Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production


The human population and its consumption profoundly affect the Earth's ecosystems1,2. A particularly compelling measure of humanity's cumulative impact is the fraction of the planet's net primary production that we appropriate for our own use3,4. Net primary production—the net amount of solar energy converted to plant organic matter through photosynthesis—can be measured in units of elemental carbon and represents the primary food energy source for the world's ecosystems. Human appropriation of net primary production, apart from leaving less for other species to use, alters the composition of the atmosphere5, levels of biodiversity6, energy flows within food webs7 and the provision of important ecosystem services8. Here we present a global map showing the amount of net primary production required by humans and compare it to the total amount generated on the landscape. We then derive a spatial balance sheet of net primary production ‘supply’ and ‘demand’ for the world. We show that human appropriation of net primary production varies spatially from almost zero to many times the local primary production. These analyses reveal the uneven footprint of human consumption and related environmental impacts, indicate the degree to which human populations depend on net primary production ‘imports’ and suggest policy options for slowing future growth of human appropriation of net primary production.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Spatial distribution of the annual NPP resources required by the human population.


  1. Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. M. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wackernagel, M. et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9266–9271 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P., Ehrlich, A. & Matson, P. M. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience 36, 368–373 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rojstaczer, S., Sterling, S. M. & Moore, N. J. Human appropriation of photosynthesis products. Science 294, 2549–2552 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schimel, D. et al. Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. Science 287, 2004–2006 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haberl, H. Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development. Ambio 26, 143–146 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Field, C. B. Global change: Enhanced: Sharing the garden. Science 294, 2490–2491 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daily, G. C. et al. Ecosystem services: benefits supplied to human societies by natural ecosystems. Issues Ecol. 2, 1–16 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. O'Neill, R. V. & Kahn, J. R. Homo economus as a keystone species. Bioscience 50, 333–337 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haberl, H., Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H. & Schulz, N. B. Human appropriation of net primary production. Science 296, 1968–1969 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT 2001 Database (UNFAO, Rome, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Gridded Population of the World (GPW) version 2 (Columbia Univ.; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI); and World Resources Institute, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Potter, C. S. et al. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 7, 811–841 (1993)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Slayback, D. A., Pinzon, J. E., Los, S. O. & Tucker, C. J. Northern hemisphere photosynthetic trends: 1982–99. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 1–15 (2003)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cramer, W. et al. Comparing global models of terrestrial primary productivity (NPP): overview and key results. Glob. Change Biol. 5(Suppl. 1), 1–15 (1999)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luck, M. A., Jenerette, G. D., Wu, J. G. & Grimm, N. B. The urban funnel model and spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint. Ecosystems 4, 782–796 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. van den Bergh, J. & Verbruggen, H. Spatial sustainability, trade, and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecol. Econ. 29, 61–72 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Holdren, J. P. & Ehrlich, P. R. Human population and global environment. Am. Sci. 62, 282–292 (1974)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. United Nations Population Division World Population Prospects: The 2000 Revision and The World Population in 2003 (United Nations Population Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. World Resources Institute Disappearing Food: How Big are Postharvest Losses? (World Resources Institute Sustainable Development Information Service, Washington DC, 1998); available at 〈

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Padua, D. B. in Accelerating Agricultural Development (eds Drilon, J. D. & Sanguiguit, G. F.) 135–154 (SERCA College, Laguna, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smil, V. Biomass Energies: Resources, Links, Constraints (Plenum, New York, 1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Ince, P. J. Industrial Wood Productivity in the United States 1900–1998 (Research Note FPL-RN-0272, USDA Forest Service, Madison, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Pulkki, R. E. Literature Synthesis on Logging Impacts in Moist Tropical Forests (working paper GFSS/WP/06, Forest Products Division, UNFAO, Rome, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Skog, K. E., Ince, P. J. & Haynes, R. W. Wood fiber supply and demand in the United States. Proc. N. Am. For. Comm. [online] 〈〉, 1998

  26. Sere, C. & Steinfeld, H. World Livestock Production Systems (Animal Production and Health Paper 127, FAO, Rome, 1996); available at 〈

    Google Scholar 

  27. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Animal Agriculture and Global Food Supply (Task Force Report R135, Ames, 1999); available at 〈

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oltjen, J. W., George, M. R. & Drake, D. J. in Computers in Agricultural Extension Program (eds Watson, D. G., Zazuelta, F. S. & Bottcher, A. B.) 58–63 (American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lieth, H. in Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (eds Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H.) 119–130 (Springer, New York, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank K. Carney, N. Christiansen, G. Daily, R. Defries, J. Hellmann, J. Hicke, G. Orians, N. Sanders, P. Vitousek, P. Matson and P. Ehrlich for comments, C. Tucker for providing satellite data, and G. Asrar, J. Kaye, G. Gutman and D. Wickland of the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc L. Imhoff.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imhoff, M., Bounoua, L., Ricketts, T. et al. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production. Nature 429, 870–873 (2004).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing