Letter | Published:

Governance and the loss of biodiversity


Most of the world's biodiversity occurs within developing countries that require donor support to build their conservation capacity1. Unfortunately, some of these countries experience high levels of political corruption2, which may limit the success of conservation projects by reducing effective funding levels and distorting priorities3. We investigated whether changes in three well surveyed and widespread components of biodiversity were associated with national governance scores and other socio-economic measures. Here we show that governance scores were correlated with changes in total forest cover, but not with changes in natural forest cover. We found strong associations between governance scores and changes in the numbers of African elephants and black rhinoceroses, and these socio-economic factors explained observed patterns better than any others. Finally, we show that countries rich in species and identified as containing priority areas for conservation have lower governance scores than other nations. These results stress the need for conservationists to develop and implement policies that reduce the effects of political corruption and, in this regard, we question the universal applicability of an influential approach to conservation that seeks to ban international trade in endangered species.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Balmford, A. et al. Ecology—Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297, 950–953 (2002)

  2. 2

    Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index 2002 (Transparency International, Berlin, 2002)

  3. 3

    Kaufmann, D. Corruption: The facts. Foreign Policy 107, 114–131 (1997)

  4. 4

    Azfar, O., Lee, Y. & Swamy, A. The causes and consequences of corruption. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 573, 42–56 (2001)

  5. 5

    Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997)

  6. 6

    Balmford, A., Gaston, K. J., Blyth, S., James, A. & Kapos, V. Global variation in terrestrial conservation costs, conservation benefits, and unmet conservation needs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1046–1050 (2003)

  7. 7

    James, A., Gaston, K. J. & Balmford, A. Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? Bioscience 51, 43–52 (2001)

  8. 8

    Hughey, K. F. D., Cullen, R. & Moran, E. Integrating economics into priority setting and evaluation in conservation management. Conserv. Biol. 17, 93–103 (2003)

  9. 9

    Balmford, A. & Whitten, T. Who should pay for tropical conservation, and how could the costs be met? Oryx 37, 238–250 (2003)

  10. 10

    Barnes, R. F. W., Blom, A. & Alers, M. P. T. A review of the status of forest elephants Loxodonta africana in Central Africa. Biol. Conserv. 71, 125–132 (1995)

  11. 11

    Archabald, K. & Naughton-Treves, L. Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: Early efforts to identify and reward local communities. Environ. Conserv. 28, 135–149 (2001)

  12. 12

    Myers, N. The Primary Source: Tropical Forests and our Future (Norton & Co, New York, 1992)

  13. 13

    Robertson, J. M. Y. & van Schaik, C. P. Causal factors underlying the dramatic decline of the Sumatran orang-utan. Oryx 35, 26–38 (2001)

  14. 14

    Salafsky, N., Margoluis, R., Redford, K. H. & Robinson, J. G. Improving the practice of conservation: A conceptual framework and research agenda for conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 16, 1469–1479 (2002)

  15. 15

    Didia, D. O. Democracy, political instability and tropical deforestation. Glob. Environ. Change 7, 63–76 (1997)

  16. 16

    Geist, H. J. & Lambin, E. F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52, 143–150 (2002)

  17. 17

    Jepson, P., Jarvie, J. K., MacKinnon, K. & Monk, K. A. The end for Indonesia's lowland forests? Science 292, 859 (2001)

  18. 18

    Leader-Williams, N. & Albon, S. D. Allocation of resources for conservation. Nature 336, 533–535 (1988)

  19. 19

    Barnes, R. F. W. et al. African Elephant Database 1998 (IUCN/SSC African Elephant Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1999)

  20. 20

    Emslie, R. & Brooks, M. African Rhino: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan (IUCN/SSC African Rhino Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 1999)

  21. 21

    Stattersfield, A. J., Crosby, M. J., Long, A. J. & Wege, D. C. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation (BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK, 1998)

  22. 22

    Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000)

  23. 23

    World Wide Fund For Nature Living Planet Campaign: A Call to Action (WWF, Washington DC, 1999)

  24. 24

    Whitten, T., Holmes, D. & MacKinnon, K. Conservation biology: A displacement behavior for academia? Conserv. Biol. 15, 1–3 (2001)

  25. 25

    Leakey, R. & Morell, V. Wildlife Wars: My Battle to Save Kenya's Elephants (Pan Macmillan, London, 2001)

  26. 26

    Walpole, M. J. & Leader-Williams, N. Masai Mara tourism reveals partnership benefits. Nature 413, 771 (2001)

  27. 27

    International Institute for Environment and Development Whose Eden? An Overview of Community Approaches to Wildlife Management (IIED, London, 1994)

  28. 28

    Oldfield, S. The Trade in Wildlife: Regulation for Conservation (Earthscan, London, 2002)

  29. 29

    James, A., Green, M. J. B. & Paine, J. R. (eds) A Global Review of Protected Area Budgets and Staff (WCMC-World Conservation Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)

  30. 30

    Rosenzweig, M. L. Species Diversity in Space and Time (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995)

Download references


We thank the Durrell Institute for Conservation and Ecology for providing funding, and K. Brandon, N. Burgess, S. Elton, R. Green, J. Groombridge, A. Huggins, S. Thornton and T. Whitten for advice.

Author information

Correspondence to R. J. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplemantary Tables (PDF 21 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1
Figure 2: Mean modelled governance scores and changes in national populations of two species, 1987–94.
Figure 3


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.