Evidence for spin–charge separation in quasi-one-dimensional organic conductors

  • A Retraction to this article was published on 30 March 2006

Abstract

Interacting conduction electrons are usually described within Fermi-liquid theory1, which states that, in spite of strong interactions, the low-energy excitations are electron-like quasiparticles with charge and spin. In recent years there has been tremendous interest in conducting systems that are not Fermi liquids, motivated by the observation of highly anomalous metallic states in various materials, most notably the copper oxide superconductors2,3. Non-Fermi-liquid behaviour is generic to one-dimensional interacting electron systems, which are predicted to be Luttinger liquids4,5. One of their key properties is spin–charge separation: instead of quasiparticles, collective excitations of charge (with no spin) and spin (with no charge) are formed, which move independently and at different velocities. However, experimental confirmation of spin–charge separation remains a challenge. Here we report experiments probing the charge and heat current in quasi-one-dimensional conductors—the organic Bechgaard salts6,7,8,9,10. It was found that the charge and spin excitations have distinctly different thermal conductivities, which gives strong evidence for spin–charge separation. The spin excitations have a much larger thermal conductivity than the charge excitations, which indicates that the coupling of the charge excitations to the lattice is important.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Phase diagram for the (TM)2X compounds.
Figure 2: Thermal (k) and electrical (σ) conductivity of (TM)2X.
Figure 3: Thermal conductivity ka(T) parallel to the chains of the insulating spin-Peierls compound (TMTTF)2 PF6.

References

  1. 1

    Nozières, P. & Pines, D. The Theory of Quantum Liquids (Perseus, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1966)

  2. 2

    Orenstein, J. & Millis, A. J. Advances in the physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Science 288, 468–474 (2000)

  3. 3

    Hill, R. W., Proust, C., Taillefer, L., Fournier, P. & Greene, R. L. Breakdown of Fermi-liquid theory in a copper-oxide superconductor. Nature 414, 711–715 (2001)

  4. 4

    Voit, J. One-dimensional Fermi liquids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 977–1116 (1995)

  5. 5

    Gogolin, A. O., Nersesyan, A. A. & Tsvelik, A. M. Bosonization and Strongly Correlated Systems (Cambridge Univ., Cambridge, 1998)

  6. 6

    Jérome, D. & Schulz, H. J. Organic conductors and superconductors. Adv. Phys. 31, 299–490 (1982)

  7. 7

    Ishiguro, T., Yamaji, K. & Saito, G. Organic Superconductors (Springer, Berlin, 1998)

  8. 8

    Bourbonnais, C. Organic conductors: reduced dimensionality and correlation effects. Synth. Met. 84, 19–24 (1997)

  9. 9

    Bourbonnais, C. & Jérome, D. One-dimensional conductors. Phys. World 11(9), 41–45 (1998)

  10. 10

    Bourbonnais, C. & Jérome, D. in Advances in Synthetic Metals, Twenty Years of Progress in Science and Technology (eds Bernier, P., Lefrant, S. & Bidan, G.) 206–301 (Elsevier, New York, 1999)

  11. 11

    Bochrath, M. et al. Luttinger-liquid behaviour in carbon nanotubes. Nature 397, 598–601 (1999)

  12. 12

    Yacoby, A., Stormer, H. L., Baldwin, K. W., Pfeffer, L. N. & West, K. W. Magneto-transport spectroscopy on a quantum wire. Solid State Commun. 101, 77–81 (1995)

  13. 13

    Heeger, A. J., Kivelson, S., Schrieffer, J. R. & Su, W.-P. Solitons in conducting polymers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781–850 (1988)

  14. 14

    Djurek, D., Prester, M., Jérome, D. & Bechgaard, K. Magnetic field dependent thermal conductivity in the organic superconductor (TMTSF)2ClO4 . J. Phys. C 15, L669–L674 (1982)

  15. 15

    Choi, M.-Y., Chaikin, P. M. & Greene, R. L. Thermal conductivity of bis-tetramethyltetraselenafulvalen perchlorate [(TMTSF)2ClO4]. Phys. Rev. B 34, 7727–7732 (1986)

  16. 16

    Coulon, C. et al. A new survey of the physical properties of the (TMTTF)2X series. Role of the counterion ordering. J. Phys. 43, 1059–1067 (1982)

  17. 17

    Berman, R. Thermal Conduction in Solids (Clarendon, Oxford, 1976)

  18. 18

    Slack, G. A. in Solid State Physics Vol. 34 (eds Ehrenreich, H., Seitz, F. & Turnbull, D.) 1–71 (Academic, New York, 1979)

  19. 19

    Sologubenko, A. V., Gianno, K., Ott, H. R., Ammerahl, U. & Revcolevschi, A. Thermal conductivity of the hole-doped spin ladder system Sr14-xCaxCu24O41 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2714–2717 (2000)

  20. 20

    Sologubenko, A. V., Giannò, K., Ott, H. R., Vietkine, A. & Revcolevschi, A. Heat transport by lattice and spin excitations in the spin-chain compounds SrCuO2 and Sr2CuO3 . Phys. Rev. B 64, 054412-1–054412-11 (2001)

  21. 21

    Dumm, M. et al. Electron spin resonance studies on the organic linear-chain compound (TMTCF)2X (C = S,Se; X = PF6,AsF6,ClO4,Br). Phys. Rev. B 61, 511–520 (2000)

  22. 22

    Klümper, A. The spin-1/2 Heisenberg chain: thermodynamics, quantum criticality and spin-peierls exponents. Eur. Phys. J. B 5, 677–685 (1998)

  23. 23

    Schwarz, A. et al. On-chain electrodynamics of metallic (TMTSF)2X salts: Observation of Tomonaga-Luttinger liquid response. Phys. Rev. B 58, 1261–1271 (1998)

  24. 24

    Claessen, R. et al. Spectroscopic signature of spin-charge separation in the quasi-one-dimensional organic conductor TTF-TCNQ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 096402-1–096402-4 (2002)

  25. 25

    Zeini, B. et al. Thermal conductivity and thermal Hall effect in Bi- and Y-based high-Tc superconductors. Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 189–208 (2001)

  26. 26

    Engelsberg, S. & Varga, B. B. One-dimensional electron-photon model. Phys. Rev. 136, A1582–A1589 (1964)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Braden, C. Hess, J. Jérome, A.P. Kampf, D.I. Khomskii, E. Müller-Hartmann, H.R. Ott and G.A. Sawatzky for discussions. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and by the VolkswagenStiftung.

Author information

Correspondence to A. Freimuth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorenz, T., Hofmann, M., Grüninger, M. et al. Evidence for spin–charge separation in quasi-one-dimensional organic conductors. Nature 418, 614–617 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00913

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.