Instances of strikingly accurate Batesian mimicry (in which a palatable prey organism closely resembles an aversive model) are often cited to illustrate the power of natural selection1. Less attention has been paid to those mimics, such as many hoverfly (Syrphidae) mimics of wasps or bees, that resemble their models only poorly2,3,4. Attempts to provide an adaptive explanation for imperfect mimicry have suggested that what seems a crude resemblance to human observers may appear a close match to predators2, or that inaccurate mimics may bear a general resemblance to several different model species3,4. I show here, however, that truly inaccurate mimicry of a single model organism may be favoured over perfect resemblance, by kin selection. Signal detection theory predicts that predators will modify their level of discrimination adaptively in response to the relative frequencies and similarity of models and mimics5,6,7. If models are rare and/or weakly aversive, greater local similarity of mimics can thus lead to greater attack rates. Where individual mimics are related to others in their vicinity, kin selection will then oppose the evolution of accurate mimicry.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Wickler, W. Mimicry in Plants and Animals (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London, 1968)
Dittrich, W., Gilbert, F., Green, P., McGregor, P. & Grewcock, D. Imperfect mimicry: a pigeon's perspective. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251, 195–200 (1993)
Howse, P. E. & Allen, J. A. Satyric mimicry: the evolution of apparent imperfection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 111–114 (1994)
Edmunds, M. Why are there good and poor mimics? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70, 459–466 (2000)
Duncan, C. J. & Sheppard, P. M. Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Behaviour 24, 269–282 (1965)
Getty, T. Discriminability and the sigmoid functional response: how optimal foragers could stabilise model-mimic complexes. Am. Nat. 125, 239–256 (1985)
Greenwood, J. J. D. Crypsis, mimicry and switching by optimal foragers. Am. Nat. 128, 294–300 (1986)
Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930)
Gittleman, J. L. & Harvey, P. H. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 286, 149–150 (1980)
Harvey, P. H. & Paxton, R. J. The evolution of aposematic coloration. Oikos 37, 391–393 (1981)
Guilford, T. The evolution of conspicuous coloration. Am. Nat. 131, S7–S21 (1988)
Frank, S. A. Foundations of Social Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1998)
Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. & Lotem, A. How to detect a cuckoo-egg: a signal-detection theory model for recognition and learning. Am. Nat. 153, 633–648 (1999)
Pilecki, C. & O'Donald, P. The effects of predation on artificial mimetic polymorphisms with perfect and imperfect mimics at varying frequencies. Evolution 25, 365–370 (1971)
Hetz, M. & Slobodchikoff, C. N. Predation pressure on an imperfect Batesian mimicry complex in the presence of alternative prey. Oecologia 76, 570–573 (1988)
Lindström, L., Alatalo, R. V. & Mappes, J. Imperfect Batesian mimicry—the effects of the frequency and the distastefulness of the model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 149–153 (1997)
Mappes, J. & Alatalo, R. V. Batesian mimicry and signal accuracy. Evolution 51, 2050–2053 (1997)
Brower, J. V. Z. Experimental studies of mimicry. IV. The reactions of starlings to different proportions of models and mimics. Am. Nat. 94, 271–282 (1960)
Lea, R. G. & Turner, J. R. G. Experiments on mimicry: II. The effect of a Batesian mimic on its model. Behaviour 42, 131–151 (1972)
Goodale, M. A. & Sneddon, I. The effect of distastefulness of the model on the predation of artificial Batesian mimics. Anim. Behav. 25, 660–665 (1977)
Pfennig, D. W., Harcombe, W. R. & Pfennig, K. S. Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410, 323 (2001)
I thank R. Bshary, S. Dall, T. Getty, A. Lotem, S. Rands and A. Russell for comments and discussion.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Johnstone, R. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Nature 418, 524–526 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00845
Evolutionary Ecology (2021)
Persistence of multiple patterns and intraspecific polymorphism in multi-species Müllerian communities of net-winged beetles
Frontiers in Zoology (2019)
Nature Communications (2016)
Scientific Reports (2015)
Field estimates of survival do not reflect ratings of mimetic similarity in wasp-mimicking hover flies
Evolutionary Ecology (2014)