Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object

Abstract

One of the most important functions of vision is to direct actions to objects1. However, every time that vision is used to guide an action, retinal motion signals are produced by the movement of the eye and head as the person looks at the object or by the motion of other objects in the scene. To reach for the object accurately, the visuomotor system must separate information about the position of the stationary target from background retinal motion signals—a long-standing problem that is poorly understood2,3,4,5,6,7. Here we show that the visuomotor system does not distinguish between these two information sources: when observers made fast reaching movements to a briefly presented stationary target, their hand shifted in a direction consistent with the motion of a distant and unrelated stimulus, a result contrary to most other findings8,9. This can be seen early in the hand's trajectory (120 ms) and occurs continuously from programming of the movement through to its execution. The visuomotor system might make use of the motion signals arising from eye and head movements to update the positions of targets rapidly and redirect the hand to compensate for body movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Stimulus and results for the first experiment.
Figure 2: Average hand trajectories from experiment 1 for subject E.L.V., where the target flash occurred coincidently with the motion reversal.
Figure 3: Average hand trajectories from experiment 1 for subject ELV, where the target was presented 235 ms before the motion reversal.
Figure 4: Deviations in reaching movements as a function of target duration.

References

  1. Jeannerod, M. The Neural and Behavioural Organization of Goal-Directed Movements (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Res. 31, 1619–1626 (1991)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kowler, E. Eye Movements and their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nishida, S. & Johnston, A. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature 397, 610–612 (1999)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramachandran, V. S. & Anstis, S. M. Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges. Perception 19, 611–616 (1990)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smeets, J. B. J. & Brenner, E. Perception and action are based on the same visual information: distinction between position and velocity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21, 19–31 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitney, D. & Cavanagh, P. Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects. Nature Neurosci. 3, 954–959 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bridgeman, B., Lewis, S., Heit, G. & Nagle, M. Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 5, 692–700 (1979)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wong, E. & Mack, A. Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 48, 123–131 (1981)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Desmurget, M. & Grafton, S. Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 423–431 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodale, M. A., Pelisson, D. & Prablanc, C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 320, 748–750 (1986)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paulignan, Y., MacKenzie, C., Marteniuk, R. & Jeannerod, M. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp. Brain Res. 79, 431–435 (1990)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pelisson, D., Prablanc, C., Goodale, M. A. & Jeannerod, M. Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Exp. Brain Res. 62, 303–311 (1986)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Prablanc, C. & Martin, O. Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. J. Neurophysiol. 67, 455–469 (1992)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brenner, E. & Smeets, J. B. J. Fast responses of the human hand to changes in target position. J. Mot. Behav. 29, 297–310 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abrams, R. A. & Landgraf, J. Z. Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization. Percept. Psychophys. 47, 349–359 (1990)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bacon, J. H., Gordon, A. & Schulman, P. H. The effect of two types of induced-motion displays on perceived location of the induced target. Percept. Psychophys. 32, 353–359 (1982)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bridgeman, B., Peery, S. & Anand, S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Percept. Psychophys. 59, 456–469 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lepecq, J. C., Jouen, F. & Dubon, D. The effect of linear vection on manual aiming at memorized directions of stationary targets. Perception 22, 49–60 (1993)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Masson, G., Proteau, L. & Mestre, D. R. Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans. Vision Res. 35, 837–852 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheth, B. R. & Shimojo, S. In space, the past can be recast but not the present. Perception 29, 1279–1290 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamagishi, N., Anderson, S. J. & Ashida, H. Evidence for dissociation between the perceptual and visuomotor systems in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 973–977 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Andersen, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C. & Xing, J. Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 303–330 (1997)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buneo, C. A., Jarvis, M. R., Batista, A. P. & Andersen, R. A. Direct visuomotor transformations for reaching. Nature 416, 632–636 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Henriques, D. Y., Klier, E. M., Smith, M. A., Lowy, D. & Crawford, J. D. Gaze-centered remapping of remembered visual space in an open-loop pointing task. J. Neurosci. 18, 1583–1594 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Berry, M. J. 2nd, Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A. & Meister, M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398, 334–338 (1999)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hayes, A. Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 1341–1345 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Snowden, R. J. Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion. Curr. Biol. 8, 1343–1345 (1998)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Whitaker, D., McGraw, P. V. & Pearson, S. Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects. Vision Res. 39, 2999–3009 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Blouin, J., Gauthier, G. M., van Donkelaar, P. & Vercher, J. L. Encoding the position of a flashed visual target after passive body rotations. NeuroReport 6, 1165–1168 (1995)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Ladich, D. Pulham, C. Thomas, L. Van Cleeff, E. Veinsreideris and H. Yang. This work was supported by grants from US National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute to D.W., and from Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Canada Research Chairs Program to M.A.G.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Whitney.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitney, D., Westwood, D. & Goodale, M. The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object. Nature 423, 869–873 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01693

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01693

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing