Abstract
Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment1,2. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects3,4,5,6,7. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes8,9,10,11,12, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Object-based visual working memory: an object benefit for equidistant memory items presented within simple contours
Psychological Research Open Access 29 October 2022
-
Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion
Scientific Reports Open Access 22 October 2022
-
The influence of self-reported history of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance
Scientific Reports Open Access 11 October 2022
Access options
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
$199.00
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
$32.00
All prices are NET prices.



References
Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997)
Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 74, Whole No. 498 (1960)
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 92–114 (2001)
Jevons, W. S. The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3, 281–282 (1871)
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J. & Tuholski, S. W. in Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (eds Miyake, A. & Shah, P.) 102–134 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1999)
Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956)
Cowan, N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 87–185 (2001)
Jonides, J. et al. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature 363, 623–625 (1993)
Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K. & Haxby, J. V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997)
Cohen, J. D. et al. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386, 604–608 (1997)
Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 16, 5154–5167 (1996)
Fuster, J. M. & Jervey, J. P. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361–375 (1982)
Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Grafman, J., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia 35, 195–209 (1997)
Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76, 419–439 (1990)
Gratton, G. The contralateral organization of visual processing: A theoretical concept and a research tool. Psychophysiology 35, 638–647 (1998)
Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400, 867–869 (1999)
Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J. Neurosci. 13, 1460–1478 (1993)
Baddeley, A. Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 49, 5–28 (1996)
Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998)
Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6558–6563 (1999)
Ruchkin, D., Canoune, H., Johnson, R. & Ritter, W. Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 32, 399–410 (1995)
Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. A subsequent-memory effect in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 16, 162–166 (2003)
Rypma, B., Prabhakaran, V., Desmond, J., Glover, G. H. & Gabrieli, J. D. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage 9, 216–226 (1999)
Eriksen, C. W. & St James, J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 225–240 (1986)
Pashler, H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 369–378 (1988)
Logie, R. H. Visuo-Spatial Working Memory (Erlbaum, Hove, UK, 1995)
Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 47–70 (2003)
Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 422–433 (1996)
Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity. Intelligence 14, 398–433 (1990)
Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J. & Shapiro, K. L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1656–1674 (1998)
Acknowledgements
The research reported here was supported by a grant from the US National Institute of Mental Health.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vogel, E., Machizawa, M. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428, 748–751 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447
This article is cited by
-
The influence of self-reported history of mild traumatic brain injury on cognitive performance
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Recruitment of a long-term memory supporting neural network during repeated maintenance of a multi-item abstract visual image in working memory
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Evidence for the contribution of HCN1 gene polymorphism (rs1501357) to working memory at both behavioral and neural levels in schizophrenia patients and healthy controls
Schizophrenia (2022)
-
Neural interactions in working memory explain decreased recall precision and similarity-based feature repulsion
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Multiple spatial frames for immersive working memory
Nature Human Behaviour (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.