Dependence of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude


An important constraint on the processes governing the geodynamo—the flow in the outer core responsible for generating Earth's magnetic field—is the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals; that is, how long it takes for Earth's magnetic field to reverse1. It is generally accepted that Earth's magnetic field strength drops to low levels during polarity reversals, and the field direction progresses through a 180° change while the field is weak1. The time it takes for this process to happen, however, remains uncertain, with estimates ranging from a few thousand up to 28,000 years. Here I present an analysis of the available sediment records of the four most recent polarity reversals. These records yield an average estimate of about 7,000 years for the time it takes for the directional change to occur. The variation about this mean duration is not random, but instead varies with site latitude, with shorter durations observed at low-latitude sites, and longer durations observed at mid- to high-latitude sites. Such variation of duration with site latitude is predicted by simple geometrical reversal models, in which non-dipole fields are allowed to persist while the axial dipole decays through zero and then builds in the opposite direction, and provides a constraint on numerical dynamo models.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Comparison of the transition-zone thickness in the lower Jaramillo record from ODP Hole 758A (ref.
Figure 2: The duration of the directional changes during polarity transitions varies as a function of site latitude.
Figure 3: The durations do not correlate with sedimentation rates.
Figure 4: Simple geometrical models in which standing non-dipole fields are allowed to persist while the axial dipole field decays to zero and then builds up in the opposite direction produce transition durations that vary systematically with latitude.


  1. 1

    Merrill, R. T. & McFadden, P. L. Geomagnetic polarity transitions. Rev. Geophys. 37, 201–226 (1999)

  2. 2

    Singer, B. S. & Pringle, M. S. Age and duration of the Matuyama-Brunhes geomagnetic polarity reversal from 40Ar/39Ar incremental heating analyses of lavas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 139, 47–61 (1996)

  3. 3

    McElhinny, M. W. & Lock, J. IAGA paleomagnetic databases with access. Surv. Geophys. 17, 575–591 (1996)

  4. 4

    Channell, J. E. T. & Lehman, B. The last two geomagnetic polarity reversals recorded in high-deposition-rate sediment drifts. Nature 389, 712–715 (1997)

  5. 5

    Yamazaki, T. & Oda, H. Orbital influence on Earth's magnetic field; 100,000-year periodicity in inclination. Science 295, 2435–2438 (2002)

  6. 6

    Oda, H., Shibuya, H. & Hsu, V. Palaeomagnetic records of the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity transition from ODP Leg 124 (Celebes and Sulu seas). Geophys. J. Int. 142, 319–338 (2000)

  7. 7

    Fisher, R. A. Dispersion on a sphere. Proc. R. Astron. Soc. A 217, 295–305 (1953)

  8. 8

    Channell, J. E. T., Hodell, D. A. & Lehman, B. Relative geomagnetic paleointensity and δ18O at ODP Site 983 (Gardar Drift, North Atlantic) since 350 ka. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 153, 103–118 (1997)

  9. 9

    Cande, S. C. & Kent, D. V. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic polarity time scale for the Late Cretacous and Cenozoic. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 6093–6095 (1995)

  10. 10

    Holt, J. W. & Kirschvink, J. L. The upper Olduvai geomagnetic field reversal from Death Valley, California; a fold test of transitional directions. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 133, 475–491 (1995)

  11. 11

    Clement, B. M. & Kent, D. V. Latitudinal dependency of geomagnetic polarity transition durations. Nature 310, 488–491 (1984)

  12. 12

    Dormy, E., Valet, J.-P. & Courtillot, V. Numerical models of the geodynamo and observational constraints. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 1, doi:2000GC000062 (2000)

  13. 13

    McMillan, D. G., Constable, C. G., Parker, R. L. & Glatzmaier, G. A. A statistical analysis of magnetic fields from some geodynamo simulations. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst.[online] 28, doi:2000GC000130 (2001)

  14. 14

    Coe, R. S., Hongre, L. & Glatzmaier, G. A. An examination of simulated geomagnetic reversals from a palaeomagnetic perspective. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 358, 1141–1170 (2000)

  15. 15

    Clement, B. M. & Kent, D. V. A southern hemisphere record of the Matuyama-Brunhes polarity reversal. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 81–84 (1991)

  16. 16

    Theyer, F., Herrero-Bervera, E., Hsu, V. & Hammond, S. R. The zonal harmonic model of polarity transitions; a test using successive reversals. J. Geophys. Res. B 90, 1963–1982 (1985)

  17. 17

    Valet, J.-P., Tauxe, L. & Clement, B. Equatorial and mid-latitude records of the last geomagnetic reversal from the Atlantic Ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 94, 371–384 (1989)

  18. 18

    Clement, B. M., Kent, D. V. & Opdyke, N. D. Brunhes-Matuyama polarity transition in three deep-sea sediment cores. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 306, 113–119 (1982)

  19. 19

    Cisowski, S. M. et al. Detailed record of the Brunhes/Matuyama polarity reversal in high sedimentation rate marine sediments from the Isu-Bonin Arc. Proc. ODP Sci. Res. 126, 341–352 (1992)

  20. 20

    Zhu, R., Laj, C. & Mazuad, A. The Matuyama-Brunhes and upper Jaramillo transitions recorded in a loess section at Weinan, north-central China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 125, 143–158 (1994)

  21. 21

    Okada, M. & Niitsuma, N. Detailed paleomagnetic records during the Brunhes-Matuyama geomagnetic reversal, and a direct determination of depth lag for magnetization in marine sediments. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 56, 133–150 (1989)

  22. 22

    Valet, J.-P., Tauxe, L. & Clark, C. R. The Brunhes-Matuyama transition recorded from Lake Tecopa sediments (California). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 87, 463–472 (1988)

  23. 23

    Clement, B. M., Kent, D. V. Geomagnetic polarity transition records from five hydraulic piston core sites in the North Atlantic. in Init. Rep. Deep Sea Drilling Project (ed. Ruddiman, W. F. et al.) 94, 831–852 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, 1987)

  24. 24

    Athanossopolous, J. A Matuyama-Brunhes Polarity Reversal Record; Comparison Between Thermal and Alternating Field Demagnetization of Ocean Sediments from the North Pacific Transect. PhD thesis, Univ. California, Santa Barbara, 225 (1993)

  25. 25

    Herrero-Bervera, E. & Theyer, F. Non-axisymmetric behaviour of Olduvai and Jaramillo polarity transitions recorded in north-central Pacific deep-sea sediments. Nature 322, 159–162 (1986)

  26. 26

    Clement, B. M. & Kent, D. V. A detailed record of the lower Jaramillo polarity transition from a southern hemisphere, deep-sea sediment core. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 1049–1058 (1984)

  27. 27

    Gee, J. S. et al. Lower Jaramillo polarity transition records from the equatorial Atlantic and Indian oceans. Proc. ODP Sci. Res. 121, 377–391 (1991)

  28. 28

    Clement, B. M. & Kent, D. V. A comparison of two sequential geomagnetic polarity transitions (upper Olduvai and lower Jaramillo) from the Southern Hemisphere. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 39, 301–313 (1985)

  29. 29

    Herrero-Bervera, E. & Khan, M. A. Olduvai termination; detailed palaeomagnetic analysis of a north central Pacific core. Geophys. J. Int. 108, 535–545 (1992)

Download references


R. Coe, D. V. Kent, J. Dauphin & B. Midson provided comments that improved the manuscript. J. E. T. Channell and T. Yamazaki provided their data for this work.

Author information

Correspondence to Bradford M. Clement.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.