Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure

Abstract

Food webs are descriptions of who eats whom in an ecosystem. Although extremely complex and variable, their structure possesses basic regularities1,2,3,4,5,6. A fascinating question is to find a simple model capturing the underlying processes behind these repeatable patterns. Until now, two models have been devised for the description of trophic interactions within a natural community7,8. Both are essentially based on the concept of ecological niche, with the consumers organized along a single niche dimension; for example, prey size8,9. Unfortunately, they fail to describe adequately recent and high-quality data. Here, we propose a new model built on the hypothesis that any species' diet is the consequence of phylogenetic constraints and adaptation. Simple rules incorporating both concepts yield food webs whose structure is very close to real data. Consumers are organized in groups forming a nested hierarchy, which better reflects the complexity and multidimensionality of most natural systems.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Comparison of one simulation of the niche model (a) and of the nested hierarchy model (c), with respect to a real food web (b); Bridge Brook Lake4.
Figure 2: Hypothetical food webs illustrating chordless cycles and intervality, and irreducible gaps.
Figure 3

References

  1. 1

    Cohen, J. E. Food Webs and Niche Space (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Sugihara, G. Niche Hierarchy: Structure Assembly and Organization in Natural Communities. PhD Thesis, Princeton Univ., Princeton (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Cohen, J. E., Briand, F. & Newman, C. N. Community Food Webs: Data and Theory (Springer, Berlin, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Havens, K. E. Scale and Structure in Natural Food Webs. Science 257, 1107–1109 (1992)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bersier, L. F. & Sugihara, G. Scaling regions for food web properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1247–1251 (1997)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Solow, A. R. & Beet, A. R. On lumping species in food webs. Ecology 79, 2013–2018 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Cohen, J. E. & Newman, C. M. A stochastic theory of community food webs I. Models and aggregated data. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 224, 449–461 (1985)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Simple rules yield complex food webs. Nature 404, 180–183 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Lawton, J. H. & Warren, P. H. Static and dynamic explanations for patterns in food webs. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 242–245 (1988)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    DeAngelis, D. L. Stability and connectance in food web models. Ecology 56, 238–243 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kondoh, M. Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food-web complexity and stability. Science 299, 1388–1391 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Gardner, M. & Ashby, W. Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature 228, 784 (1970)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    May, R. M. Stability and Complexity of Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Pimm, S. L. Food Webs (Chapman and Hall, London, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Cousins, S. H. The trophic continuum in marine ecosystems: Structure and equations for a predictive model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 213, 76–93 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. Numerical Ecology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Diamond, J. M. in Ecology and Evolution of Communities (eds Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M.) 342–444 (Belknap/Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Price, P. W. Macroevolutionary Theory on Macroecological Patterns (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Martinez, N. D. Constant connectance in community food webs. Am. Nat. 139, 1208–1218 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Cohen, J. E., Jonsson, T. & Carpenter, S. R. Ecological community description using the food web, species abundance, and body size. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1781–1786 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Sugihara, G. in Population Biology. Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics (ed. Levin, S. A.) 83–101 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Sugihara, G., Bersier, L. F., Southwood, T. R. E., Pimm, S. L. & May, R. M. Predicted correspondence between species abundances and dendrograms of niche similarities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5246–5251 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Warren, P. H. Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of a freshwater food web. Oikos 55, 299–311 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Baird, D. & Ulanowicz, R. E. The seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake bay ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 59, 329–364 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Hall, S. J. & Raffaelli, D. Food-web patterns: lessons from a species-rich web. J. Anim. Ecol. 60, 823–842 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Polis, G. A. Complex trophic interactions in deserts: an empirical critique of food-web theory. Am. Nat. 138, 123–155 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Goldwasser, L. & Roughgarden, J. Construction and analysis of a large Caribbean food web. Ecology 74, 1216–1233 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Martinez, N. D. Artifacts or attributes? Effects of resolution on the Little Rock Lake food web. Ecol. Monogr. 61, 367–392 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Jaccard, P. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaudoise Sci. Nat. 44, 223–270 (1908)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Bascompte, S. Cousins, S. Hubbell, R. Naisbit and P. Warren for useful comments. This work was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Novartis Foundation, and partly by the National Center of Competence in Research ‘Plant Survival’.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis-Félix Bersier.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cattin, M., Bersier, L., Banašek-Richter, C. et al. Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure. Nature 427, 835–839 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02327

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.