Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males

Article metrics

Abstract

Sperm competition occurs when a female copulates with two or more males and the sperm of those males compete within the female's reproductive tract to fertilize her eggs1,2. The frequent occurrence of sperm competition has forced males of many species to develop different strategies to overcome the sperm of competing males1,3. A prevalent strategy is for males to increase their sperm investment (total number of sperm allocated by a male to a particular female) after detecting a risk of sperm competition1,3,4. It has been shown that the proportion of sperm that one male contributes to the sperm pool of a female is correlated with the proportion of offspring sired by that male5,6. Therefore, by increasing his sperm investment a male may bias a potential sperm competition in his favour5,7,8. Here we show that male meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, increase their sperm investment when they mate in the presence of another male's odours. Such an increase in sperm investment does not occur by augmenting the frequency of ejaculations, but by increasing the amount of sperm in a similar number of ejaculations.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Sperm investment in the RSC and the control context.
Figure 2: Sperm investment in relation to risk of sperm competition and male body weight.
Figure 3: Frequency of ejaculations in the control and the RSC contexts.

References

  1. 1

    Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. (eds) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic, San Diego, 1998)

  2. 2

    Smith, R. L. (ed.) Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (Academic, Orlando, 1984)

  3. 3

    Wedell, N., Gage, M. J. G. & Parker, G. A. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 313–320 (2002)

  4. 4

    Parker, G. A., Ball, M. A., Stockley, P. & Gage, M. J. G. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 1793–1802 (1997)

  5. 5

    Dewsbury, D. A. in Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith, R. L.) 547–571 (Academic, New York, 1984)

  6. 6

    Dziuk, P. J. Factors that influence the proportion of offspring sired by a male following heterospermic insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 43, 65–88 (1996)

  7. 7

    Ginsberg, J. R. & Huck, U. W. Sperm competition in mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 4, 74–79 (1989)

  8. 8

    Schwagmeyer, P. L. & Foltz, D. W. Factors affecting the outcome of sperm competition in thirteen-lined ground squirrels. Anim. Behav. 39, 156–162 (1990)

  9. 9

    Wedell, N. & Cook, P. A. Butterflies tailor their ejaculate in response to sperm competition risk and intensity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1033–1039 (1999)

  10. 10

    Gage, M. J. G. Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim. Behav. 42, 1036–1037 (1991)

  11. 11

    Pilastro, A., Scaggiante, M. & Rasotto, M. B. Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9913–9915 (2002)

  12. 12

    Pizzari, T., Cornwallis, C. K., Lovlie, H., Jakobsoon, S. & Birkhead, T. R. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426, 70–74 (2003)

  13. 13

    Baker, R. R. & Bellis, M. A. Human Sperm Competition 203–227 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995)

  14. 14

    Bellis, M. A., Baker, R. R. & Gage, M. J. G. Variation in rat ejaculates consistent with the Kamikaze-Sperm hypothesis. J. Mamm. 71, 479–480 (1990)

  15. 15

    Lezama, V., Orihuela, A. & Angulo, R. Sexual behavior and semen characteristics of rams exposed to their own semen or semen from a different ram on the vulva of the ewe. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75, 55–60 (2001)

  16. 16

    Dewsbury, D. A. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119, 601–610 (1982)

  17. 17

    Johnston, R. E. in Pheromones and Reproduction in Mammals (ed. Vandenbergh, J. G.) 3–37 (Academic, New York, 1983)

  18. 18

    Brown, R. E. & Macdonald, D. W. (eds) Social Odours in Mammals 1–36 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1985)

  19. 19

    Ferkin, M. H. & Johnston, R. E. Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition. Anim. Behav. 49, 37–44 (1995)

  20. 20

    Boonstra, R., Xia, X. & Pavone, L. Mating system of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Behav. Ecol. 4, 83–89 (1993)

  21. 21

    Dewsbury, D. A. Patterns of copulatory behavior in male mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 47, 1–33 (1972)

  22. 22

    Dewsbury, D. A. Diversity and adaptation in rodent copulatory behavior. Science 190, 947–954 (1975)

  23. 23

    Gray, G. D. & Dewsbury, D. A. A quantitative description of the copulation behaviour of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Anim. Behav. 23, 261–267 (1975)

  24. 24

    Pound, N. Effects of morphine on electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in two congeneric rodent species differing in sperm competition intensity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1755–1758 (1999)

  25. 25

    Parker, G. A. Sperm competition games: raffles and roles. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 242, 120–126 (1990)

  26. 26

    Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. Sperm Competition in Birds: Evolutionary Causes and Consequences (Academic, London, 1992)

  27. 27

    Simmons, L. W. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects 144–187 (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2001)

  28. 28

    Robb, G. W., Amann, R. P. & Killian, G. J. Daily sperm production and epididymal sperm reserves of pubertal and adult rats. J. Reprod. Fertil. 54, 103–107 (1978)

  29. 29

    Ferkin, M. H., Lee, D. N. & Leonard, S. T. The reproductive state of female voles affects their scent marking behavior and the responses of male conspecifics to such marks. Ethology 110, 257–272 (2004)

  30. 30

    Dewsbury, D. A. & Baumgardner, D. J. Studies of sperm competition in two species of muroid rodents. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9, 121–133 (1981)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research to J.d.-T., a NIH Grant to M.H.F. and a NIH Grant to the Tennessee Mouse Genome Consortium. J.d.-T. designed and carried out the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the paper; M.H.F. assisted in writing of the final drafts of the paper, as well as providing research facilities, animals and material.

Author information

Correspondence to Javier delBarco-Trillo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

delBarco-Trillo, J., Ferkin, M. Male mammals respond to a risk of sperm competition conveyed by odours of conspecific males. Nature 431, 446–449 (2004) doi:10.1038/nature02845

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.