Letter | Published:

Enhanced partner preference in a promiscuous species by manipulating the expression of a single gene

Nature volume 429, pages 754757 (17 June 2004) | Download Citation



The molecular mechanisms underlying the evolution of complex behaviour are poorly understood. The mammalian genus Microtus provides an excellent model for investigating the evolution of social behaviour. Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster) exhibit a monogamous social structure in nature, whereas closely related meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) are solitary and polygamous1. In male prairie voles, both vasopressin and dopamine act in the ventral forebrain to regulate selective affiliation between adult mates, known as pair bond formation, as assessed by partner preference in the laboratory2,3,4. The vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) is expressed at higher levels in the ventral forebrain of monogamous than in promiscuous vole species5, whereas dopamine receptor distribution is relatively conserved between species. Here we substantially increase partner preference formation in the socially promiscuous meadow vole by using viral vector V1aR gene transfer into the ventral forebrain. We show that a change in the expression of a single gene in the larger context of pre-existing genetic and neural circuits can profoundly alter social behaviour, providing a potential molecular mechanism for the rapid evolution of complex social behaviour.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    & Comparison of the mating system and paternal behavior in Microtus ochragaster and M. pennsylvanicus. J. Mamm. 66, 165–167 (1985)

  2. 2.

    , , , & A critical role for nucleus accumbens dopamine in partner-preference formation in male prairie voles. J. Neurosci. 23, 3483–3490 (2003)

  3. 3.

    , , , & Dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens are important for social attachment in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behav. Neurosci. 114, 173–183 (2000)

  4. 4.

    & Vasopressin-dependent neural circuits underlying pair bonding in the monogamous prairie vole. Neuroscience 125, 35–45 (2004)

  5. 5.

    , & Patterns of brain vasopressin receptor distribution associated with social organization in microtine rodents. J. Neurosci. 14, 5381–5392 (1994)

  6. 6.

    Monogamy in mammals. Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 39–69 (1977)

  7. 7.

    , , , & A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles. Nature 365, 545–548 (1993)

  8. 8.

    , & Role of septal vasopressin innervation in paternal behavior in prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 400–404 (1994)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Increased affiliative response to vasopressin in mice expressing the V1a receptor from a monogamous vole. Nature 400, 766–768 (1999)

  10. 10.

    , & Ventral striatopallidal oxytocin and vasopressin V1a receptors in the monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). J. Comp. Neurol. 468, 555–570 (2004)

  11. 11.

    , & Localization of vasopressin (V1a) receptor binding and mRNA in the rhesus monkey brain. J. Neuroendocrinol. 11, 291–297 (1999)

  12. 12.

    Beach Award. Oxytocin and vasopressin receptors and species-typical social behaviors. Horm. Behav. 36, 212–221 (1999)

  13. 13.

    et al. Vasopressin in the forebrain of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): studies with in situ hybridization, immunocytochemistry and receptor autoradiography. Brain Res. 768, 147–156 (1997)

  14. 14.

    , & Species differences in paternal behavior and aggression in peromyscus and their associations with vasopressin immunoreactivity and receptors. Horm. Behav. 36, 25–38 (1999)

  15. 15.

    & Development of selective partner preferences in captive male and female meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus. Anim. Behav. 61, 1217–1226 (2001)

  16. 16.

    et al. Dopamine D2 receptor-mediated regulation of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): a mechanism for pair bonding? Behav. Neurosci. 113, 602–611 (1999)

  17. 17.

    , , & Cooperative breeding and monogamy in prairie voles: influence of the sire and geographical variation. Anim. Behav. 55, 1131–1140 (1998)

  18. 18.

    , , , & Profound impairment in social recognition and reduction in anxiety-like behavior in vasopressin V1a receptor knockout mice. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 483–493 (2004)

  19. 19.

    et al. Viral vector-mediated gene transfer of the vole V1a vasopressin receptor in the rat septum: improved social discrimination and active social behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 403–411 (2003)

  20. 20.

    et al. Opposite modulation of social attachment by D1- and D2-type dopamine receptor activation in nucleus accumbens shell. Horm. Behav. 44, 37 (2003)

  21. 21.

    & Social behavior and comparative genomics: new genes or new gene regulation? Genes Brain Behav. 1, 197–203 (2002)

  22. 22.

    & Functional microsatellite polymorphism associated with divergent social structure in vole species. Mol. Biol. Evol. (in the press)

  23. 23.

    & Extraordinary diversity in vasopressin (V1a) receptor distributions among wild prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): patterns of variation and covariation. J. Comp. Neurol. 466, 564–576 (2003)

  24. 24.

    & Variation in the vasopressin V1a receptor promoter and expression: implications for inter- and intraspecific variation in social behaviour. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16, 399–402 (2002)

  25. 25.

    & Vasopressin and oxytocin receptors in the central nervous system. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 10, 119–154 (1996)

  26. 26.

    et al. Transmission disequilibrium testing of arginine vasopressin receptor 1A (AVPR1A) polymorphisms in autism. Mol. Psychiatry 7, 503–507 (2002)

  27. 27.

    et al. Facilitation of affiliation and pair-bond formation by vasopressin receptor gene transfer into the ventral forebrain of a monogamous vole. J. Neurosci. 21, 7392–7396 (2001)

  28. 28.

    , , & Species differences in V1a receptor gene expression in monogamous and nonmonogamous voles: behavioral consequences. Behav. Neurosci. 111, 599–605 (1997)

Download references


We thank C. A. Sharer for contributing to the initial viral vector work, L. Miller for assistance with meadow vole breeding, and A. Z. Murphy and E. A. D. Hammock for their critical readings of the manuscript. Funding for this work was provided by grants from the NIH to M.M.L., Z.X.W., L.J.Y. and the Yerkes Center, and by a NSF STC grant to the Center for Behavioral Neuroscience.Authors' contributions M.M.L. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. Z.X.W. provided the animals and behavioural testing equipment for the pilot studies, the D2 autoradiography protocol and scientific input. D.E.O. assisted with the paternal behaviour testing. X.H.R. and E.F.T. generated the viral vectors. L.J.Y. conceived the idea and co-wrote the manuscript.

Author information


  1. Center for Behavioral Neuroscience and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA

    • Miranda M. Lim
    • , Daniel E. Olazábal
    •  & Larry J. Young
  2. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA

    • Zuoxin Wang
  3. Harvard Institutes of Medicine and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Xianghui Ren
    •  & Ernest F. Terwilliger


  1. Search for Miranda M. Lim in:

  2. Search for Zuoxin Wang in:

  3. Search for Daniel E. Olazábal in:

  4. Search for Xianghui Ren in:

  5. Search for Ernest F. Terwilliger in:

  6. Search for Larry J. Young in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry J. Young.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.