Abstract
One of the few generalities in ecology, Taylor's power law1,2,3, describes the species-specific relationship between the temporal or spatial variance of populations and their mean abundances. For populations experiencing constant per capita environmental variability, the regression of log variance versus log mean abundance gives a line with a slope of 2. Despite this expectation, most species have slopes of less than 2 (refs 2, 3–4), indicating that more abundant populations of a species are relatively less variable than expected on the basis of simple statistical grounds. What causes abundant populations to be less variable has received considerable attention5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, but an explanation for the generality of this pattern is still lacking. Here we suggest a novel explanation for the scaling of temporal variability in population abundances. Using stochastic simulation and analytical models, we demonstrate how negative interactions among species in a community can produce slopes of Taylor's power law of less than 2, like those observed in real data sets. This result provides an example in which the population dynamics of single species can be understood only in the context of interactions within an ecological community.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taylor, L. R. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189, 732–735 (1961)
Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P. & Perry, J. N. The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. J. Anim. Ecol. 47, 383–406 (1978)
Taylor, L. R. & Woiwod, I. P. Comparative synoptic dynamics: 1. Relationships between interspecific and intraspecific spatial and temporal variance-mean population parameters. J. Anim. Ecol. 51, 879–906 (1982)
Taylor, L. R. & Woiwod, I. P. Temporal stability as a density-dependent species characteristic. J. Anim. Ecol. 49, 209–224 (1980)
Gillis, D. M., Kramer, D. L. & Bell, G. Taylor's Power Law as a consequence of Fretwell's ideal free distribution. J. Theor. Biol. 123, 281–288 (1986)
Perry, J. N. Some models for spatial variability of animal species. Oikos 51, 124–130 (1988)
Taylor, R. A. J. The behavioural basis of redistribution: 1. The DELTA-model concept. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 573–586 (1981)
Taylor, R. A. J. The behavioural basis of redistribution: 2. Simulations of the DELTA-model. J. Anim. Ecol. 50, 587–604 (1981)
Perry, J. N. Chaotic dynamics can generate Taylor's power law. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 221–226 (1994)
Taylor, L. R. & Taylor, R. A. J. Aggregation, migration and population mechanics. Nature 265, 415–421 (1977)
Hanski, I. Spatial patterns and movements in coprophageous beetles. Oikos 34, 293–310 (1980)
Anderson, R. M., Gordon, D. M., Crawley, M. J. & Hassell, M. P. Variability and the abundance of animal and plant species. Nature 296, 245–248 (1982)
Beissinger, S. R. & McCullough, D. R. (eds) Population Viability Analysis (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002)
Ives, A. R. & Hughes, J. B. General relationships between species diversity and stability in competitive systems. Am. Nat. 159, 388–395 (2002)
McCann, K. S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature 405, 228–233 (2000)
Tilman, D. Biodiversity: Population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77, 350–363 (1996)
Taylor, L. R. Synoptic dynamics, migration and the Rothamsted insect survey. J. Anim. Ecol. 55, 1–38 (1986)
Green, R. H. Power analysis and practical strategies for environmental monitoring. Environ. Res. 50, 195–206 (1989)
Thorarinsson, K. Population density and movement: A critique of DELTA-models. Oikos 46, 70–81 (1986)
Keeling, M. & Grenfell, B. Stochastic dynamics and a power law for measles variability. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354, 769–776 (1999)
Keeling, M. J. Simple stochastic models and their power-law type behaviour. Theor. Popul. Biol. 58, 21–31 (2000)
Titmus, G. Are animal populations really aggregated? Oikos 40, 64–68 (1983)
Schoener, T. W. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122, 240–285 (1983)
Gianoli, E. Competition in cereal aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) on wheat plants. Environ. Entomol. 29, 213–219 (2000)
Muller, C. B. & Godfray, H. C. J. Apparent competition between two aphid species. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 57–64 (1997)
McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G. R. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395, 794–798 (1998)
Berlow, E. L. Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398, 330–334 (1999)
Ives, A. R., Gross, K. & Klug, J. L. Stability and variability in competitive communities. Science 286, 542–544 (1999)
Ives, A. R., Dennis, B., Cottingham, K. L. & Carpenter, S. R. Estimating community stability and ecological interactions from time-series data. Ecol. Monogr. (in the press)
Acknowledgements
This manuscript was improved by the comments of B. Cardinale, K. Gross, L. Angeloni, A. Forbes and C. Williams. Funding was provided by the US National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilpatrick, A., Ives, A. Species interactions can explain Taylor's power law for ecological time series. Nature 422, 65–68 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01471
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01471
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.