Letter | Published:

A superconductor to superfluid phase transition in liquid metallic hydrogen

Abstract

Although hydrogen is the simplest of atoms, it does not form the simplest of solids or liquids. Quantum effects in these phases are considerable (a consequence of the light proton mass) and they have a demonstrable and often puzzling influence on many physical properties1, including spatial order. To date, the structure of dense hydrogen remains experimentally elusive2. Recent studies of the melting curve of hydrogen3,4 indicate that at high (but experimentally accessible) pressures, compressed hydrogen will adopt a liquid state, even at low temperatures. In reaching this phase, hydrogen is also projected to pass through an insulator-to-metal transition. This raises the possibility of new state of matter: a near ground-state liquid metal, and its ordered states in the quantum domain. Ordered quantum fluids are traditionally categorized as superconductors or superfluids; these respective systems feature dissipationless electrical currents or mass flow. Here we report a topological analysis of the projected phase of liquid metallic hydrogen, finding that it may represent a new type of ordered quantum fluid. Specifically, we show that liquid metallic hydrogen cannot be categorized exclusively as a superconductor or superfluid. We predict that, in the presence of a magnetic field, liquid metallic hydrogen will exhibit several phase transitions to ordered states, ranging from superconductors to superfluids.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Hemley, R. J. & Mao, H.-K. Dense molecular hydrogen; order, disorder and localization. J. Non.-Cryst. Solids 205, 282–289 (1996)

  2. 2

    Ashcroft, N. W. The hydrogen liquids. J. Phys. A 12, A129–A137 (2000)

  3. 3

    Datchi, F., Loubeyre, P. & LeToullec, R. Extended and accurate determination of the melting curves of argon, helium, ice (H2O), and hydrogen (H2). Phys. Rev. B 61, 6535–6546 (2000)

  4. 4

    Bonev, S. A., Schwegler, E., Ogitsu, T. & Galli, G. A quantum fluid of metallic hydrogen. Nature (submitted)

  5. 5

    Guillot, T. Probing the giant planets. Phys. Today 57, 63–69 (2004)

  6. 6

    Stevenson, D. J., Ashcroft, N. W. Phys. Rev. A 9, 782–789 (1974)

  7. 7

    Ashcroft, N. W. Hydrogen dominant metallic alloys: High temperature superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 187002 (2004)

  8. 8

    Moulopolos, K. & Ashcroft, N. W. Generalized Coulomb pairing in condensed state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2915–2918 (1991)

  9. 9

    Babaev, E., Faddeev, L. D. & Niemi, A. J. Hidden symmetry and duality in a charged two-condensate Bose system. Phys. Rev. B 65, 100512 (2002)

  10. 10

    Babaev, E. Vortices with fractional flux in two-gap superconductors and in extended Faddeev model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067001 (2002)

  11. 11

    Jaffe, J. & Ashcroft, N. W. Superconductivity in liquid metallic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. B 23, 6176–6179 (1981)

  12. 12

    Jaffe, J. & Ashcroft, N. W. Critical fields of liquid superconducting metallic hydrogen. Phys. Rev. B 27, 5852–5855 (1983)

  13. 13

    Fossheim, K. & Sudbø, A. Superconductivity: Physics and Applications Ch. 8 (Wiley & Sons, New York, 2004)

  14. 14

    Smiseth, J., Smørgrav, E. & Sudbø, A. Critical properties of the N-color London model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 077002 (2004)

  15. 15

    Penrose, O. & Onsager, L. Bose-Einstein condensation and liquid helium. Phys. Rev. 104, 576–584 (1956)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation, the Research Council of Norway, NANOMAT and by STINT and the Swedish Research Council.

Author information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to Egor Babaev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: Local splitting of a composite vortex line in liquid metallic hydrogen, LMH.
Figure 2: A schematic phase diagram of LMH as a function of applied magnetic field B and temperature T.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.