Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity


Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment1,2. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects3,4,5,6,7. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes8,9,10,11,12, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Stimuli and results from experiment one.
Figure 2: ERP difference waves at lateral occipital and posterior parietal electrode sites for experiments two, three and four, respectively.
Figure 3: Mean amplitude and visual memory capacity.


  1. Luck, S. J. & Vogel, E. K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sperling, G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 74, Whole No. 498 (1960)

  3. Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 92–114 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jevons, W. S. The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3, 281–282 (1871)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J. & Tuholski, S. W. in Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (eds Miyake, A. & Shah, P.) 102–134 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller, G. A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan, N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 87–185 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jonides, J. et al. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature 363, 623–625 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Courtney, S. M., Ungerleider, L. G., Keil, K. & Haxby, J. V. Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen, J. D. et al. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386, 604–608 (1997)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, E. K., Erickson, C. A. & Desimone, R. Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 16, 5154–5167 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fuster, J. M. & Jervey, J. P. Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361–375 (1982)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Grafman, J., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia 35, 195–209 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruchkin, D., Johnson, R., Canoune, H. & Ritter, W. Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76, 419–439 (1990)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gratton, G. The contralateral organization of visual processing: A theoretical concept and a research tool. Psychophysiology 35, 638–647 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400, 867–869 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Miller, E. K., Li, L. & Desimone, R. Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J. Neurosci. 13, 1460–1478 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baddeley, A. Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 49, 5–28 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hillyard, S. A., Vogel, E. K. & Luck, S. J. Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6558–6563 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruchkin, D., Canoune, H., Johnson, R. & Ritter, W. Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 32, 399–410 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rypma, B. & D'Esposito, M. D. A subsequent-memory effect in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 16, 162–166 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rypma, B., Prabhakaran, V., Desmond, J., Glover, G. H. & Gabrieli, J. D. Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage 9, 216–226 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eriksen, C. W. & St James, J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 225–240 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pashler, H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 369–378 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Logie, R. H. Visuo-Spatial Working Memory (Erlbaum, Hove, UK, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kane, M. J. & Engle, R. W. Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 47–70 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Daneman, M. & Merikle, P. M. Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 422–433 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity. Intelligence 14, 398–433 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J. & Shapiro, K. L. Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1656–1674 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The research reported here was supported by a grant from the US National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward K. Vogel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vogel, E., Machizawa, M. Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature 428, 748–751 (2004).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing