Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Green List promotes best conservation areas

A Correction to this article was published on 10 December 2014

This article has been updated

Project puts spotlight on protected reserves that boost biodiversity.

Conservation groups often highlight species or ecosystems at risk. An effort launched on 14 November turns that approach on its head, seeking for the first time to systematically recognize the world's best-managed protected areas, which offer the most favourable conditions for flora and fauna.

Nature makes all articles free to view Investigations launched into artificial tracheas Bullet-proof armour and hydrogen sieve add to graphene’s promise

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) unveiled its Green List of 23 sites at the World Parks Congress in Sydney, Australia. The group, based in Gland, Switzerland, has long maintained a Red List of threatened species, which scientists and governments use as one measure of progress towards various biodiversity goals.

By some measures, global conservation efforts are succeeding. In 2010, the international Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) set a goal of protecting 17% of Earth's land surface and 10% of its oceans by 2020. Currently, 15.4% of land areas and 3.4% of oceans are set aside as protected areas, according to figures released on 13 November by the UN Environment Programme.

Make it count

But not all conservation areas are created equal. For example, Australia's extensive network of marine reserves — which includes the iconic Great Barrier Reef — has had very little impact on marine conservation, researchers reported in Aquatic Conservation in February1. This is because many of the reserve locations were chosen to avoid damaging commercial interests, rather than to best protect areas of ecological importance, the study found.

“Protected areas are of no use if they are not managed or governed properly,” says James Hardcastle, who is leading the Green List project for the IUCN. And research published on 14 November in Nature suggests that creating protected areas is not enough to safeguard the future of plant and animal life2.

These secured zones currently cover just 19% of the habitat of the planet's terrestrial vertebrate species, the study finds. That share could triple if the world achieves the 2020 CBD conservation target. But land-use changes, such as expanding agricultural zones, threaten to erode biodiversity. If current trends continue, the ranges of almost 1,000 threatened species could be halved by 2040.

Federico Montesino Pouzols, a bioinformatician at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in Harwell, UK, and an author of the study, says that international collaboration — such as the Green List — is essential to create effective protected areas.

Drawing up the list

The IUCN approved the Green List concept in 2012, at its World Conservation Congress in Jeju, South Korea. The group asked governments to nominate sites for inclusion, using 20 criteria such as whether a site focuses on protecting species within its boundaries or whether it takes a broader approach, looking beyond its own borders.

In the end, the IUCN accepted 23 of 27 candidate sites (including those included in the slideshow above). The successful sites include the Mount Huangshan scenic area in China, which was praised for its management of the throngs of tourists that visit every year, and the Galeras wildlife sanctuary in Colombia, cited for a design that captures the most important aspects of the region's varied terrain, such as a volcanic complex, mountain forests and lowland valleys.

Green List sites are also judged on how they treat people who have historically lived in or used the land — addressing human-rights advocates' concerns that protected areas often exclude indigenous people from sites on which they rely. 

This is still happening in some areas. For example, in 2010 the United Kingdom set up a marine reserve around the Chagos Islands in the Indian Ocean. The islands' original inhabitants, who were evicted in the early 1970s to make way for a US military base, are effectively barred from accessing the area by the policies of the British Indian Ocean Territory administration.

“This is one site that won't be getting on to the Green List for a while,” says Hardcastle.

Credit: Alastair Pollock Photography/Getty Images

Change history

  • 17 November 2014

    This article originally said that protected areas cover 169% of terrestrial-vertebrate habitat; it should have said 19%. It also said that original inhabitants of the Chagos Islands were barred from returning by protected-area restrictions, rather than policies of the British Indian Ocean Territory administration. The text has now been corrected.


  1. Devillers, R. et al. Aquat. Conserv. (2014).

  2. Pouzols, F. M. et al. Nature (2014).

Download references


Additional information

A shorter version of this story was published in the 20 November print edition of Nature under the headline 'Green List promotes conservation hotspots'.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Conservation: A to-do list for the world's parks 2014-Nov-05

Future of Great Barrier Reef divides scientists 2014-Nov-05

The invisible extinction 2014-Oct-21

‘Life on Earth’ project gets under way 2014-Jun-25

World governments establish biodiversity panel 2012-Apr-23

Ocean conservation: Uncertain sanctuary 2011-Dec-07

Blog: Conservationists to highlight successes with species green list

Related external links

International Union for Conservation of Nature

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilbert, N. Green List promotes best conservation areas. Nature 515, 322 (2014).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing