brookmeyer, R. & Blades, N. Prevention of inhalational anthrax in the U.S. outbreak. Science 295, 1861 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Meselson, M. et al. The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979. Science 266, 1202–1208 (1994)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Wein, L. M., Craft, D. L. & Kaplan, E. H. Emergency response to an anthrax outbreak. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4346–4351 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Committee on Research and Development Needs for Improving Civilian Medical Response to Chemical and Biological Terrorism Incidents. Chemical and Biological Terrorism (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Kaplan, E. H., Craft, D. L. & Wein, L. M. Emergency response to a smallpox attack: the case for mass vaccination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10935–10940 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bozette, S. et al. A model for a smallpox-vaccination policy. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 416–425 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Halloran, M. E., Longini, I. M. Jr, Nizam, A. & Yang, Y. Containing bioterrorist smallpox. Science 298, 1428–1432 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ferguson, N. M. et al. Planning for smallpox outbreak. Nature 425, 681–685 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Fraser, C., Riley, S., Anderson, R. M. & Ferguson, N. M. Factors that make an infectious disease outbreak controllable. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6146–6151 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Kaufmann, A., Meltzer, M. & Schmid, G. The economic impact of a bioterrorist attack: Are prevention and post attack intervention programs justifiable? Emerg. Infect. Dis. 3, 83–94 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mass antibiotic dispensing: A primer. 〈〉 (June 2004).

  20. 20

    Brookmeyer, R., Johnson, E. & Bollinger, R. Modeling the optimum duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in an anthrax outbreak. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10129–10132 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Brachman, P. S. Inhalation anthrax. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 353, 83–93 (1980)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ross, J. M. The pathogenesis of anthrax following the administration of spores by the respiratory route. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 73, 484–494 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Friedlander, A. M. et al. Post-exposure prophylaxis against experimental inhalation anthrax. J. Infect. Dis. 167, 1239–1242 (1993)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Friedlander, A. M. Anthrax: clinical features, pathogenesis and potential biological warfare threat. Curr. Clin. Top. Infect. Dis. 20, 335–349 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Cieslak, T. J. & Edward, M. E. Clinical and epidemiological principles of anthrax. Infect. Dis. 5, 51–55 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Henderson, D. W., Peakcock, S. & Belton, F. C. Observations on the prophylaxis of experimental pulmonary anthrax in the monkey. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 54, 28–35 (1956)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Haas, C. N. On the risk of mortality to primates exposed to anthrax spores. Risk Anal. 22, 189–193 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Watson, A. & Keir, D. Information on which to base assessments of risk from environmental contaminated with anthrax spores. Epidemiol. Infect. 113, 479–490 (1994)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors acknowledge the comments of the Anthrax Modeling Working Group of the Secretary's Council on Public Health Preparedness of the Department of Health and Human Services. This research was partially funded by the Fogarty International Center and a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Brookmeyer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brookmeyer, R., Johnson, E. & Bollinger, R. Public health vaccination policies for containing an anthrax outbreak. Nature 432, 901–904 (2004).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing