The visual perception of object shape depends on ‘holistic’1,2,3,4 processing in which a given dimension cannot be perceptually isolated from the other dimensions of the object. The visual control of action (such as grasping an object), however, which is mediated by cortical areas that are largely independent of those mediating conscious perception5,6,7,8, must take into account only the most action-relevant dimension of an object without being misled by other non-relevant object features. Here we report the results of two experiments showing that vision for perception and vision for action deal with objects in a fundamentally different manner. We tested participants' ability to make perceptual judgements of the width of different rectangular objects or to grasp them across their width, while in both cases ignoring length9,10. Participants could not ignore length when making perceptual judgements of width but they could completely ignore length when grasping the same objects. These results suggest that in situations in which the elementary dimensions of an object's shape are perceived in a holistic manner, the same dimensions are treated analytically when a visually guided action is directed at that same object.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 26 November 2021
Virtual Reality Open Access 03 September 2021
Scientific Reports Open Access 13 March 2020
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Hochstein, S. & Ahissar, M. View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791–804 (2002)
Natsoulas, T. What are the objects of perceptual consciousness? Am. J. Psychol. 96, 435–467 (1983)
Pomerantz, J. R. & Pristach, E. A. Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 15, 635–649 (1989)
Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353–383 (1977)
Goodale, M. A. & Milner, A. D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20–25 (1992)
Goodale, M. A. et al. Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr. Biol. 4, 604–610 (1994)
James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S. & Goodale, M. A. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron 35, 793–801 (2002)
Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. & Servos, P. The role of surface information in object recognition: studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception 23, 1457–1481 (1994)
Garner, W. R. The Processing of Information and Structure (Potomac, Erlbaum, 1974)
Garner, W. R. Selective attention to attributes and to stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 107, 287–308 (1978)
Koffka, K. Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt Brace, New York, 1935)
Law, M. B. & Abrams, R. A. Object-based selection within and beyond the focus of spatial attention. Percept. Psychophys. 64, 1017–1027 (2003)
Duncan, J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 501–517 (1984)
O'Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E. & Kanwisher, N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584–587 (1999)
Goodale, M. A. & Servos, P. in Advances in Motor Learning and Control (ed. Zelaznik, H. N.) 87–121 (Human Kinetics, Illinois, 1996)
Swinnen, S. P., Dounskaia, N. & Duysens, J. Patterns of bimanual interference reveal movement encoding within a radial egocentric reference frame. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 463–471 (2001)
Goodale, M. A. & Humphrey, G. K. The objects of action and perception. Cognition 67, 181–207 (1998)
Marr, D. Visual information processing: the structure and creation of visual representations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 290, 199–218 (1980)
Edelman, S. & Duvdevani-Bar, S. A model of visual recognition and categorization. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352, 1191–1202 (1997)
Bar, M. Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 793–799 (2001)
Poggio, T. & Edelman, S. A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature 343, 263–266 (1990)
Ganel, T. & Goshen-Gottstein, Y. Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28, 854–867 (2002)
Shalev, L. & Algom, D. Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 997–1017 (2000)
Maddox, W. T. in Perceptual and Decisional Separability (ed. Ashby, F. G.) 147–180 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1992)
Felfoldy, G. L. Repetition effects in choice reaction time to multidimensional stimuli. Percept. Psychophys. 15, 453–459 (1974)
Dykes, J. R. & Cooper, R. G. An investigation of the perceptual basis of redundancy gain and orthogonal interference for integral dimensions. Percept. Psychophys. 23, 36–42 (1978)
Macmillan, N. A. & Ornstein, A. S. The mean-integral representation of rectangles. Percept. Psychophys. 60, 250–262 (1998)
Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S. & Keillor, J. M. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements. Neuropsychologia 32, 1159–1178 (1994)
Kwok, R. M. & Braddick, O. J. When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia 41, 932–940 (2003)
We thank J. Pomerantz, M. Morgan, S. Köhler and P. Gribble for comments on the manuscript, and G. Króliczak for his help. This research was supported by grants to M.A.G. from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canada Research Chairs Program.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Ganel, T., Goodale, M. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature 426, 664–667 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02156
This article is cited by
Virtual Reality (2022)
Scientific Reports (2021)
Scientific Reports (2020)
Psychological Research (2020)
Psychological Research (2020)