Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Antioxidants speed cancer in mice

Study suggests supplements such as vitamin E promote tumour growth.

Antioxidants like Vitamin E may not protect against cancer. Credit: Tetra images/Thinkstock

A study in mice has found that two commonly used antioxidants — vitamin E and a compound called N-acetylcysteine (NAC) — speed the growth of lung cancer rather than curb it.

Originality takes second place for young scientists with extreme workloads Why flawed diamonds are advancing quantum computing How plant-killing fungi protect forest diversity

The results, published today in Science Translational Medicine1, may be contrary to the expectations of the millions of people who gulp down vitamin E supplements each day. A survey published in 20052 found that about 11% of US adults took vitamin E supplements, at doses of 400 international units (IU) or higher. The recommended daily intake is 22.4 IU.

The rationale had been that vitamin E and other antioxidants could prevent certain reactive compounds in the body from damaging cellular components, including DNA. Because DNA damage has been linked to cancer, it stood to reason that reducing DNA damage might prevent or slow the disease.

Studies in animals and small clinical trials in humans supported this conclusion, but larger trials have not. When antioxidants such as vitamin E and β-carotene were rigorously tested in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, the results were ambiguous at best. A 1994 study3 of 29,133 male smokers even found a higher incidence of lung cancer in those who received β-carotene supplements.

“The results have been mixed,” says Martin Bergö, a molecular biologist at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and a co-author of the latest study. “The take-home message is that they do not decrease the risk of cancer and may even increase risk of some cancers in some populations.”

Supplemental effects

Bergö and his colleague, Per Lindahl, also a molecular biologist at the University of Gothenburg, stumbled into the antioxidant debate accidentally. The team was conducting unrelated experiments in mice that were genetically engineered to develop lung cancer, and decided to dose the mice with NAC as a control. If anything, they thought that NAC might slow the tumours slightly, says Lindahl. Instead, the control tumours grew three times faster than expected. “The real experiment turned out to be a disappointment,” he says. “But the control was quite interesting.”

The team decided to dig deeper, and expanded its study to include another common antioxidant, vitamin E. The researchers fed either NAC or vitamin E to the mice, using doses of 5 or 50 times higher than the daily recommended amount for mice. Human dietary supplements often have 4 to 20 times the recommended daily intake of vitamin E for humans, says Lindahl. The results for the two antioxidants were similar: tumours grew about three times faster than those in animals that did not receive the treatment. Treated mice also died from their cancers about twice as quickly as untreated mice.

Treatment with NAC or vitamin E also spurred the growth of human lung-cancer cells grown in culture. In both mouse models and human cells, the antioxidants seemed to protect cancer cells by reducing the amount of DNA damage. That, in turn, reduced expression of a protein called p53. Known as the ‘guardian of the genome’, p53 is a protein that normally suppresses tumour growth and is activated by damaged DNA.

Cause for concern

Lindahl is quick to note that the results are in mice and might not translate to humans. The study also does not address cancer prevention: the genes that triggered the tumours in the mice had already been activated when the antioxidants were added to their diet. “Our study does not say anything about how antioxidant supplementation affects cancer risk in apparently healthy people,” he says.

But Lindahl says that the work does call for a closer look at the effects of antioxidants in smokers, who are at high risk for lung cancer and may already carry small tumours while outwardly seeming healthy. He is also concerned about people with a common lung ailment called chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who are sometimes treated with NAC to reduce mucus production. Those people are often smokers, he notes, and tend to be at higher risk of lung cancer.

Ultimately, the study demonstrates that there might be no simple explanation for the role of antioxidants in cancer, says Peng Huang, a researcher at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Antioxidants could help to prevent tumours from forming, he says, but once the tumours are there, the supplements might be harmful. “There’s a big confusion out there now,” says Huang. “But we just need to concede that these effects are context-dependent.”

References

  1. Sayin, V. I. et al. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 221ra15 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, E. S., Ajani, U. A., & Mokdad, A. H. Ann. Intern. Med. 143, 116-120 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. The Alpha-Tocopherol Beta Carotene Cancer Prevention Study Group N. Engl. J. Med. 330, 1029-1035 (1994).

Download references

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Antioxidants dispel static electricity 2013-Sep-19

Nutrition advice: The vitamin D-lemma 2011-Jul-06

Cancer: When antioxidants are bad 2011-Jul-06

Antioxidants can change fish behaviour 2007-Nov-08

Related external links

US National Cancer Institute: Antioxidants and cancer

American Cancer Society: Vitamin E

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ledford, H. Antioxidants speed cancer in mice. Nature (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.14606

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.14606

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing