Letter | Published:

The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx

Nature volume 430, pages 666669 (05 August 2004) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Archaeopteryx, the earliest known flying bird (avialan) from the Late Jurassic period, exhibits many shared primitive characters with more basal coelurosaurian dinosaurs (the clade including all theropods more bird-like than Allosaurus)1, such as teeth, a long bony tail and pinnate feathers2. However, Archaeopteryx possessed asymmetrical flight feathers on its wings and tail, together with a wing feather arrangement shared with modern birds. This suggests some degree of powered flight capability3 but, until now, little was understood about the extent to which its brain and special senses were adapted for flight. We investigated this problem by computed tomography scanning and three-dimensional reconstruction of the braincase of the London specimen of Archaeopteryx. Here we show the reconstruction of the braincase from which we derived endocasts of the brain and inner ear. These suggest that Archaeopteryx closely resembled modern birds in the dominance of the sense of vision and in the possession of expanded auditory and spatial sensory perception in the ear. We conclude that Archaeopteryx had acquired the derived neurological and structural adaptations necessary for flight. An enlarged forebrain suggests that it had also developed enhanced somatosensory integration with these special senses demanded by a lifestyle involving flying ability4.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 8, 91–182 (1976)

  2. 2.

    , , , & The distribution of integumentary structures in a feathered dinosaur. Nature 410, 1084–1088 (2001)

  3. 3.

    & The origin and early evolution of birds. Biol. Rev. 73, 1–42 (1998)

  4. 4.

    in Brain Evolution and Cognition (eds Roth, G. & Wulliman, M. F.) 135–184 (Wiley, New York, 2001)

  5. 5.

    & Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery applications to the geosciences. Comp. Geosci. 27, 381–400 (2001)

  6. 6.

    Preparation of the cranium of the holotype of Archaeopteryx lithographica from the collections of the British Museum (Natural History). Neues Jb. Geol. Palaeont. Mh. 3, 184–192 (1982)

  7. 7.

    Braincase of Mesozoic birds: 1. New preparation of the ‘London’ Archaeopteryx. J. Vert. Paleo. 2, 439–452 (1983)

  8. 8.

    in The Beginnings of Birds. Proceedings of the International Archaeopteryx Conference, Eichstatt 1984 (eds Hecht, M. K., Ostrom, J. H., Wellnhofer, P. & Viohl, G.) 123–134 (Freunde des Jura-Museums Eichstatt, Eichstatt, 1985)

  9. 9.

    & Cranial morphology of Archaeopteryx: evidence from the seventh skeleton. J. Vert. Paleo. 16, 81–94 (1996)

  10. 10.

    in Mesozoic Birds. Above the Heads of Dinosaurs (eds Chiappe, L. M. & Witmer, L. M.) 129–159 (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 2002)

  11. 11.

    The craniofacial air sac system of Mesozoic birds (Aves). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 100, 327–378 (1990)

  12. 12.

    in Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs (eds Currie, P. J. & Padian, K.) 151–159 (Academic, San Diego, 1997)

  13. 13.

    Brain evolution and Archaeopteryx. Nature 219, 1381–1382 (1968)

  14. 14.

    Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence (Academic, New York, 1973)

  15. 15.

    Relative brain size and behaviour in archosaurian reptiles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8, 429–448 (1977)

  16. 16.

    in Biology of the Reptilia Vol. 9 Neurology A (eds Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G. & Ulinsky, P.) 1–38 (Academic, London, 1979)

  17. 17.

    & Can endocranial volume be used as an estimate of brain size in birds? Can. J. Zool. 80, 16–23 (2002)

  18. 18.

    in Biology of the Reptilia. Vol. 9 Neurology A (eds Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G. & Ulinsky, P.) 39–147 (Academic, London, 1979)

  19. 19.

    , , & Neuroanatomy of flying reptiles and implications for flight, posture and behaviour. Nature 425, 950–953 (2003)

  20. 20.

    in The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates (eds Nieuwenhuys, R., ten Donkelaar, H. J. & Voogd, J.) Vol. 3 1525–1636 (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

  21. 21.

    & Braincase of Enaliornis, an Early Cretaceous bird from England. J. Vert. Paleo. 11, 90–107 (1991)

  22. 22.

    The Reptile Ear. Its Structure and Function (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1978)

  23. 23.

    The Labyrinth of Animals Including Mammals, Birds, Reptiles and Amphibians Vol. II (J & A Churchill, London, 1908)

  24. 24.

    & in Comparative Hearing: Birds and Reptiles (eds Dooling, R. J., Fay, R. R. & Popper, A. N.) 70–138 (Springer, New York, 2000)

  25. 25.

    The Avian Brain (Academic, London, 1972)

  26. 26.

    Osteology of Tyrannosaurus rex: insights from a nearly complete skeleton and high-resolution computed tomographic analysis of the skull. Mem. Soc. Vert. Paleo. 7, 1–138 (2003)

  27. 27.

    Evolution of the Brain in Theropoda (Dinosauria) PhD dissertation, Univ. Texas (2004)

  28. 28.

    , & Paired gill slits in a fossil with a calcite skeleton. Nature 417, 841–844 (2002)

  29. 29.

    in Biology of the Reptilia (eds Gans, C., Northcutt, R. G. & Ulinsky, P.) Vol. 9 Neurology A 147–171 (Academic, London, 1979)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank UTCT and NSF for funding CT scanning, and M. Colbert and J. Maisano (UTCT) for technical assistance. L. M. Witmer provided constructive comment and criticism. NERC funded the project, and the NHM Palaeontology Department Research Fund provided supplementary funds for P.D.A. We dedicate this paper to the memory of P. J. Whybrow, formerly Head of the Palaeontology Laboratory at the Natural History Museum London, who died suddenly on 13 February 2004. His skilled preparation work, undertaken long before the advent of CT technology, made this project possible.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Paleontologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaría, 28040 Madrid, Spain

    • Patricio Domínguez Alonso
  2. Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK

    • Angela C. Milner
  3. High-resolution X-ray CT Facility,

    • Richard A. Ketcham
  4. Department of Geological Sciences, 1 University Station C1110, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA

    • Timothy B. Rowe
  5. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Herts AL10 9AB, UK

    • M. John Cookson

Authors

  1. Search for Patricio Domínguez Alonso in:

  2. Search for Angela C. Milner in:

  3. Search for Richard A. Ketcham in:

  4. Search for M. John Cookson in:

  5. Search for Timothy B. Rowe in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela C. Milner.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Table 1

    Data on body mass and endocranial volume of selected modern birds and reptiles in comparison with Archaeopteryx. Data sources are referenced in the main text of the paper.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Table 2

    Measurements and proportions of the inner ear of selected modem birds, non-archosaur and archosaur reptiles in comparison with Archaeopteryx. Data sources are referenced at the end of the table.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    Braincase reconstruction movie: Movie of the 3D reconstruction of the braincase of Archaeopteryx. The braincase has been restored by reversing the elements of the left side to model the whole structure.

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Quadrate movie: Movie of the right quadrate of Archaeopteryx. The element is depicted exactly as it was preserved in the matrix, partly fragmented but all fragments in natural association.

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    Brain endocast movie: Movie of the restored endocast of the brain of Archaeopteryx. The endocast has been restored by reversing the elements of the left side to model the whole structure. It has been rendered as a shell since the base of the braincase is absent.

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    Inner ear movie: Video clip of the 3D model of the right inner ear of Archaeopteryx lithographica (BMNH 37001). Missing parts of the semicircular canals indicated by blue connecting lines.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02706

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.