Review Article | Published:

Uncovering the structure–function relationship in spider silk

Nature Reviews Materials volume 3, Article number: 18008 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

All spiders produce protein-based biopolymer fibres that we call silk. The most studied of these silks is spider dragline silk, which is very tough and relatively abundant compared with other types of spider silks. Considerable research has been devoted to understanding the relationship between the molecular structure and mechanical properties of spider dragline silks. In this Review, we overview experimental and computational studies that have provided a wealth of detail at the molecular level on the highly conserved repetitive core and terminal regions of spider dragline silk. We also discuss the role of the nanocrystalline β-sheets and amorphous regions in determining the properties of spider silk fibres, endowing them with strength and elasticity. Additionally, we outline imaging techniques and modelling studies that elucidate the importance of the hierarchical structure of silk fibres at the molecular level. These insights into structure–function relationships can guide the reverse engineering of spider silk to enable the production of superior synthetic fibres.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Nylon: a revolution in textiles. Distillations (2008).

  2. 2.

    , & The science of silks. MRS Bull. 38, 73–80 (2013).

  3. 3.

    & Silks as ancient models for modern polymers. Polymer 50, 5623–5632 (2009).

  4. 4.

    et al. A conserved spider silk domain acts as a molecular switch that controls fibre assembly. Nature 465, 239–242 (2010).

  5. 5.

    & Silk as a biomaterial. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32, 991–1007 (2007).

  6. 6.

    et al. Elastic proteins: biological roles and mechanical properties. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B Biol Sci. 357, 121–132 (2002).

  7. 7.

    , , , & Insect silk: one name, many materials. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 171–188 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Spider silk: a brief review and prospectus on research linking biomechanics and ecology in draglines and orb webs. J. Arachnol. 40, 1–12 (2012).

  9. 9.

    , & Decoding the secrets of spider silk. Mater. Today 14, 80–86 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Spider silk: ancient ideas for new biomaterials. Chem. Rev. 106, 3762–3774 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Increasing silk fibre strength through heterogeneity of bundled fibrils. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130148 (2013).

  12. 12.

    , , , & Short and long range order of the morphology of silk from Latrodectus hesperus (Black Widow) as characterized by atomic force microscopy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24, 151–157 (1999).

  13. 13.

    et al. Old silks endowed with new properties. Macromolecules 42, 8977–8982 (2009).

  14. 14.

    , , & Evidence of a cholesteric liquid crystalline phase in natural silk spinning processes. Macromolecules 29, 5106–5110 (1996).

  15. 15.

    , , & Shear-induced self-assembly of native silk proteins into fibrils studied by atomic force microscopy. Biomacromolecules 13, 676–682 (2012).

  16. 16.

    et al. Design of superior spider silk: From nanostructure to mechanical properties. Biophys. J. 91, 4528–4535 (2006).

  17. 17.

    , , , & in Silk Polymers: Materials Science and Biotechnology (eds , , & ) 196–210 (American Chemical Society, Washington, 1994).

  18. 18.

    & Changes in element composition along the spinning duct in a Nephila spider. Naturwissenschaften 88, 179–182 (2001).

  19. 19.

    , , & Microstructural homogeneity of support silk spun by Eriophora fuliginea (C. L. Koch) determined by scanning X-ray microdiffraction. Naturwissenschaften 88, 67–72 (2001).

  20. 20.

    Spider silks: recombinant synthesis, assembly, spinning, and engineering of synthetic proteins. Microb. Cell Fact. 3, 14 (2004).

  21. 21.

    , , , & The influence of anaesthesia on the tensile properties of spider silk. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 320–326 (2006).

  22. 22.

    , , & Nanostructural features of a spider dragline silk as revealed by electron and X-ray diffraction studies. Polymer 47, 5633–5642 (2006).

  23. 23.

    & Biological liquid crystal elastomers. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol Sci. 357, 155–163 (2002).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk microstructure studied by scanning transmission X-ray microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 3897–3905 (2007).

  25. 25.

    , , & Transmission X-ray microscopy of spider dragline silk. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 40, 87–95 (2007).

  26. 26.

    & Liquid crystals and flow elongation in a spider's silk production line. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 266, 519–523 (1999).

  27. 27.

    & Molecular order in spider major ampullate silk (dragline): effects of spinning rate and post-spin drawing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 72, 895–903 (1999).

  28. 28.

    , , , & in Silk Polymers: Materials Science and Biotechnology (eds , , & ) 120–136 (1994).

  29. 29.

    & Subdiffraction-limited radius measurements of microcylinders using conventional bright-field optical microscopy. Opt. Lett. 39, 5196–5199 (2014).

  30. 30.

    , & WISE NMR characterization of nanoscale heterogeneity and mobility in supercontracted Nephila clavipes spider dragline silk. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5867–5872 (2004).

  31. 31.

    & Recombinant production, characterization, and fiber spinning of an engineered short major ampullate spidroin (MaSp1s). Biomacromolecules 18, 1365–1372 (2017).

  32. 32.

    & Structure of a protein superfiber: spider dragline silk. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7120–7124 (1990).

  33. 33.

    Spider silk: the unraveling of a mystery. Acc. Chem. Res. 25, 392–398 (1992).

  34. 34.

    , & Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24, 271–275 (1999).

  35. 35.

    & Biotechnological production of spider-silk proteins enables new applications. Macromol. Biosci. 7, 401–409 (2007).

  36. 36.

    , , & Nonlinear material behaviour of spider silk yields robust webs. Nature 482, 72–76 (2012).

  37. 37.

    , , & Nanoconfinement controls stiffness, strength and mechanical toughness of beta-sheet crystals in silk. Nat. Mater. 9, 359–367 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Silk evolution untangled. Nature 466, 319 (2010).

  39. 39.

    et al. Biomimetic fibers made of recombinant spidroins with the same toughness as natural spider silk. Adv. Mater. 27, 2189–2194 (2015).

  40. 40.

    , , & The hidden link between supercontraction and mechanical behavior of spider silks. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. 4, 658–669 (2011).

  41. 41.

    & Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410, 541–548 (2001).

  42. 42.

    , & The structure and properties of spider silk. Endeavour 10, 37–43 (1986).

  43. 43.

    , , & Variation in the material properties of spider dragline silk across species. Appl. Phys. A 82, 213–218 (2006).

  44. 44.

    , , & An investigation of the divergence of major ampullate silk fibers from Nephila clavipes and Argiope aurantia. Biomacromolecules 6, 3095–3099 (2005).

  45. 45.

    , & Bioprospecting finds the toughest biological material: extraordinary silk from a giant riverine orb spider. PLOS ONE 5, e11234 (2010).

  46. 46.

    et al. Sequential origin in the high performance properties of orb spider dragline silk. Sci. Rep. 2, 782 (2012).

  47. 47.

    , , & The mechanical design of spider silks: from fibroin sequence to mechanical function. J. Exp. Biol. 202, 3295–3303 (1999).

  48. 48.

    Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, United Kingdom, 2010).

  49. 49.

    & Spider silk as archetypal protein elastomer. Soft Matter 2, 377–385 (2006).

  50. 50.

    , , & Natural and unnatural silks. Polymer 48, 3388–3392 (2007).

  51. 51.

    , & There are many more lessons still to be learned from spider silks. Soft Matter 7, 9595–9600 (2011).

  52. 52.

    et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of dragline silk from the spider Nephila clavipes. Polymer. Adv. Tech. 5, 401–410 (1994).

  53. 53.

    , & Relationships between supercontraction and mechanical properties of spider silk. Nat. Mater. 4, 901–905 (2005).

  54. 54.

    , & The effect of spinning conditions on the mechanics of a spider's dragline silk. Proc. Biol. Sci. 268, 2339–2346 (2001).

  55. 55.

    , , & Non-invasive determination of the complete elastic moduli of spider silks. Nat. Mater. 12, 262–267 (2013).

  56. 56.

    et al. Nonlinear control of high-frequency phonons in spider silk. Nat. Mater. 15, 1079–1083 (2016).

  57. 57.

    , & Spider silk: super material or thin fibre? Adv. Mater. 25, 1275–1279 (2013).

  58. 58.

    et al. Strain-dependent fractional molecular diffusion in humid spider silk fibres. J. R. Soc. Interface 13, 20160506 (2016).

  59. 59.

    et al. How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 1981–1989 (2009).

  60. 60.

    Viscoelastic behaviour and wet supercontraction of major ampullate silk fibres of certain orb-web-building spiders (Araneae ). J. Exp. Biol. 118, 379–404 (1985).

  61. 61.

    , , & Analysis of spider silk in native and supercontracted states using Raman spectroscopy. Polymer 40, 2493–2500 (1999).

  62. 62.

    et al. Supercontraction and backbone dynamics in spider silk: 13C and 2H NMR studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 9019–9025 (2000).

  63. 63.

    , , , & Mechanical testing of engineered spider silk filaments provides insights into molecular features on a mesoscale. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 892–900 (2017).

  64. 64.

    , , & Recovery in spider silk fibers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 92, 3537–3541 (2004).

  65. 65.

    , , & Self-tightening of spider silk fibers induced by moisture. Polymer 44, 5785–5788 (2003).

  66. 66.

    , & Controlled supercontraction tailors the tensile behaviour of spider silk. Polymer 44, 3733–3736 (2003).

  67. 67.

    , , & Proline and processing of spider silks. Biomacromolecules 9, 116–121 (2008).

  68. 68.

    Molecular modeling of spider silk elasticity. Macromolecules 27, 7378–7381 (1994).

  69. 69.

    , & Damage, self-healing, and hysteresis in spider silks. Biophys. J. 98, 1941–1948 (2010).

  70. 70.

    et al. Molecular nanosprings in spider capture-silk threads. Nat. Mater. 2, 278–283 (2003).

  71. 71.

    & Hierarchical chain model of spider capture silk elasticity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028104 (2005).

  72. 72.

    , , , & Modeling of the stress-strain behavior of egg sac silk of the spider Araneus diadematus. J. Arachnol. 33, 629–639 (2005).

  73. 73.

    , & Predicting the mechanical properties of spider silk as a model nanostructured polymer. Eur. Phys. J. E. Soft Matter 16, 199–206 (2005).

  74. 74.

    & Spider silk as a model biomaterial. Appl. Phys. A 82, 205–212 (2005).

  75. 75.

    , , & Force distribution determines optimal length of β-sheet crystals for mechanical robustness. Soft Matter 7, 1308–1311 (2011).

  76. 76.

    Protein unfolding versus β-sheet separation in spider silk nanocrystals. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 5, 015015 (2014).

  77. 77.

    & Geometric confinement governs the rupture strength of H-bond assemblies at a critical length scale. Nano Lett. 8, 743–748 (2008).

  78. 78.

    , , , & Mechanical response of silk crystalline units from force-distribution analysis. Biophys. J. 96, 3997–4005 (2009).

  79. 79.

    & Sequence-structure correlations in silk: poly-Ala repeat of N. clavipes MaSp1 is naturally optimized at a critical length scale. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 7, 30–40 (2012).

  80. 80.

    , & Development and application of enhanced sampling techniques to simulate the long-time scale dynamics of biomolecular systems. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 112, 33–43 (2012).

  81. 81.

    & Nanostructure and molecular mechanics of spider dragline silk protein assemblies. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1709–1721 (2010).

  82. 82.

    & Molecular mechanics of silk nanostructures under varied mechanical loading. Biopolymers 97, 408–417 (2012).

  83. 83.

    , & Dissecting the structural determinants for the difference in mechanical stability of silk and amyloid beta-sheet stacks. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 8765–8771 (2013).

  84. 84.

    , & Bottom-up computational modeling of semi-crystalline fibers: from atomistic to continuum scale. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 10426–10429 (2011).

  85. 85.

    , , , & Silk fiber mechanics from multiscale force distribution analysis. Biophys. J. 100, 1298–1305 (2011).

  86. 86.

    , & Effects of crystalline subunit size on silk fiber mechanics. Soft Matter 7, 8142 (2011).

  87. 87.

    , & Rate-dependent behavior of the amorphous phase of spider dragline silk. Biophys. J. 106, 2511–2518 (2014).

  88. 88.

    , , , & Molecular and nanostructural mechanisms of deformation, strength and toughness of spider silk fibrils. Nano Lett. 10, 2626–2634 (2010).

  89. 89.

    & Atomistic model of the spider silk nanostructure. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 153701 (2010).

  90. 90.

    , , & Nanoconfinement of spider silk fibrils begets superior strength, extensibility, and toughness. Nano Lett. 11, 5038–5046 (2011).

  91. 91.

    , , , & What's inside the box? — Length-scales that govern fracture processes of polymer fibers. Adv. Mater. 26, 412–417 (2014).

  92. 92.

    , & Structure of characteristic sequences in Nephila clavipes dragline silk (MaSp1) studied with 13C solid state NMR. Polym. J. 36, 999–1003 (2004).

  93. 93.

    , , & 13C Solid-state NMR study of structural heterogeneity in peptides containing both polyalanine and repeated GGA sequences as a local structural model of Nephila clavipes dragline silk (Spidroin 1). Macromolecules 38, 3356–3363 (2005).

  94. 94.

    , , , & Determination of the torsion angles of alanine and glycine residues of model compounds of spider silk (AGG)(10) using solid-state NMR methods. J. Biomol. NMR 25, 91–103 (2003).

  95. 95.

    et al. Characterizing the secondary protein structure of black widow dragline silk using solid-state NMR and X-ray diffraction. Biomacromolecules 14, 3472–3483 (2013).

  96. 96.

    , , & Local structure in spider dragline silk investigated by two-dimensional spin-diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance. Macromolecules 29, 2920–2928 (1996).

  97. 97.

    , & Molecular disorder and structure of spider dragline silk investigated by two-dimensional solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Macromolecules 40, 1995–2001 (2007).

  98. 98.

    , , , & Structure of model peptides based on Nephila clavipes dragline silk spidroin (MaSp1) studied by C-13 cross polarization/magic angle spinning NMR. Biomacromolecules 6, 3220–3226 (2005).

  99. 99.

    , , , & Determining secondary structure in spider dragline silk by carbon–carbon correlation solid-state NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 9871–9877 (2008).

  100. 100.

    , , & The molecular structure of spider dragline silk: folding and orientation of the protein backbone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10266–10271 (2002).

  101. 101.

    & Structure of polyglycine-II. Nature 176, 780–781 (1955).

  102. 102.

    & Helix geometry in proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 201, 601–619 (1988).

  103. 103.

    et al. Secondary structure adopted by the Gly-Gly-X repetitive regions of dragline spider silk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 2023 (2016).

  104. 104.

    , & Secondary structure transition and critical stress for a model of spider silk assembly. Biomacromolecules 17, 427–436 (2016).

  105. 105.

    et al. Predictive modelling-based design and experiments for synthesis and spinning of bioinspired silk fibres. Nat. Commun. 6, 6892 (2015).

  106. 106.

    , , , & Blueprint for a high-performance biomaterial: full-length spider dragline silk genes. PLOS ONE 2, e514 (2007).

  107. 107.

    , & A proposed model for dragline spider silk self-assembly: insights from the effect of the repetitive domain size on fiber properties. Biopolymers 93, 458–468 (2010).

  108. 108.

    & Isolation of a clone encoding a second dragline silk fibroin. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 19320–19324 (1992).

  109. 109.

    , , & Silk properties determined by gland-specific expression of a spider fibroin gene family. Science 272, 112–115 (1996).

  110. 110.

    & Fiber morphology of spider silk: the effects of tensile deformation. Macromolecules 30, 2860–2867 (1997).

  111. 111.

    et al. Aspects of X-ray diffraction on single spider fibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 24, 179–186 (1999).

  112. 112.

    et al. Solid-state NMR evidence for elastin-like b-turn structure in spider dragline silk. Chem. Commun. 46, 6714–6716 (2010).

  113. 113.

    , , & Diffraction from the beta-sheet crystallites in spider silk. Eur. Phys. J. E. Soft Matter 27, 229–242 (2008).

  114. 114.

    , , , & Elucidating silk structure using solid-state NMR. Soft Matter 9, 11440–11450 (2013).

  115. 115.

    et al. Silk structure studied with nuclear magnetic resonance. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 69, 23–68 (2013).

  116. 116.

    , & Determining hydrogen-bond interactions in spider silk with 1H−13C HETCOR fast MAS solid-state NMR and DFT proton chemical shift calculations. Chem. Commun. 49, 6680–6682 (2013).

  117. 117.

    , , , & Structure and dynamics of aromatic residues in spider silk: 2D carbon correlation NMR of dragline fibers. Biomacromolecules 11, 168–174 (2010).

  118. 118.

    , , , & Quantitative correlation between the protein primary sequences and secondary structures in spider dragline silks. Biomacromolecules 11, 192–200 (2010).

  119. 119.

    , & Molecular dynamics of spider dragline silk fiber investigated by 2H MAS NMR. Biomacromolecules 16, 852–859 (2015).

  120. 120.

    , & Elucidating proline dynamics in spider dragline silk fibre using 2H−13C HETCOR MAS NMR. Chem. Commun. 50, 4856–4859 (2014).

  121. 121.

    , & Protein secondary structure and orientation in silk as revealed by Raman spectromicroscopy. Biophys. J. 92, 2885–2895 (2007).

  122. 122.

    , & Conformation and orientation of proteins in various types of silk fibers produced by Nephila clavipes spiders. Biomacromolecules 10, 2945–2953 (2009).

  123. 123.

    & Self-assembled semi-crystallinity at parallel beta-sheet nanocrystal interfaces in clustered MaSp1 (spider silk) proteins. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 58, 366–371 (2016).

  124. 124.

    , , & Analysis of the conserved N-terminal domains in major ampullate spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 6, 3152–3159 (2005).

  125. 125.

    , , & N-terminal nonrepetitive domain common to dragline, flagelliform, and cylindriform spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 7, 3120–3124 (2006).

  126. 126.

    , & Untangling spider silk evolution with spidroin terminal domains. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 243 (2010).

  127. 127.

    , , , & Solution structure of eggcase silk protein and its implications for silk fiber formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8907–8911 (2009).

  128. 128.

    et al. Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay. Nature 465, 236–239 (2010).

  129. 129.

    , , , & Effect of pH on the structure of the recombinant C-terminal domain of Nephila clavipes dragline silk protein. Biomacromolecules 15, 4447–4454 (2014).

  130. 130.

    A structural view on spider silk proteins and their role in fiber assembly. J. Pept. Sci. 18, 357–365 (2012).

  131. 131.

    , & Spidroin N-terminal domain promotes a pH-dependent association of silk proteins during self-assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 40745–40753 (2010).

  132. 132.

    , & Review the role of terminal domains during storage and assembly of spider silk proteins. Biopolymers 97, 355–361 (2012).

  133. 133.

    et al. Acidic residues control the dimerization of the N-terminal domain of black widow spiders’ major ampullate spidroin 1. Sci. Rep. 6, 34442 (2016).

  134. 134.

    & Conformational stability and interplay of helical N- and C-terminal domains with implications on major ampullate spidroin assembly. Biomacromolecules 18, 835–845 (2017).

  135. 135.

    , , & pH-dependent dimerization and salt-dependent stabilization of the N-terminal domain of spider dragline silk — implications for fiber formation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 310–313 (2011).

  136. 136.

    et al. Sequential pH-driven dimerization and stabilization of the N-terminal domain enables rapid spider silk formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3254 (2014).

  137. 137.

    & Unraveling a trap-and-trigger mechanism in the pH-sensitive self-assembly of spider silk proteins. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 658–662 (2012).

  138. 138.

    , & Dimerization of terminal domains in spiders silk proteins is controlled by electrostatic anisotropy and modulated by hydrophobic patches. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 1, 363–371 (2015).

  139. 139.

    , & Effect of sodium chloride on the structure and stability of spider silk's N-terminal protein domain. Biomater. Sci. 1, 276–284 (2013).

  140. 140.

    , , & Electrostatics analysis of the mutational and pH effects of the N-terminal domain self-association of the major ampullate spidroin. Soft Matter 12, 5600–5612 (2016).

  141. 141.

    et al. Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 8, 1695–1701 (2007).

  142. 142.

    et al. Structural properties of recombinant nonrepetitive and repetitive parts of major ampullate spidroin 1 from Euprosthenops australis : implications for fiber formation. Biochemistry 47, 3407–3417 (2008).

  143. 143.

    , & Influence of repeat numbers on self-assembly rates of repetitive recombinant spider silk proteins. J. Struct. Biol. 186, 431–437 (2014).

  144. 144.

    & Dimerization of conserved N-terminal domain of a spider silk protein controls the self-assembly of the repetitive core domain. Biomacromolecules 18, 2521–2528 (2017).

  145. 145.

    , , & Hyper-production of large proteins of spider dragline silk MaSp2 by Escherichia coli via synthetic biology approach. Process Biochem. 51, 484–490 (2016).

  146. 146.

    , , & Seed-specific expression of spider silk protein multimers causes long-term stability. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 6 (2016).

  147. 147.

    , , & Plant molecular farming: much more than medicines. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 9, 271–294 (2016).

  148. 148.

    , , & Production of spider silk proteins in tobacco and potato. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 573–577 (2001).

  149. 149.

    et al. Silkomics: insight into the silk spinning process of spiders. J. Proteome Res. 15, 1179–1193 (2016).

  150. 150.

    , & Silk spinning in silkworms and spiders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1290 (2016).

  151. 151.

    et al. Insights into silk formation process: correlation of mechanical properties and structural evolution during artificial spinning of silk fibers. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 1992–2000 (2016).

  152. 152.

    et al. Predicting silk fiber mechanical properties through multiscale simulation and protein design. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 1542–1556 (2017).

  153. 153.

    et al. Synergistic integration of experimental and simulation approaches for the de novo design of silk-based materials. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 866–876 (2017).

  154. 154.

    et al. Silk–its mysteries, how it is made, and how it is used. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 1, 864–876 (2015).

  155. 155.

    et al. Sequence-structure-property relationships of recombinant spider silk proteins: integration of biopolymer design, processing, and modeling. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 241–253 (2013).

  156. 156.

    , , , & Structure-function-property-design interplay in biopolymers: spider silk. Acta Biomater. 10, 1612–1626 (2014).

  157. 157.

    , & Structural biological materials: critical mechanics-materials connections. Science 339, 773–779 (2013).

  158. 158.

    , , , & Extreme diversity, conservation, and convergence of spider silk fibroin sequences. Science 291, 2603–2605 (2001).

  159. 159.

    et al. pH-dependent dimerization of spider silk N-terminal domain requires relocation of a wedged Tryptophan side chain. J. Mol. Biol. 422, 477–487 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

J.L.Y. acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation (NSF DMR 1264801) and US Department of Defence Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-17-1-0282). A.v.d.V. acknowledges support from the US National Science Foundation (NSF CHE-1531590).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

    • Jeffery L. Yarger
  2. Magnetic Resonance Research Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

    • Jeffery L. Yarger
    •  & Brian R. Cherry
  3. Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.

    • Arjan van der Vaart

Authors

  1. Search for Jeffery L. Yarger in:

  2. Search for Brian R. Cherry in:

  3. Search for Arjan van der Vaart in:

Contributions

The manuscript was researched and written with contributions from all three authors. J.L.Y. wrote the introduction and is responsible for much of the experimental sections of the review. A.v.d.V. researched and wrote the computational section of the review. B.R.C. researched and wrote the section on mechanical testing and several parts of the experimental sections.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffery L. Yarger.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2018.8