Letter | Published:

Reading the Hedgehog morphogen gradient by measuring the ratio of bound to unbound Patched protein

Nature volume 431, pages 7680 (02 September 2004) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Morphogens are ‘form-generating’ substances that spread from localized sites of production and specify distinct cellular outcomes at different concentrations. A cell's perception of morphogen concentration is thought to be determined by the number of active receptors, with inactive receptors making little if any contribution1. Patched (Ptc)2,3,4,5, the receptor for the morphogen Hedgehog (Hh)6,7,8,9,10,11,12, is active in the absence of ligand and blocks the expression of target genes by inhibiting Smoothened (Smo), an essential transducer of the Hh signal3,13,14,15,16. Hh binding to Ptc abrogates the ability of Ptc to inhibit Smo, thereby unleashing Smo activity and inducing target gene expression2,3,12,13,14,15,16. Here, we show that a cell's measure of ambient Hh concentration is not determined solely by the number of active (unliganded) Ptc molecules. Instead, we find that Hh-bound Ptc can titrate the inhibitory action of unbound Ptc. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this effect is sufficient to allow normal reading of the Hh gradient in the presence of a form of Ptc that cannot bind the ligand12 but retains its ability to inhibit Smo. These results support a model in which the ratio of bound to unbound Ptc molecules determines the cellular response to Hh.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Morphogen gradient interpretation. Nature 413, 797–803 (2001)

  2. 2.

    , & Role of the Drosophila patched gene in positional signalling. Nature 353, 184–187 (1991)

  3. 3.

    & Dual roles for patched in sequestering and transducing Hedgehog. Cell 87, 553–563 (1996)

  4. 4.

    et al. The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 384, 129–134 (1996)

  5. 5.

    , , , & Biochemical evidence that patched is the Hedgehog receptor. Nature 384, 176–179 (1996)

  6. 6.

    & Compartment boundaries and the control of Drosophila limb pattern by hedgehog protein. Nature 368, 208–214 (1994)

  7. 7.

    & Hedgehog is a signaling protein with a key role in patterning Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 76, 89–102 (1994)

  8. 8.

    , , & The Drosophila segment polarity gene patched interacts with decapentaplegic in wing development. EMBO J. 13, 71–82 (1994)

  9. 9.

    , & Hedgehog organises the pattern and polarity of epidermal cells in the Drosophila abdomen. Development 124, 2143–2154 (1997)

  10. 10.

    , , & Hedgehog activity, independent of decapentaplegic, participates in wing disc patterning. Development 124, 1227–1237 (1997)

  11. 11.

    & A Hedgehog activity gradient contributes to AP axial patterning of the Drosophila wing. Development 124, 4697–4705 (1997)

  12. 12.

    , , & A hedgehog-insensitive form of patched provides evidence for direct long-range morphogen activity of sonic hedgehog in the neural tube. Mol. Cell 7, 1279–1291 (2001)

  13. 13.

    Distinct pathways for autocrine and paracrine Wingless signalling in Drosophila embryos. Nature 372, 461–464 (1994)

  14. 14.

    & smoothened encodes a receptor-like serpentine protein required for hedgehog signalling. Nature 382, 547–551 (1996)

  15. 15.

    , , , & The Drosophila smoothened gene encodes a seven-pass membrane protein, a putative receptor for the hedgehog signal. Cell 86, 221–232 (1996)

  16. 16.

    & Hedgehog signaling in animal development: paradigms and principles. Genes Dev. 15, 3059–3087 (2001)

  17. 17.

    , , & Patched acts catalytically to suppress the activity of Smoothened. Nature 418, 892–897 (2002)

  18. 18.

    & Morphogens, compartments, and pattern: lessons from Drosophila? Cell 85, 951–961 (1996)

  19. 19.

    et al. A protein with several possible membrane-spanning domains encoded by the Drosophila segment polarity gene patched. Nature 341, 508–513 (1989)

  20. 20.

    & The Drosophila patched gene encodes a putative membrane protein required for segmental patterning. Cell 59, 751–765 (1989)

  21. 21.

    , , & The COE transcription factor Collier is a mediator of short-range Hedgehog-induced patterning of the Drosophila wing. Curr. Biol. 9, 632–639 (1999)

  22. 22.

    , & Posttranscriptional regulation of smoothened is part of a self-correcting mechanism in the Hedgehog signaling system. Mol. Cell 6, 457–465 (2000)

  23. 23.

    , , & Hedgehog induces opposite changes in turnover and subcellular localization of patched and smoothened. Cell 102, 521–531 (2000)

  24. 24.

    et al. Patched represses the Hedgehog signalling pathway by promoting modification of the Smoothened protein. Curr. Biol. 10, 1315–1318 (2000)

  25. 25.

    , , , & Drosophila cubitus interruptus forms a negative feedback loop with patched and regulates expression of Hedgehog target genes. Development 124, 549–558 (1997)

  26. 26.

    & Ci: a complex transducer of the hedgehog signal. Trends Genet. 15, 458–462 (1999)

  27. 27.

    & Hedgehog controls limb development by regulating the activities of distinct transcriptional activator and repressor forms of Cubitus interruptus. Cell 96, 819–831 (1999)

  28. 28.

    , , & Crystal structure of bacterial multidrug efflux transporter AcrB. Nature 419, 587–593 (2002)

  29. 29.

    & Different levels of Ras activity can specify distinct transcriptional and morphological consequences in early Drosophila embryos. Development 124, 4879–4886 (1997)

  30. 30.

    & Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron 22, 451–461 (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Adachi for generating transgenic flies; X.-J. Qiu for technical assistance; and R. Axel, E. Gouaux, I. Greenwald, T. Jessell, L. Johnston, R. Mann and A. Tomlinson for discussion and advice on the manuscript. A.C. is a Postdoctoral Associate and G.S. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA

    • Andreu Casali
    •  & Gary Struhl

Authors

  1. Search for Andreu Casali in:

  2. Search for Gary Struhl in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Struhl.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02835

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.