Predator-induced behaviour shifts and natural selection in field-experimental lizard populations

Abstract

The role of behaviour in evolutionary change has long been debated. On the one hand, behavioural changes may expose individuals to new selective pressures by altering the way that organisms interact with the environment, thus driving evolutionary divergence1,2,3. Alternatively, behaviour can act to retard evolutionary change4,5,6: by altering behavioural patterns in the face of new environmental conditions, organisms can minimize exposure to new selective pressures. This constraining influence of behaviour has been put forward as an explanation for evolutionary stasis within lineages4,7,8,9 and niche conservatism within clades10,11. Nonetheless, the hypothesis that behavioural change prevents natural selection from operating in new environments has never been experimentally tested. We conducted a controlled and replicated experimental study of selection in entirely natural populations; we demonstrate that lizards alter their habitat use in the presence of an introduced predator, but that these behavioural shifts do not prevent patterns of natural selection from changing in experimental populations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Differences in proportion of animals observed on the ground in experimental and control populations.
Figure 2: Change in perch height (± 1 s.e.) 10 min after introduction of either a live predatory lizard (experimental) or an inanimate object of the same size (control).
Figure 3: Distribution of perch heights on experimental and control populations six months after the introduction of predatory curly-tailed lizards to experimental islands.
Figure 4: Selection gradients for male hindlimb length (a) and female snout–vent length (b).

References

  1. 1

    Wyles, J. S., Kunkel, J. G. & Wilson, A. C. Birds, behavior, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 4394–4397 (1983)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Wcislo, W. T. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137–169 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    West-Eberhard, M. J. Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 249–278 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Wake, D. B., Roth, G. & Wake, M. H. On the problem of stasis in organismal evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 101, 211–224 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Brandon, R. in The Role of Behavior in Evolution (ed. Plotkin, H. C.) 51–71 (MIT Press, Cambridge, USA, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Huey, R. B., Hertz, P. E. & Sinervo, B. Behavioral drive versus behavioral inertia in evolution: A null model approach. Am. Nat. 161, 357–366 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Eldredge, N. Macroevolutionary Dynamics: Species, Niches, & Adaptive Peaks (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Coope, G. R. in Extinction Rates (eds Lawton, J. H. & May, R. M.) 55–74 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Leviton, J. S. Genetics, Paleontology, and Macroevolution 2nd edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Harvey, P. H. & Pagel, M. D. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Schoener, T. W. Presence and absence of habitat shift in some widespread lizard species. Ecol. Monogr. 45, 233–258 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Pacala, S. W. & Roughgarden, J. Population experiments with the Anolis lizards of St. Maarten and St. Eustatius. Ecology 66, 129–141 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Losos, J. B. & Spiller, D. Differential colonization success and asymmetrical interactions between two lizard species. Ecology 80, 252–258 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Losos, J. B. Integrative approaches to evolutionary ecology: Anolis lizards as model systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25, 467–493 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Losos, J. B. Predators increase the risk of catastrophic extinction of prey populations. Nature 412, 183–186 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Schoener, T. W., Spiller, D. A. & Losos, J. B. Predation on a common Anolis lizard: Can the food-web effects of a devastating predator be reversed? Ecol. Monogr. 72, 383–408 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Schoener, T. W., Slade, J. B. & Stinson, C. H. Diet and sexual dimorphism in the very catholic lizard genus Leiocephalus of the Bahamas. Oecologia 53, 160–169 (1982)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Garland, T. Jr & Losos, J. B. in Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology (eds Wainwright, P. C. & Reilly, S.) 240–302 (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Lande, R. & Arnold, S. J. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37, 1210–1226 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Brodie, E. D. III, Moore, A. J. & Janzen, F. J. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 313–318 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Schoener, T. W. & Schoener, A. The ecological correlates of survival in some Bahamian Anolis lizards. Oikos 39, 1–16 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Williams, E. E. in Lizard Ecology: Studies of a Model Organism (eds Huey, R. B., Pianka, E. R. & Schoener, T. W.) 326–370 (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, USA, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Irschick, D. J. & Losos, J. B. Do lizards avoid habitats in which performance is submaximal?: The relationship between sprinting capabilities and structural habitat use in Caribbean anoles. Am. Nat. 154, 293–305 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Hurlbert, S. H. Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54, 187–211 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Janzen, F. J. & Stern, H. S. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multivariate selection. Evolution 52, 1564–1571 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    DeWitt, T. J. & Langerhans, R. B. Multiple prey traits, multiple predators: keys to understanding complex community dynamics. J. Sea Res. 49, 143–155 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Rundle, H. D., Vamosi, S. M. & Schluter, D. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14943–14948 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Bolnick, D. I. Can intraspecific competition drive disruptive selection? An experimental test in natural populations of sticklebacks. Evolution 58, 608–618 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Littell, R. C., Freund, R. J. & Spector, P. C. SAS System for Linear Models 3rd edn (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society for support, J. Chase, T. Knight and B. Pinder for assistance, R. B. Langerhans for suggesting the approach to study selection and helping in its implementation, D. Bolnick, J. Chase, B. Fitzpatrick, F. Janzen, T. Knight, B. Langerhans, M. Leal, M. Turelli and the Turelli labgroup, for constructive comments on previous drafts, and the Bahamian government for permission to conduct this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan B. Losos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods

This file provides information on how marginal recapture rates were calculated. (DOC 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Losos, J., Schoener, T. & Spiller, D. Predator-induced behaviour shifts and natural selection in field-experimental lizard populations. Nature 432, 505–508 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03039

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing