Letter | Published:

Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities

Naturevolume 423pages280283 (2003) | Download Citation



Serious concerns have been raised about the ecological effects of industrialized fishing1,2,3, spurring a United Nations resolution on restoring fisheries and marine ecosystems to healthy levels4. However, a prerequisite for restoration is a general understanding of the composition and abundance of unexploited fish communities, relative to contemporary ones. We constructed trajectories of community biomass and composition of large predatory fishes in four continental shelf and nine oceanic systems, using all available data from the beginning of exploitation. Industrialized fisheries typically reduced community biomass by 80% within 15 years of exploitation. Compensatory increases in fast-growing species were observed, but often reversed within a decade. Using a meta-analytic approach, we estimate that large predatory fish biomass today is only about 10% of pre-industrial levels. We conclude that declines of large predators in coastal regions5 have extended throughout the global ocean, with potentially serious consequences for ecosystems5,6,7. Our analysis suggests that management based on recent data alone may be misleading, and provides minimum estimates for unexploited communities, which could serve as the ‘missing baseline’8 needed for future restoration efforts.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Pauly, D. & Christensen, V. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374, 255–257 (1995)

  2. 2

    Tegner, M. J. & Dayton, P. K. Ecosystem effects of fishing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 261–262 (1999)

  3. 3

    Pauly, D. et al. Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418, 689–695 (2002)

  4. 4

    United Nations. World Summit on Sustainable Development: Plan of Implementation 〈http://www.johannanesburgsummit.org/html/documents/summit_docs/2309_planfinal.htm〉 (United Nations, New York, 2002)

  5. 5

    Jackson, J. B. C. et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293, 629–638 (2001)

  6. 6

    Steele, J. H. & Schumacher, M. Ecosystem structure before fishing. Fish. Res. 44, 201–205 (2000)

  7. 7

    Worm, B., Lotze, H. K., Hillebrand, H. & Sommer, U. Consumer versus resource control of species diversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature 417, 848–851 (2002)

  8. 8

    Pauly, D. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 430 (1995)

  9. 9

    Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T. & Falkowski, P. Primary production of the biosphere: integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281, 237–240 (1998)

  10. 10

    Myers, R. A., Hutchings, J. A. & Barrowman, N. J. Why do fish stocks collapse? The example of cod in Atlantic Canada. Ecol. Appl. 7, 91–106 (1997)

  11. 11

    Bullis, H. R. Preliminary report on exploratory longline fishing for tuna in the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Comm. Fish. Rev. 17, 1–15 (1955)

  12. 12

    Shomura, R. S. & Murphy, G. I. Longline Fishery for Deep-Swimming Tunas in the Central Pacific, 1953. US Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report: Fisheries No. 157 (USFWS, Washington, 1955)

  13. 13

    Davidian, M. & Giltinan, D. M. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995)

  14. 14

    Kock, K.-H. & Shimadzu, Y. in Southern Ocean Ecology: The BIOMASS Perspective (ed. El-Sayed, S. Z.) 287–312 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1994)

  15. 15

    Hutchings, J. A. & Myers, R. A. in The North Atlantic Fisheries: Successes, Failures and Challenges (eds Arnason, R. & Felt, L.) 38–93 (The Institute of Island Studies, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada, 1995)

  16. 16

    Rothschild, B. J. Competition for gear in a multiple-species fishery. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 31, 102–110 (1967)

  17. 17

    Lyne, V., Parslow, J., Young, J., Pearce, A. & Lynch, M. Development, Application and Evaluation of the Use of Remote Sensing Data by Australian Fisheries (CSIRO Marine Research, Hobart, Australia, 2000)

  18. 18

    Caton, A. E. A review of aspects of southern bluefin tuna biology, population and fisheries. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm. Spec. Rep. 7, 181–350 (1991)

  19. 19

    Stevens, J. D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N. K. & Walker, P. A. The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 476–494 (2000)

  20. 20

    Baum, J. K. et al. Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the Northwest Atlantic. Science 299, 389–392 (2003)

  21. 21

    Fogarty, M. J. & Murawski, S. A. Large-scale disturbance and the structure of marine systems: Fishery impacts on Georges Bank. Ecol. Appl. 8 (suppl.), 6–22 (1998)

  22. 22

    Watson, R. & Pauly, D. Systematic distortions in world fisheries catch trends. Nature 414, 534–536 (2001)

  23. 23

    Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R. & Torres, F. Jr Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279, 860–863 (1998)

  24. 24

    Roberts, C. M. Deep impact: the rising toll of fishing in the deep sea. Trends Ecol. Evol. 242, 242–245 (2002)

  25. 25

    Worm, B. & Myers, R. A. Meta-analysis of cod–shrimp interactions reveals top–down control in oceanic food webs. Ecology 84, 162–173 (2003)

  26. 26

    Myers, R. A. & Mertz, G. The limits of exploitation: a precautionary approach. Ecol. Appl. 8 (suppl.), 165–169 (1998)

  27. 27

    Casey, J. M. & Myers, R. A. Near extinction of a large, widely distributed fish. Science 281, 690–692 (1998)

  28. 28

    Casey, J. M. Fish Assemblages on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland. Thesis, Memorial Univ. Newfoundland, Canada (2000)

  29. 29

    Pauly, D. in Fish Population Dynamics (ed. Gulland, J. A.) 329–348 (Wiley, New York, 1988)

  30. 30

    Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources Statistical Bulletin Vol. 14 (CCAMLR, Hobart, Australia, 2002)

Download references


We thank J. Casey, A. Fonteneau, S. Hall, J. Hampton, S. Harley, J. Ianelli, I. Jonsen, J. Kitchell, K.-H. Kock, H. Lotze, M. Maunder, T. Nishida, M. Prager, T. Quinn, G. Scott and P. Ward for data, comments and suggestions, N. Barrowman and W. Blanchard for statistical advice, and D. Swan for technical assistance. This research is part of a larger project on pelagic longlining initiated and supported by the Pew Charitable Trusts. Further support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Author information


  1. Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J1, Canada

    • Ransom A. Myers
    •  & Boris Worm


  1. Search for Ransom A. Myers in:

  2. Search for Boris Worm in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ransom A. Myers.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history



Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.