Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity

Abstract

The Fifth World Parks Congress in Durban, South Africa, announced in September 2003 that the global network of protected areas now covers 11.5% of the planet's land surface1. This surpasses the 10% target proposed a decade earlier, at the Caracas Congress2, for 9 out of 14 major terrestrial biomes1. Such uniform targets based on percentage of area have become deeply embedded into national and international conservation planning3. Although politically expedient, the scientific basis and conservation value of these targets have been questioned4,5. In practice, however, little is known of how to set appropriate targets, or of the extent to which the current global protected area network fulfils its goal of protecting biodiversity. Here, we combine five global data sets on the distribution of species and protected areas to provide the first global gap analysis assessing the effectiveness of protected areas in representing species diversity. We show that the global network is far from complete, and demonstrate the inadequacy of uniform—that is, ‘one size fits all’—conservation targets.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2: Percentage of gap species in relation to endemism levels and percentage of area protected across biomes and countries.

References

  1. 1

    Chape, S., Fish, L., Fox, P. & Spalding, M. United Nations List of Protected Areas (IUCN/UNEP, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    The World Conservation Union. Parks For Life: Report of the IVth World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Kamden-Toham, A. et al. Forest conservation in the Congo Basin. Science 299, 346 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Soulé, M. E. & Sanjayan, M. A. Conservation targets: do they help? Science 279, 2060–2061 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Pressey, R. L., Cowling, R. M. & Rouget, M. Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 112, 99–127 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Scott, J. M. et al. Gap analysis—a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildl. Monogr. 123, 1–41 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Lacher, T. E. Jr in GIS Methodologies for Developing Conservation Strategies (eds Savitsky, B. G. & Lacher, T. E. Jr) 199–209 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Jennings, M. D. Gap analysis: Concepts, methods, and recent results. Landscape Ecol. 15, 5–20 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Scott, J. M. et al. Nature reserves: Do they capture the full range of America's biological diversity? Ecol. Appl. 11, 999–1007 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Andelman, S. J. & Willig, M. R. Present patterns and future prospects for biodiversity in the Western Hemisphere. Ecol. Lett. 6, 818–824 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Pressey, R. L. Ad hoc reservations—Forward or backward steps in developing representative reserve systems? Conserv. Biol. 8, 662–668 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Newmark, W. D. Insularization of Tanzanian parks and the local extinction of large mammals. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1549–1556 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Peres, C. A. & Lake, I. R. Extent of nontimber resource extraction in tropical forests: accessibility to game vertebrates by hunters in the Amazon basin. Conserv. Biol. 17, 521–535 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    The World Conservation Union, Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories (IUCN CNPPA/WCMC, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. & Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World—Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    BirdLife International. Threatened Birds of the World (Lynx Edicions/BirdLife International, Barcelona/Cambridge, UK, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    The World Conservation Union. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species [online] 〈http://www.redlist.org〉 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bruner, A. G., Gullison, R. E., Rice, R. E. & Fonseca, G. A. B. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291, 125–128 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Green, M. J. B. & Paine, J. State of the World's Protected Areas at the End of the Twentieth Century (WCMC, Cambridge, UK, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Gaston, K. J. How large do reserve networks need to be? Ecol. Lett. 4, 602–609 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Gaston, K. J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405, 220–227 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Cowling, R. M. & Pressey, R. L. Rapid plant diversification: planning for an evolutionary future. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5452–5457 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Gaston, K. J. & May, R. M. Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature 356, 281–282 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Balmford, A. et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297, 950–953 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    World Database on Protected Areas. World Database on Protected Areas (IUCN-WCPA/UNEP-WCMC, Washington DC, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Iverson, J. B., Kiester, A. R., Hughes, L. E. & Kimerling, A. J. The EMYSystem World Turtle Database 2003 [online] 〈http://emys.geo.orst.edu〉 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Moore Family Foundation, the Howard Gilman Foundation and the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis of the University of California Santa Barbara for support. The analysis was possible thanks to the combined effort of the thousands of individuals and hundreds of institutions who collected and compiled the data, or provided financial support for such efforts. We are grateful to the numerous individuals who contributed to this analysis, especially to K. Buhlmann, S. Butchart, N. Cox, P. P. van Dijk, J. Iverson, R. Kiester, T. Lacher and B. Young. H. Possingham made valuable comments on the manuscript. Figure 1 was generated by J. Seeber.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana S. L. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Notes on: data sources and limitations; background information regarding targets based on percentage of area protected; confidence intervals for species coverage in networks of randomly distributed protected areas; comparison between protected and unprotected sites in terms of richness of all species, threatened species, and restricted-range species; and extended acknowledgements. (PDF 339 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrigues, A., Andelman, S., Bakarr, M. et al. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428, 640–643 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing