Abstract
The hypothesis that speech goals are defined acoustically and maintained by auditory feedback is a central idea in speech production research1,2,3,4,5,6. An alternative proposal is that speech production is organized in terms of control signals that subserve movements and associated vocal-tract configurations7,8,9. Indeed, the capacity for intelligible speech by deaf speakers suggests that somatosensory inputs related to movement play a role in speech production—but studies that might have documented a somatosensory component have been equivocal. For example, mechanical perturbations that have altered somatosensory feedback have simultaneously altered acoustics10,11,12,13,14. Hence, any adaptation observed under these conditions may have been a consequence of acoustic change. Here we show that somatosensory information on its own is fundamental to the achievement of speech movements. This demonstration involves a dissociation of somatosensory and auditory feedback during speech production. Over time, subjects correct for the effects of a complex mechanical load that alters jaw movements (and hence somatosensory feedback), but which has no measurable or perceptible effect on acoustic output. The findings indicate that the positions of speech articulators and associated somatosensory inputs constitute a goal of speech movements that is wholly separate from the sounds produced.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Brain activity during shadowing of audiovisual cocktail party speech, contributions of auditory–motor integration and selective attention
Scientific Reports Open Access 05 November 2022
-
Speaking with a KN95 face mask: a within-subjects study on speaker adaptation and strategies to improve intelligibility
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications Open Access 30 July 2022
-
The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm
Scientific Reports Open Access 09 August 2018
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout




References
Guenther, F. H., Hampson, M. & Johnson, D. A theoretical investigation of reference frames for the planning of speech movements. Psychol. Rev. 105, 611–633 (1998)
Guenther, F. H. et al. Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2854–2865 (1999)
Houde, J. F. & Jordan, M. I. Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production. Science 279, 1213–1216 (1998)
Jones, J. A. & Munhall, K. G. Perceptual calibration of F0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1246–1251 (2000)
Perkell, J. S., Matthies, M. L., Svirsky, M. A. & Jordan, M. I. Trading relations between tongue-body raising and lip rounding in production of the vowel /u/: A pilot “motor equivalence” study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2948–2961 (1993)
Perkell, J. S. & Nelson, W. L. Variability in production of the vowels /i/ and /a/. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 1889–1895 (1985)
Browman, C. P. & Goldstein, L. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155–180 (1992)
Guenther, F. H. Speech sound acquisition, coarticulation and rate effects in a neural network model of speech production. Psychol. Rev. 102, 594–621 (1995)
Saltzman, E. L. & Munhall, K. G. A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecol. Psychol. 1, 333–382 (1989)
Hamlet, S. L. & Stone, M. L. Compensatory vowel characteristics resulting from the presence of different types of experimental dental protheses. J. Phonet. 4, 199–218 (1976)
Lindblom, B., Lubker, J. & Gay, T. Formant frequencies of some fixed-mandible vowels and a model of speech motor programming by predictive simulation. J. Phonet. 7, 147–161 (1979)
McFarland, D., Baum, S. R. & Chabot, C. Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100, 1093–1104 (1996)
McFarland, D. & Baum, S. R. Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1865–1873 (1995)
Savariaux, C., Perrier, P. & Orliaguet, J. P. Compensation strategies for the perturbation of the rounded vowel [u] using a lip tube: A study of the control of space in speech production. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2428–2442 (1995)
Gandolfo, F., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. & Bizzi, I. Motor learning by field approximation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3843–3846 (1996)
Goodbody, S. J. & Wolpert, D. M. Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning. J. Neurophysiol. 79, 1825–1838 (1998)
Lackner, J. R. & Dizio, P. Rapid adaptation to coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J. Neurophysiol. 72, 299–313 (1994)
Shadmehr, R. & Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J. Neurosci. 14, 3208–3224 (1994)
Thoroughman, K. A. & Shadmehr, R. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. Nature 407, 742–747 (2000)
Bernstein, L. R. & Trahiotis, C. Detection of interaural delay in high-frequency noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 147–152 (1982)
Acknowledgements
We thank G. Houle, M. Tiede and C. Dolan for technical support. This work was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Le Fonds pour La Formation de Chercheurs et l'Aide à la Recherche, Quebec.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tremblay, S., Shiller, D. & Ostry, D. Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature 423, 866–869 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01710
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01710
This article is cited by
-
Chew on this! Oral stereognosis predicts visual word recognition in typical adults
Current Psychology (2023)
-
Speaking with a KN95 face mask: a within-subjects study on speaker adaptation and strategies to improve intelligibility
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications (2022)
-
Brain activity during shadowing of audiovisual cocktail party speech, contributions of auditory–motor integration and selective attention
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
The functional relations among motor-based prediction, sensory goals and feedback in learning non-native speech sounds: Evidence from adult Mandarin Chinese speakers with an auditory feedback masking paradigm
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
An exploratory investigation of the effects of whole-head vibration on jaw movements
Experimental Brain Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.