Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Triceratops-like dinosaur reveals regional diversity

Fossil find supports hypothesis that similar but separate species evolved on same landmass.

Fossil bones of a novel dinosaur (seen here in a reconstruction) suggest that unrelated lineages could coexist on different parts of what was then a large island. Credit: Rob Gaston

It looks like a Triceratops, but it isn't one. With an enlarged nose and a pair of unusually long horns over its eyes, a dinosaur fossil discovered in Utah could help to answer a question that has long had palaeontologists scratching their heads.

The discovery of an almost complete skull and two front legs from a dinosaur body that would have been about five metres long is reported1 today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B by palaeontologist Scott Sampson, chief curator at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science in Colorado, and his colleagues.

The 76-million-year-old dinosaur, which the team has named Nasutoceratops titusi, was found in the Kaiparowits Formation. This group of rocks is in a region of the western United States that when the beast walked the Earth was part of a long, thin island called Laramidia, cut off from the rest of North America by a warm sea. Sampson says that many large ancient creatures on Laramidia were “provincial”: separated into similar but distinct species at the north and the south of the island. That is surprising because the comparatively few large land species that exist today — such as hippos and rhinos in Africa — tend to be spread across whole continents, without character differences.

There has been debate over whether fossils from Laramidia actually represent different species, or in fact are animals that lived at different times2. Yet Nasutoceratops belongs to a group that has a different common ancestor to all the other Triceratops-like fossils found in either north or south Laramidia. “This time, it’s not just the species that’s different; this animal is from an entirely different group of dinosaurs,” says Sampson.

What caused the different species to evolve remains unclear. Impassable mountains or rivers have both been suggested as reasons that populations became separated and evolved differently. However, such features are unlikely to have separated north and south Laramidia for long enough for that to happen.

References

  1. Sampson, S. D., Lund, E. K., Loewen, M. A., Farke, A. A. & Clayton, K. E. Proc. R. Soc. B http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1186 (2013).

  2. Vavrek, M. J. & Larsson, H. C. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8265-8268 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

How to eat a Triceratops 2012-Oct-24

Fossil scars capture dinosaur headbutts 2012-Oct-19

Blogpost: Secrets of a mastodon graveyard

Related external links

Scott Sampson on provincial dinosaurs (blog)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howgego, J. Triceratops-like dinosaur reveals regional diversity. Nature (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.13400

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2013.13400

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing