Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

New species of early human discovered near fossil of ‘Lucy’

This article has been updated

Australopithecus deyiremeda lived about 3.4 million years ago in northern Ethiopia, around the same time and place as Australopithecus afarensis.

The first fossil of Australopithecus deyiremeda, whose jaw is not like that of Lucy and her Australopithecus afarensis kind. Credit: Yohannes Haile-Selassie

Welcome, Lucy's neighbour. Fossilized jaws and teeth found1 in northern Ethiopia belong to an ancient human relative that researchers say lived around the same time as Lucy's kind, Australopithecus afarensis, but is a distinct species. The remains of the new species, which has been dubbed Australopithecus deyiremeda and lived between 3.5 million and 3.3 million years ago, were uncovered just 35 kilometres from the Hadar site at which Lucy and other A. afarensis individuals were found. Fossils from A. afarensis date to between 3.7 million and 3 million years ago, so the two species would have overlapped (although Lucy herself may have lived too recently to see one).

The find suggests that several distinct hominins — species more closely related to humans than to chimps — roamed eastern Africa more than 3 million years ago. A third species, Kenyanthropus platyops, lived in what is now Kenya around the same time2. “The question that is going to come up is which taxa gave rise to our genus, Homo,” says Yohannes Haille-Selassie, a palaeoanthropologist at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History in Ohio, whose team reports its discovery in Nature1. “That’s going to be the 64-million-dollar question.”

Odd one out

The researchers did not realize the significance of the remains when they found a lower and upper jaw in March 2011, on what was supposed to be the final day of their field season exploring the arid Woranso-Mille area in northern Ethiopia. “That forced us to extend our field stay,” says Haille-Selassie.

Given the close proximity of Hadar, which has yielded hundreds of fossils belonging to A. afarensis, including Lucy’s relatively complete remains, the team guessed that the bones belonged to that species. But closer inspection revealed that the lower jaw was beefier, and the teeth smaller, than those of the hominin's Hadar neighbours. Neither did K. platyops — defined by a flat-faced 3.5-million-year-old skull found near Lake Turkana, Kenya — prove a compelling match.

“We’re convinced this is different from all the species we know,” says Haille-Selassie. To make an even stronger case, his team hopes to link the A. deyiremeda jawbones to foot fossils from an as-yet unidentified species that his team also found in Woranso-Mille3, which belonged to a creature that spent more time in the trees than Lucy’s kind. “Then we’ll be in a better position to say this is a totally new species,” says Haille-Selassie. The species name deyiremeda derives from words in the local Afar language meaning ‘close’ and ‘relative’.

Haille-Selassie says it is unsurprising that several hominins lived in East Africa some 3.5 million years ago; their descendants were similarly diverse one million years later.

Fred Spoor, a palaeontologist at University College London who wrote an accompanying News and Views article on the Nature study4, speculates that the two species may both have been able to thrive side-by-side because they might not have directly competed for food, shelter and territory. The distinct jaw shapes of A. deyiremeda and A. afarensis could mean that they used their teeth on different kinds of food. But with so little evidence to hand, Spoor warns against jumping to conclusions about the relationship between the two species. "We shouldn’t suddenly think they stood at the Awash River, shook hands and said, ‘What are you doing here?’”

The jaw of Australopithecus deyiremeda (cast pictured) is not like that of Lucy and her species. Credit: Laura Dempsey

Change history

  • 28 May 2015

    The first line and headline of an earlier version of this story referred to the newly discovered species as a “human ancestor”. In fact, it is not clear whether this species is a direct ancestor of modern humans or merely a relative. The text has been amended.

References

  1. Haile-Selassie, Y. et al. Nature 521, 483-488 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Leakey, M. G. et al. Nature 410, 433-440 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haile-Selassie, Y. et al. Nature 483, 565–569 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Spoor, F. Nature 521 432-433 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Read the related News & Views.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Oldest stone tools raise questions about their creators 2015-Apr-21

Lucy discoverer on the ancestor people relate to 2014-Nov-21

Ancient human ancestor had feet like an ape 2012-Mar-28

These bones were made for walking 2011-Feb-10

Butchering dinner 3.4 million years ago 2010-Aug-11

Africa's next top hominid 2010-Jun-21

Little 'Lucy' fossil found 2006-Sep-20

Related external links

Worsano-Mille palaeontological research project

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Callaway, E. New species of early human discovered near fossil of ‘Lucy’. Nature (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17644

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.17644

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing