Letter | Published:

Multistability in the lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli

Abstract

Multistability, the capacity to achieve multiple internal states in response to a single set of external inputs, is the defining characteristic of a switch. Biological switches are essential for the determination of cell fate in multicellular organisms1, the regulation of cell-cycle oscillations during mitosis2,3 and the maintenance of epigenetic traits in microbes4. The multistability of several natural1,2,3,4,5,6 and synthetic7,8,9 systems has been attributed to positive feedback loops in their regulatory networks10. However, feedback alone does not guarantee multistability. The phase diagram of a multistable system, a concise description of internal states as key parameters are varied, reveals the conditions required to produce a functional switch11,12. Here we present the phase diagram of the bistable lactose utilization network of Escherichia coli13. We use this phase diagram, coupled with a mathematical model of the network, to quantitatively investigate processes such as sugar uptake and transcriptional regulation in vivo. We then show how the hysteretic response of the wild-type system can be converted to an ultrasensitive graded response14,15. The phase diagram thus serves as a sensitive probe of molecular interactions and as a powerful tool for rational network design.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Ferrell, J. E. Jr & Machleder, E. M. The biochemical basis of an all-or-none cell fate switch in Xenopus oocytes. Science 280, 895–898 (1998)

  2. 2

    Pomerening, J. R., Sontag, E. D. & Ferrell, J. E. Jr Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 346–351 (2003)

  3. 3

    Sha, W. et al. Hysteresis drives cell-cycle transitions in Xenopus laevis egg extracts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 975–980 (2003)

  4. 4

    Hernday, A., Braaten, B. A. & Low, D. The mechanism by which DNA adenine methylase and PapI activate the pap epigenetic switch. Mol. Cell 12, 947–957 (2003)

  5. 5

    Blauwkamp, T. A. & Ninfa, A. J. Physiological role of the GlnK signal transduction protein of Escherichia coli: survival of nitrogen starvation. Mol. Microbiol. 46, 203–214 (2002)

  6. 6

    Siegele, D. A. & Hu, J. C. Gene expression from plasmids containing the araBAD promoter at subsaturating inducer concentrations represents mixed populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8168–8172 (1997)

  7. 7

    Gardner, T. S., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403, 339–342 (2000)

  8. 8

    Isaacs, F. J., Hasty, J., Cantor, C. R. & Collins, J. J. Prediction and measurement of an augoregulatory genetic module. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7714–7719 (2003)

  9. 9

    Becskei, A., Seraphin, B. & Serrano, L. Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO J. 20, 2528–2535 (2001)

  10. 10

    Ferrell, J. E. Jr Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 140–148 (2002)

  11. 11

    Ma, S.-K. Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts, 1976)

  12. 12

    Strogatz, S. H. Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Perseus Books, Reading, Massachusetts, 1994)

  13. 13

    Müller-Hill, B. The Lac Operon: A Short History of a Genetic Paradigm (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996)

  14. 14

    Louis, M. & Becskei, A. Binary and graded responses in gene networks. Science STKE [online], 30 July 2002 (doi:10.1126/stke.2002.143.pe33)

  15. 15

    Biggar, S. R. & Crabtree, G. R. Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses. EMBO J. 20, 3167–3176 (2001)

  16. 16

    Novick, A. & Weiner, M. Enzyme induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 43, 553–566 (1957)

  17. 17

    Cohn, M. & Horibata, K. Inhibition by glucose of the induced synthesis of the β-galactoside-enzyme system of Escherichia coli: Analysis of maintenance. J. Bacteriol. 78, 601–612 (1959)

  18. 18

    Stulke, J. & Hillen, W. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2, 195–201 (1999)

  19. 19

    Setty, Y., Mayo, A. E., Surette, M. G. & Alon, U. Detailed map of a cis-regulatory input function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7702–7707 (2003)

  20. 20

    Griffith, J. S. Mathematics of cellular control processes II: Positive feedback to one gene. J. Theor. Biol. 20, 209–216 (1968)

  21. 21

    Tyson, J. J. & Othmer, H. G. The dynamics of feedback control circuits in biochemical pathways. Prog. Theor. Biol. 5, 1–62 (1978)

  22. 22

    Nobelmann, B. & Lengeler, J. W. Molecular analysis of the gat genes from Escherichia coli and of their roles in galactitiol transport and metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 178, 6790–6795 (1996)

  23. 23

    Oehler, S., Eismann, E. R., Kramer, H. & Müller-Hill, B. The three operators of the lac operon cooperate in repression. EMBO J. 9, 973–979 (1990)

  24. 24

    Chung, J. D. & Stephanopoulos, G. On physiological multiplicity and population heterogeneity of biological systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 1509–1521 (1996)

  25. 25

    Kepler, T. B. & Elston, T. C. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. Biophys. J. 81, 3116–3136 (2001)

  26. 26

    Thattai, M. & Shraiman, B. I. Metabolic switching in the sugar phosphotransferase system of Escherichia coli. Biophys. J. 85, 744–754 (2003)

  27. 27

    Atkinson, M. R., Savageau, M. A., Myers, J. T. & Ninfa, A. J. Development of genetic toggle circuitry exhibiting toggle switch or oscillatory behavior in Escherichia coli. Cell 113, 597–607 (2003)

  28. 28

    Smolen, P., Baxter, D. A. & Byrne, J. H. Frequency selectivity, multistability, and oscillations emerge from models of genetic regulatory systems. Am. J. Physiol. 43, C531 (1998)

  29. 29

    Boyd, D., Weiss, D. S., Chen, J. C. & Beckwith, J. Towards single-copy gene expression systems making gene cloning physiologically relevant: lambda InCh, a simple Escherichia coli plasmid-chromosome shuttle system. J. Bacteriol. 182, 842–847 (2000)

  30. 30

    Lutz, R. & Bujard, H. Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 1203–1210 (1997)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank G. Jacobson and H. Kornberg, J. Paulsson, M. Savageau and A. Sengupta for discussions and suggestions; H. Bujard and R. Lutz for supplying the pZ vector system; and D. Boyd for help with the λ-InCh technique. We thank D. Raut for his assistance with the initial lactose measurements and the construction of plasmids and strains. We also thank A. Becskei and J. Pedraza for critically reviewing the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH and DARPA grants, and an NSF-CAREER grant.

Author information

Correspondence to Alexander van Oudenaarden.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Mathematical background and other supplementary information. (PDF 309 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: The lactose utilization network.
Figure 2: Hysteresis and bistability in single cells.
Figure 3: Single-cell in vivo measurement of network parameters.
Figure 4: Hysteretic and graded responses.

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.