Letter | Published:

FGFR-related gene nou-darake restricts brain tissues to the head region of planarians


The study of planarian regeneration may help us to understand how we can rebuild organs and tissues after injury, disease or ageing1. The robust regenerative abilities of planarians are based upon a population of totipotent stem cells (neoblasts)2,3,4, and among the organs regenerated by these animals is a well-organized central nervous system5,6. In recent years, methodologies such as whole-mount in situ hybridizations and double-stranded RNA have been extended to planarians with the aim of unravelling the molecular basis of their regenerative capacities7,8,9,10,11. Here we report the identification and characterization of nou-darake (ndk), a gene encoding a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-like molecule specifically expressed in the head region of the planarian Dugesia japonica. Loss of function of ndk by RNA interference results in the induction of ectopic brain tissues throughout the body. This ectopic brain formation was suppressed by inhibition of two planarian FGFR homologues (FGFR1 and FGFR2). Additionally, ndk inhibits FGF signalling in Xenopus embryos. The data suggest that ndk may modulate FGF signalling in stem cells to restrict brain tissues to the head region of planarians.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Pearson, H. The regeneration gap. Nature 414, 388–390 (2001)

  2. 2

    Baguñà, J., Saló, E. & Auladell, C. Regeneration and pattern formation in planarians. III. Evidence that neoblasts are totipotent stem cells and the source of blastema cells. Development 107, 77–86 (1989)

  3. 3

    Agata, K. & Watanabe, K. Molecular and cellular aspects of planarian regeneration. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 77–83 (1999)

  4. 4

    Newmark, P. A. & Sánchez Alvarado, A. Not your father's planarian: a classic model enters the era of functional genomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 210–219 (2002)

  5. 5

    Agata, K. et al. Structure of the planarian nervous system (CNS) revealed by neuronal cell markers. Zool. Sci. 15, 433–440 (1998)

  6. 6

    Cebrià, F. et al. Dissecting planarian CNS regeneration by the expression of neural-specific genes. Dev. Growth Differ. 44, 135–146 (2002)

  7. 7

    Kato, K., Orii, H., Watanabe, K. & Agata, K. The role of dorsoventral interaction in the onset of planarian regeneration. Development 126, 1031–1040 (1999)

  8. 8

    Kobayashi, C., Nogi, T., Watanabe, K. & Agata, K. Ectopic pharynxes arise by regional reorganization after anterior/posterior chimera in planarians. Mech. Dev. 89, 25–34 (1999)

  9. 9

    Orii, H. et al. The planarian HOM/HOX homeobox genes (Plox) expressed along the anteroposterior axis. Dev. Biol. 210, 456–468 (1999)

  10. 10

    Sánchez Alvarado, A. & Newmark, P. A. Double-stranded RNA specifically disrupts gene expression during planarian regeneration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5049–5054 (1999)

  11. 11

    Shibata, N. et al. Expression of vasa(vas)-related genes in germline cells and totipotent somatic stem cells of planarians. Dev. Biol. 206, 73–87 (1999)

  12. 12

    Umesono, Y., Watanabe, K. & Agata, K. Distinct structural domains in the planarian brain defined by the expression of evolutionarily conserved homeobox genes. Dev. Genes Evol. 209, 31–39 (1999)

  13. 13

    Cebrià, F. et al. The expression neural-specific genes reveals the structural and molecular complexity of the planarian central nervous system. Mech. Dev. 116, 199–204 (2002)

  14. 14

    Ogawa, K. et al. Planarian FGFR homologues expressed in stem cells and cephalic ganglions. Dev. Growth Differ. 44, 191–204 (2002)

  15. 15

    Wiedermann, M. & Trueb, B. Characterization of a novel protein (FGFRL1) from human cartilage related to FGF receptors. Genomics 69, 275–279 (2000)

  16. 16

    Fire, A. et al. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 391, 806–811 (1998)

  17. 17

    Amaya, E., Musci, T. J. & Kirschner, M. W. Expression of a dominant negative mutant of the FGF receptor disrupts mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell 66, 257–270 (1991)

  18. 18

    Conlon, F. L. & Smith, J. C. Interference with brachyury function inhibits convergent extension, causes apoptosis, and reveals separate requirements in the FGF and activin signalling pathways. Dev. Biol. 213, 85–100 (1999)

  19. 19

    Smith, J. C., Price, B. M., Green, J. B., Weigel, D. & Herrmann, B. G. Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction. Cell 67, 79–87 (1991)

  20. 20

    Isaacs, H. V., Pownall, M. E. & Slack, J. M. eFGF regulates Xbra expression during Xenopus gastrulation. EMBO J. 13, 4469–4481 (1994)

  21. 21

    Onichtchouk, D. et al. Silencing of TGF-β signalling by the pseudoreceptor BAMBI. Nature 401, 480–485 (1999)

  22. 22

    Tsang, M., Friesel, R., Kudoh, T. & Dawid, I. B. Identification of Sef, a novel modulator of FGF signaling. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 165–169 (2002)

  23. 23

    Fürthauser, M., Lin, W., Ang, S. L., Thisse, B. & Thisse, C. Sef is a feedback-induced antagonist of Ras/MAPK-mediated FGF signalling. Nature Cell Biol. 4, 170–174 (2002)

  24. 24

    Dowd, C. J., Cooney, C. L. & Nugent, M. A. Heparan sulfate mediates bFGF transport through basement membrane by diffusion with rapid reversible binding. J. Biol. Chem. 8, 5236–5244 (1999)

  25. 25

    Launay, C., Fromentoux, V., Shi, D. L. & Boucaut, J. C. A truncated FGF receptor blocks neural induction by endogenous Xenopus inducers. Development 122, 869–880 (1996)

  26. 26

    Streit, A., Berliner, A. J., Papanayotou, C., Sirulnik, A. & Stern, C. D. Initiation of neural induction by FGF signalling before gastrulation. Nature 406, 74–78 (2000)

  27. 27

    Tazaki, A. et al. Neural network in planarian revealed by an antibody against planarian synaptotagmin homologue. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 260, 426–432 (1999)

  28. 28

    Sakai, F., Agata, K., Orii, H. & Watanabe, K. Organization and regeneration ability of spontaneous supernumerary eyes in planarians—Eye regeneration field and pathway selection by optic nerves. Zool. Sci. 17, 375–381 (2000)

  29. 29

    Taira, M., Otani, H., Saint-Jeannet, J. P. & Dawid, I. B. Role of the LIM class homeodomain protein Xlim-1 in neural and muscle induction by the Spemann organizer in Xenopus. Nature 372, 677–679 (1994)

  30. 30

    Harland, R. M. in Methods in Cell Biology (eds Kay, B. K. & Peng, H. B.) 36, 685–695 (Academic, San Diego, 1991)

Download references


We thank S. Kuratani for comments on the manuscript, J. Brockes and T. Miyata for promoting collaboration, and D. Turner for pCS2 + and pCS2 + nβ-gal. This work was supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology (K.A.), a Grant-in-Aid for Creative Basic Research (K.A. and T.G.), a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (K.A. and M.T.) and the National Institutes of Health National Institute of General Medical Sciences (A.S.A.).

Author information

Correspondence to Kiyokazu Agata.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Figure 1 (JPG 34 kb)

Legend (DOC 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Further reading

Figure 1: Expression pattern of ndk and predicted structure.
Figure 2: Sequence comparison between the extracellular domains of NDK and the proteins encoded by human FGFRL1 and FGFR3 genes.
Figure 3: Effects of ndk-dsRNA injections during regeneration.
Figure 4: Brain expansion in intact animals.
Figure 5: Effects of ndk- and FGFR-dsRNA injections on regenerating head (a, c, e, g) and trunk (b, d, f, h) fragments.
Figure 6: Effects of ndk mRNA injections into Xenopus embryos.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.