Letter | Published:

A Middle Jurassic ‘sphenosuchian’ from China and the origin of the crocodylian skull

Nature volume 430, pages 10211024 (26 August 2004) | Download Citation



The skull of living crocodylians is highly solidified and the jaw closing muscles are enlarged1, allowing for prey capture by prolonged crushing between the jaws. Living species are all semi-aquatic, with sprawling limbs and a broad body that moves mainly from side-to-side2; however, fossils indicate that they evolved from terrestrial forms. The most cursorial of these fossils3,4,5,6 are small, gracile forms often grouped together as the Sphenosuchia, with fully erect, slender limbs; their relationships, however, are poorly understood5,7,8,9,10. A new crocodylomorph from deposits in northwestern China of the poorly known Middle Jurassic epoch possesses a skull with several adaptations typical of living crocodylians. Postcranially it is similar to sphenosuchians but with even greater adaptations for cursoriality in the forelimb. Here we show, through phylogenetic analysis, that it is the closest relative of the large group Crocodyliformes, including living crocodylians. Thus, important features of the modern crocodylian skull evolved during a phase when the postcranial skeleton was evolving towards greater cursoriality, rather than towards their current semi-aquatic habitus.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    in Biology of the Reptilia (eds Gans, C. & Parsons, T. S.) Vol. 4 201–262 (Academic, New York, 1973)

  2. 2.

    & in Crocodilian Biology and Evolution (eds Grigg, G. C., Seebacher, F. & Franklin, C. E.) 85–134 (Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia, 2001)

  3. 3.

    A revision of the Jurassic reptile Hallopus victor (Marsh), with remarks on the classification of crocodiles. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 323–372 (1970)

  4. 4.

    The origin of crocodylian locomotion. Paleobiol. 13, 396–414 (1987)

  5. 5.

    & Procompsognathus: theropod, ‘thecodont’ or both? J. Vert. Paleontol. 12, 435–458 (1992)

  6. 6.

    & Two new species of basal crocodylomorphs and the status of the Sphenosuchia. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 77–96 (2002)

  7. 7.

    & in The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods (ed. Benton, M. J.) Vol. 1 295–338 (Clarendon, London, 1988)

  8. 8.

    & Dibothrosuchus elaphros, a crocodylomorph from the Lower Jurassic of China and the phylogeny of the Sphenosuchia. J. Vert. Paleontol. 13, 58–89 (1993)

  9. 9.

    , & A new specimen of Hesperosuchus agilis from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico and the interrelationships of basal crocodylomorph archosaurs. J. Vert. Paleontol. 20, 683–704 (2001)

  10. 10.

    , , & A new crocodylomorph archosaur from the Upper Triassic of North Carolina. J. Vert. Paleontol. 23, 329–343 (2003)

  11. 11.

    in In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods (eds Fraser, N. & Sues, H.-D.) 84–97 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1994)

  12. 12.

    , & Solution to the Hallopus enigma? Am. J. Sci. 295, 1–17 (1995)

  13. 13.

    Clark, J.M. & Xu, X. Dinosaurs from Xinjiang, China 〈〉 (2001–2003).

  14. 14.

    Closure of neurocentral sutures during crocodylian ontogeny: implications for maturity assessment in fossil archosaurs. J. Vert. Paleontol. 16, 49–62 (1996)

  15. 15.

    The evolution of the avian shoulder joint. Am. J. Sci. A 293, 253–267 (1993)

  16. 16.

    & Ontogeny of the limb skeleton in Alligator mississippiensis: developmental invariance and change in the evolution of archosaur limbs. J. Morphol. 203, 151–164 (1990)

  17. 17.

    & Analysis of Vertebrate Structure (Wiley, New York, 2001)

  18. 18.

    et al. Sequence stratigraphy, paleoclimate patterns and vertebrate fossil distributions in Jurassic–Cretaceous strata of the Junggar Basin, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, PR China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 38, 1627–1644 (2001)

  19. 19.

    in The Continental Jurassic (ed. Morales, M.) 395–412 (Museum of Northern Arizona Bulletin 60, Flagstaff, 1996)

  20. 20.

    Chinese Fossil Vertebrates (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 2001)

  21. 21.

    & Erpetosuchus, a crocodile-like basal archosaur from the Late Triassic of Elgin, Scotland. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 136, 25–47 (2002)

  22. 22.

    , & Gobiosuchus kielanae (Protosuchia) from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia: anatomy and relationships. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 42, 257–289 (1997)

  23. 23.

    PAUP*Beta 10 Software (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2003)

Download references


Field work was supported by the National Geographic Society, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Jurassic Foundation, the Hilmar Sallee bequest, George Washington University and the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Study of the specimen was supported by the National Science Foundation Division of Earth Sciences. We thank D. Ma and W. Chen of the Changji Autonomous Prefecture and M. Zhu and X. Zhao of the IVPP for facilitating our work.

Author information

Author notes

    • Xing Xu

    Present address: Department of Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History, 79th Street at Central Park West, New York 10024, USA


  1. Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington DC 20052, USA

    • James M. Clark
  2. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 142 Xiwai Street, Beijing, 100044, China

    • Xing Xu
    •  & Yuan Wang
  3. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

    • Catherine A. Forster


  1. Search for James M. Clark in:

  2. Search for Xing Xu in:

  3. Search for Catherine A. Forster in:

  4. Search for Yuan Wang in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Clark.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Containins the characters used in the phylogenetic analysis of Junggarsuchus and their distributions among 14 taxa of crocodylomorphs.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.