Subjects

Abstract

Water availability limits plant growth and production in almost all terrestrial ecosystems1,2,3,4,5. However, biomes differ substantially in sensitivity of aboveground net primary production (ANPP) to between-year variation in precipitation6,7,8. Average rain-use efficiency (RUE; ANPP/precipitation) also varies between biomes, supposedly because of differences in vegetation structure and/or biogeochemical constraints8. Here we show that RUE decreases across biomes as mean annual precipitation increases. However, during the driest years at each site, there is convergence to a common maximum RUE (RUEmax) that is typical of arid ecosystems. RUEmax was also identified by experimentally altering the degree of limitation by water and other resources. Thus, in years when water is most limiting, deserts, grasslands and forests all exhibit the same rate of biomass production per unit rainfall, despite differences in physiognomy and site-level RUE. Global climate models9,10 predict increased between-year variability in precipitation, more frequent extreme drought events, and changes in temperature. Forecasts of future ecosystem behaviour should take into account this convergent feature of terrestrial biomes.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: prediction from climatological data. Am. Nat. 102, 67–74 (1968)

  2. 2.

    in Primary Productivity of the Biosphere (eds Lieth, H. & Whittaker, R. H.) 237–263 (Springer, New York, 1975)

  3. 3.

    , , & Primary production and abiotic controls in forests, grasslands, and desert ecosystems of the United States. Ecology 64, 134–151 (1986)

  4. 4.

    , , & Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69, 40–45 (1988)

  5. 5.

    Grassland, Savanne und Busch der arideren Teile Afrikas in ihrer okologischen Bedingtheit. Jb. Wiss. Bot. 87, 750–760 (1939)

  6. 6.

    , , & Grassland precipitation–use efficiency varies across a resource gradient. Ecosystems 2, 64–68 (1999)

  7. 7.

    & Variation among biomass in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291, 481–484 (2001)

  8. 8.

    , , & Environmental controls of primary production in agricultural systems of the Argentine Pampas. Ecosystems 5, 625–635 (2002)

  9. 9.

    . Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Watson, R. T. and Core Writing Team) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001)

  10. 10.

    et al. Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science 289, 2068–2074 (2000)

  11. 11.

    et al. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems. Nature 414, 169–172 (2001)

  12. 12.

    Desert ecosystems: environment and producers. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 51–58 (1973)

  13. 13.

    et al. Elevated CO2 increases productivity and invasive species success in an arid ecosystem. Nature 408, 79–82 (2000)

  14. 14.

    et al. Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298, 1987–1990 (2002)

  15. 15.

    & Long-term forage production of North American shortgrass steppe. Ecol. Appl. 2, 397–403 (1992)

  16. 16.

    Evidence for existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111, 1169–1194 (1977)

  17. 17.

    in Terrestrial Global Productivity (eds Roy, J., Saugier, B. & Mooney, H. A.) 345–362 (Academic, San Diego, 2001)

  18. 18.

    & Consequences of nonequilibrium resource availability across multiple time scales: the transient maxima hypothesis. Am. Nat. 141, 421–433 (1993)

  19. 19.

    & Nutrient dynamics on a precipitation gradient in Hawai'i. Oecologia 113, 519–529 (1998)

  20. 20.

    , & Principles of Terrestrial Ecosystem Ecology (Springer, New York, 2002)

  21. 21.

    et al. Rainfall variability, carbon cycling, and plant species diversity in a mesic grassland. Science 298, 2202–2205 (2003)

  22. 22.

    Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change (Academic, San Diego, 1997)

  23. 23.

    , & Physiological Ecology of North American Desert Plants (Springer, New York, 1997)

  24. 24.

    et al. Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 48, 921–934 (1998)

  25. 25.

    & in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology (New Series) vol 12C (eds Lange, O. L., Nobel, P. S., Osmond, C. B. & Ziegler, H.) 205–231 (Springer, New York, 1983)

  26. 26.

    et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247, 1043–1048 (1990)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Impact of drought on desert shrubs: effects of seasonality and degree of resource island development. Ecol. Monogr. 69, 69–106 (1999)

  28. 28.

    , & Relationship between the variability of primary production and the variability of annual precipitation in world arid lands. J. Arid Environ. 15, 1–18 (1998)

  29. 29.

    & Net production by shrubs and winter annuals in southern Nevada. J. Arid Environ. 17, 23–36 (1989)

  30. 30.

    & Controls of grass and shrub aboveground production in the Patagonian steppe. Ecol. Appl. 10, 541–549 (2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Bronstein, J. Cable, G. Davidowitz, A. Eilts, B. Enquist, D. Ignace, A. Kerkhoff, D. Potts, D. Schimel, L. Venable and M. Pavao-Zuckerman for comments on the manuscript. This work derived from an NCEAS working group, PrecipNet (principal investigator M.E.L.), supported by the National Science Foundation, the University of California, and the Santa Barbara campus. We acknowledge the support of the United States Department of Energy, the National Park Service, the National Science Foundation, and the United States Department of Agriculture.

Author information

Author notes

    • Travis E. Huxman
    •  & Melinda D. Smith

    These authors contributed equally to this work

Affiliations

  1. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA

    • Travis E. Huxman
  2. National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, Santa Barbara, California 93101, USA

    • Melinda D. Smith
  3. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, USA

    • Melinda D. Smith
  4. Natural Resources Research Institute, Duluth, Minnesota 55811, USA

    • Philip A. Fay
  5. Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA

    • Alan K. Knapp
  6. Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California 94305, USA

    • M. Rebecca Shaw
  7. Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA

    • Michael E. Loik
    •  & Brent M. Haddad
  8. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA

    • Stanley D. Smith
  9. Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA

    • David T. Tissue
    •  & John C. Zak
  10. Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37919, USA

    • Jake F. Weltzin
  11. Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA

    • William T. Pockman
  12. Department of Ecology and IFEVA, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1417DSE, Argentina

    • Osvaldo E. Sala
  13. Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • John Harte
  14. Biological Sciences and Merriam-Powell Center for Environmental Research, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011, USA

    • George W. Koch
  15. Biosphere 2 Center, Columbia University, Oracle, Arizona 85623, USA

    • Susan Schwinning
  16. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA

    • Eric E. Small
  17. Renewable Resources and Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA

    • David G. Williams

Authors

  1. Search for Travis E. Huxman in:

  2. Search for Melinda D. Smith in:

  3. Search for Philip A. Fay in:

  4. Search for Alan K. Knapp in:

  5. Search for M. Rebecca Shaw in:

  6. Search for Michael E. Loik in:

  7. Search for Stanley D. Smith in:

  8. Search for David T. Tissue in:

  9. Search for John C. Zak in:

  10. Search for Jake F. Weltzin in:

  11. Search for William T. Pockman in:

  12. Search for Osvaldo E. Sala in:

  13. Search for Brent M. Haddad in:

  14. Search for John Harte in:

  15. Search for George W. Koch in:

  16. Search for Susan Schwinning in:

  17. Search for Eric E. Small in:

  18. Search for David G. Williams in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Travis E. Huxman or Melinda D. Smith.

Supplementary information

Word documents

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Tables

    Table 1) Site information, mean annual precipitation, mean annual net primary production for the 14 study sites; Table 2) Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis of aboveground net primary production using annual precipitation, measures of intra-annual precipitation variability, maximum growing season temperature, and previous yr ANPP, for the 14 study sites categorized by their long-term mean ANPP.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02561

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.