Nanodiagnostics as a field makes use of fundamental advances in nanobiotechnology to diagnose, characterize and manage disease at the molecular scale. As these strategies move closer to routine clinical use, a proper understanding of different imaging modalities, relevant biological systems and physical properties governing nanoscale interactions is necessary to rationally engineer next-generation bionanomaterials. In this Review, we analyse the background physics of several clinically relevant imaging modalities and their associated sensitivity and specificity, provide an overview of the materials currently used for in vivo nanodiagnostics, and assess the progress made towards clinical translation. This work provides a framework for understanding both the impressive progress made thus far in the nanodiagnostics field as well as presenting challenges that must be overcome to obtain widespread clinical adoption.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Open Access articles citing this article.
Cancer Nanotechnology Open Access 24 May 2022
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Open Access 19 May 2022
Journal of Nanobiotechnology Open Access 06 September 2021
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Cairns, J. The treatment of diseases and the war against cancer. Sci. Am. 253, 51–59 (1985).
Nestor, P. J., Scheltens, P. & Hodges, J. R. Advances in the early detection of Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Med. 10 (Suppl.), S34–S41 (2004).
Greish, K. Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting. Methods Mol. Biol. 624, 25–37 (2010).
Lee, D. E. et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles for multimodal imaging and theragnosis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 2656–2672 (2012).
Anker, J. N. et al. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nat. Mater. 7, 442–453 (2008).
Jokerst, J. V. & Gambhir, S. S. Molecular imaging with theranostic nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 1050–1060 (2011).
Park, S. M., Sabour, A. F., Son, J. H., Lee, S. H. & Lee, L. P. Toward integrated molecular diagnostic system (i MDx): principles and applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 61, 1506–1521 (2014).
Waldrop, M. M. The chips are down for Moore's law. Nature 530, 144–147 (2016).
Jain, K. K. Applications of nanobiotechnology in clinical diagnostics. Clin. Chem. 53, 2002–2009 (2007).
Jain, K. K. Nanotechnology in clinical laboratory diagnostics. Clin. Chim. Acta 358, 37–54 (2005).
Picard, J. D. History of mammography. Bull. Acad. Natl Med. 182, 1613–1620 (in French) (1998).
Burghardt, A. J., Link, T. M. & Majumdar, S. High-resolution computed tomography for clinical imaging of bone microarchitecture. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469, 2179–2193 (2011).
Wokrina, T. et al. High-resolution murine brain imaging at 15.2 Tesla. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. Abstr. 20, 3233 (2012).
King, J. P. et al. Room-temperature in situ nuclear spin hyperpolarization from optically pumped nitrogen vacancy centres in diamond. Nat. Commun. 6, 8965 (2015).
Hersman, F. W. et al. Large production system for hyperpolarized 129Xe for human lung imaging studies. Acad. Radiol. 15, 683–692 (2008).
Kirby, M. et al. Hyperpolarized 3He and 129Xe MR imaging in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Radiology 265, 600–610 (2012).
Nikiel-Osuchowska, A. et al. Metastability exchange optical pumping of 3He gas up to hundreds of millibars at 4.7 Tesla. Eur. Phys. J. D 67, 1–29 (2013).
Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J. H. et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of >10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 10158–10163 (2003).
Natterer, J. & Bargon, J. Parahydrogen induced polarization. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 31, 293–315 (1997).
James, M. L. & Gambhir, S. S. A molecular imaging primer: modalities, imaging agents, and applications. Physiol. Rev. 92, 897–965 (2012).
Sarder, P., Maji, D. & Achilefu, S. Molecular probes for fluorescence lifetime imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 26, 963–974 (2015).
Zavaleta, C. L. et al. Multiplexed imaging of surface enhanced Raman scattering nanotags in living mice using noninvasive Raman spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13511–13516 (2009).
Zavaleta, C. L. et al. A Raman-based endoscopic strategy for multiplexed molecular imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2288–2297 (2013).
Garai, E. et al. A real-time clinical endoscopic system for intraluminal, multiplexed imaging of surface-enhanced Raman scattering nanoparticles. PLoS ONE 10, e0123185 (2015).
de la Zerda, A. et al. Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 557–562 (2008).
de la Zerda, A. et al. Ultrahigh sensitivity carbon nanotube agents for photoacoustic molecular imaging in living mice. Nano Lett. 10, 2168–2172 (2010).
Antaris, A. L. et al. A small-molecule dye for NIR-II imaging. Nat. Mater. 15, 235–242 (2016).
Thakor, A. S. & Gambhir, S. S. Nanooncology: the future of cancer diagnosis and therapy. CA Cancer J. Clin. 63, 395–418 (2013).
Zhuang, H. & Codreanu, I. Growing applications of FDG PET-CT imaging in non-oncologic conditions. J. Biomed. Res. 29, 189–202 (2015).
Gowrishankar, G. et al. Investigation of 6-[18F]-fluoromaltose as a novel PET tracer for imaging bacterial infection. PLoS ONE 9, e107951 (2014).
Molton, J. S., Leek, F. A., Ng, L. H., Totman, J. J. & Paton, N. I. A. Novel approach to CT, MR, and PET examination of patients with infections requiring stringent airborne precautions. Radiology 278, 881–887 (2016).
Wang, Y. et al. Evaluating the pharmacokinetics and in vivo cancer targeting capability of Au nanocages by positron emission tomography imaging. ACS Nano 6, 5880–5888 (2012).
Wang, W. et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of hypoxia 18F-fluoromisonidazole dynamic PET in head and neck cancer. J. Nucl. Med. 51, 37–45 (2010).
Chaudhry, A. A. et al. Utility of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging in musculoskeletal imaging. World J. Radiol. 8, 268–274 (2016).
Haywood, T. et al. Carbon-11 radiolabelling of organosulfur compounds: 11C synthesis of the progesterone receptor agonist tanaproget. Chemistry 21, 9034–9038 (2015).
Gambhir, S. S. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 683–693 (2002).
Cherry, S. R. & Dahlbom, M. in PET: Physics, Instrumentation, and Scanners (ed. Phelps, M. E. ) 1–117 (Springer, 2006).
Rahmim, A. & Zaidi, H. PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges. Nucl. Med. Commun. 29, 193–207 (2008).
de Swart, J. et al. Utilizing high-energy γ-photons for high-resolution 213Bi SPECT in mice. J. Nucl. Med. 57, 486–492 (2015).
Goorden, M. C. et al. VECTor: a preclinical imaging system for simultaneous submillimeter SPECT and PET. J. Nucl. Med. 54, 306–312 (2013).
Pysz, M. A., Gambhir, S. S. & Willmann, J. K. Molecular imaging: current status and emerging strategies. Clin. Radiol. 65, 500–516 (2010).
Runge, V. M. et al. The use of Gd DTPA as a perfusion agent and marker of blood-brain barrier disruption. Magn. Reson. Imaging 3, 43–55 (1985).
Gramiak, R. & Shah, P. M. Echocardiography of the aortic root. Invest. Radiol. 3, 356–366 (1968).
Bachawal, S. V. et al. Earlier detection of breast cancer with ultrasound molecular imaging in a transgenic mouse model. Cancer Res. 73, 1689–1698 (2013).
Deshpande, N., Needles, A. & Willmann, J. K. Molecular ultrasound imaging: current status and future directions. Clin. Radiol. 65, 567–581 (2010).
Pysz, M. A. & Willmann, J. K. Targeted contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an emerging technology in abdominal and pelvic imaging. Gastroenterology 140, 785–790 (2011).
Blanco, E., Shen, H. & Ferrari, M. Principles of nanoparticle design for overcoming biological barriers to drug delivery. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 941–951 (2015).
Smith, B. R. & Gambhir, S. S. Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging. Chem. Rev. 117, 901–986 (2017).
Lee, H. et al. An endoscope with integrated transparent bioelectronics and theranostic nanoparticles for colon cancer treatment. Nat. Commun. 6, 10059 (2015).
Magaye, R., Zhao, J., Bowman, L. & Ding, M. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of cobalt-, nickel- and copper-based nanoparticles. Exp. Ther. Med. 4, 551–561 (2012).
Kim, B. H. et al. Large-scale synthesis of uniform and extremely small-sized iron oxide nanoparticles for high-resolution T1 magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 12624–12631 (2011).
Ling, D., Lee, N. & Hyeon, T. Chemical synthesis and assembly of uniformly sized iron oxide nanoparticles for medical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1276–1285 (2015).
Hainfeld, J. F., Slatkin, D. N., Focella, T. M. & Smilowitz, H. M. Gold nanoparticles: a new X-ray contrast agent. Br. J. Radiol. 79, 248–253 (2006).
Jackson, P. A., Rahman, W. N., Wong, C. J., Ackerly, T. & Geso, M. Potential dependent superiority of gold nanoparticles in comparison to iodinated contrast agents. Eur. J. Radiol. 75, 104–109 (2010).
Yang, X., Yang, M., Pang, B., Vara, M. & Xia, Y. Gold nanomaterials at work in biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 115, 10410–10488 (2015).
Ferreira, M. F. et al. Gold nanoparticles functionalised with stable, fast water exchanging Gd3+ chelates as high relaxivity contrast agents for MRI. Dalton Trans. 41, 5472–5475 (2012).
Alric, C. et al. Gadolinium chelate coated gold nanoparticles as contrast agents for both X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5908–5915 (2008).
Zhao, Y. et al. Copper-64-alloyed gold nanoparticles for cancer imaging: improved radiolabel stability and diagnostic accuracy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 156–159 (2014).
Zhao, Y., Sultan, D., Detering, L., Luehmann, H. & Liu, Y. Facile synthesis, pharmacokinetic and systemic clearance evaluation, and positron emission tomography cancer imaging of 64Cu–Au alloy nanoclusters. Nanoscale 6, 13501–13509 (2014).
Kircher, M. F. et al. A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI–photoacoustic–Raman nanoparticle. Nat. Med. 18, 829–834 (2012).
Moriggi, L. et al. Gold nanoparticles functionalized with gadolinium chelates as high-relaxivity MRI contrast agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 10828–10829 (2009).
Wang, Y. et al. Radioluminescent gold nanocages with controlled radioactivity for real-time in vivo imaging. Nano Lett. 13, 581–585 (2013).
Qian, X. et al. In vivo tumor targeting and spectroscopic detection with surface-enhanced Raman nanoparticle tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 83–90 (2008).
Lee, K., Cui, Y., Lee, L. P. & Irudayaraj, J. Quantitative imaging of single mRNA splice variants in living cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 474–480 (2014).
Park, S. M., Huh, Y. S., Craighead, H. G. & Erickson, D. A method for nanofluidic device prototyping using elastomeric collapse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15549–15554 (2009).
Michalet, X. et al. Quantum dots for live cells. in vivo imaging, and diagnostics. Science 307, 538–544 (2005).
Kairdolf, B. A. et al. Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 6, 143–162 (2013).
Gao, X., Cui, Y., Levenson, R. M., Chung, L. W. & Nie, S. In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 969–976 (2004).
Stroh, M. et al. Quantum dots spectrally distinguish multiple species within the tumor milieu in vivo. Nat. Med. 11, 678–682 (2005).
Alivisatos, A. P. Semiconductor clusters, nanocrystals, and quantum dots. Science 271, 933 (1996).
Chen, O. et al. Compact high-quality CdSe–CdS core–shell nanocrystals with narrow emission linewidths and suppressed blinking. Nat. Mater. 12, 445–451 (2013).
Han, H. S. et al. Quantum dot/antibody conjugates for in vivo cytometric imaging in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1350–1355 (2015).
Medintz, I. L., Uyeda, H. T., Goldman, E. R. & Mattoussi, H. Quantum dot bioconjugates for imaging, labelling and sensing. Nat. Mater. 4, 435–446 (2005).
Lemon, C. M. et al. Micelle-encapsulated quantum dot-porphyrin assemblies as in vivo two-photon oxygen sensors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 9832–9842 (2015).
Pons, T. et al. Cadmium-free CuInS2/ZnS quantum dots for sentinel lymph node imaging with reduced toxicity. ACS Nano 4, 2531–2538 (2010).
Gu, Y. P., Cui, R., Zhang, Z. L., Xie, Z. X. & Pang, D. W. Ultrasmall near-infrared Ag2Se quantum dots with tunable fluorescence for in vivo imaging. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 79–82 (2012).
Yu, J. H. et al. High-resolution three-photon biomedical imaging using doped ZnS nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 12, 359–366 (2013).
Park, J. H. et al. Biodegradable luminescent porous silicon nanoparticles for in vivo applications. Nat. Mater. 8, 331–336 (2009).
Torchilin, V. P. PEG-based micelles as carriers of contrast agents for different imaging modalities. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, 235–252 (2002).
Petersen, A. L., Hansen, A. E., Gabizon, A. & Andresen, T. L. Liposome imaging agents in personalized medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 1417–1435 (2012).
Gong, H., Peng, R. & Liu, Z. Carbon nanotubes for biomedical imaging: the recent advances. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65, 1951–1963 (2013).
Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G., Saito, R. & Jorio, A. Raman spectroscopy of carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rep. 409, 47–99 (2005).
Smith, B. R. et al. Selective uptake of single-walled carbon nanotubes by circulating monocytes for enhanced tumour delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 481–487 (2014).
Wu, L. et al. A green synthesis of carbon nanoparticle from honey for real-time photoacoustic imaging. Nano Res. 6, 312–325 (2013).
Bertrand, N., Wu, J., Xu, X., Kamaly, N. & Farokhzad, O. C. Cancer nanotechnology: the impact of passive and active targeting in the era of modern cancer biology. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 66, 2–25 (2014).
Hong, S. et al. The binding avidity of a nanoparticle-based multivalent targeted drug delivery platform. Chem. Biol. 14, 107–115 (2007).
Sykes, E. A., Chen, J., Zheng, G. & Chan, W. C. Investigating the impact of nanoparticle size on active and passive tumor targeting efficiency. ACS Nano 8, 5696–5706 (2014).
Park, S. M. et al. Selection and elution of aptamers using nanoporous sol-gel arrays with integrated microheaters. Lab. Chip 9, 1206–1212 (2009).
Bae, Y. H. & Park, K. Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. J. Controlled Release 153, 198–205 (2011).
Chouly, C., Pouliquen, D., Lucet, I., Jeune, J. J. & Jallet, P. Development of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for MRI: effect of particle size, charge and surface nature on biodistribution. J. Microencapsul. 13, 245–255 (1996).
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K. & Farokhzad, O. C. Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol. Pharm. 5, 505–515 (2008).
Venturoli, D. & Rippe, B. Ficoll and dextran vs. globular proteins as probes for testing glomerular permselectivity: effects of molecular size, shape, charge, and deformability. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol. 288, F605–613 (2005).
Vinogradov, S. V., Bronich, T. K. & Kabanov, A. V. Nanosized cationic hydrogels for drug delivery: preparation, properties and interactions with cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, 135–147 (2002).
Moghimi, S. M., Hunter, A. C. & Murray, J. C. Long-circulating and target-specific nanoparticles: theory to practice. Pharmacol. Rev. 53, 283–318 (2001).
Chen, L. T. & Weiss, L. The role of the sinus wall in the passage of erythrocytes through the spleen. Blood 41, 529–537 (1973).
Moghimi, S. M., Porter, C. J., Muir, I. S., Illum, L. & Davis, S. S. Non-phagocytic uptake of intravenously injected microspheres in rat spleen: influence of particle size and hydrophilic coating. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 861–866 (1991).
He, C., Hu, Y., Yin, L., Tang, C. & Yin, C. Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31, 3657–3666 (2010).
Patel, H. M. & Moghimi, S. M. Serum-mediated recognition of liposomes by phagocytic cells of the reticuloendothelial system — the concept of tissue specificity. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 32, 45–60 (1998).
Moore, A., Weissleder, R. & Bogdanov, A. Jr. Uptake of dextran-coated monocrystalline iron oxides in tumor cells and macrophages. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 7, 1140–1145 (1997).
Bakhtiary, Z. et al. Targeted superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for early detection of cancer: possibilities and challenges. Nanomedicine 12, 287–307 (2015).
Mirshafiee, V., Kim, R., Park, S., Mahmoudi, M. & Kraft, M. L. Impact of protein pre-coating on the protein corona composition and nanoparticle cellular uptake. Biomaterials 75, 295–304 (2016).
Mahmoudi, M. et al. Variation of protein corona composition of gold nanoparticles following plasmonic heating. Nano Lett. 14, 6–12 (2014).
Fang, C. et al. In vivo tumor targeting of tumor necrosis factor-α-loaded stealth nanoparticles: effect of MePEG molecular weight and particle size. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 27, 27–36 (2006).
Bergstrom, K. et al. Effects of branching and molecular weight of surface-bound poly(ethylene oxide) on protein rejection. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 6, 123–132 (1994).
Perry, J. L. et al. PEGylated PRINT nanoparticles: the impact of PEG density on protein binding, macrophage association, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics. Nano Lett. 12, 5304–5310 (2012).
Larsen, E. K. et al. Accumulation of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with variably sized polyethylene glycol in murine tumors. Nanoscale 4, 2352–2361 (2012).
Cole, A. J. et al. Polyethylene glycol modified, cross-linked starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles for enhanced magnetic tumor targeting. Biomaterials 32, 2183–2193 (2011).
McDonald, D. M. & Baluk, P. Significance of blood vessel leakiness in cancer. Cancer Res. 62, 5381–5385 (2002).
Yuan, F. et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. Cancer Res. 55, 3752–3756 (1995).
Fang, J., Nakamura, H. & Maeda, H. The EPR effect: unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63, 136–151 (2011).
Champion, J. A. & Mitragotri, S. Role of target geometry in phagocytosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 4930–4934 (2006).
Gratton, S. E. et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11613–11618 (2008).
Bartneck, M. et al. Rapid uptake of gold nanorods by primary human blood phagocytes and immunomodulatory effects of surface chemistry. ACS Nano 4, 3073–3086 (2010).
Arnida, Janát-Amsbury, M. M., Ray, A., Peterson, C. M. & Ghandehari, H. Geometry and surface characteristics of gold nanoparticles influence their biodistribution and uptake by macrophages. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 77, 417–423 (2011).
Geng, Y. et al. Shape effects of filaments versus spherical particles in flow and drug delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 249–255 (2007).
Cho, E. C. et al. Measuring the optical absorption cross-sections of Au–Ag nanocages and au nanorods by photoacoustic imaging. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 9023–9028 (2009).
Hu, M. et al. Gold nanostructures: engineering their plasmonic properties for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 1084–1094 (2006).
Huang, J., Zhong, X., Wang, L., Yang, L. & Mao, H. Improving the magnetic resonance imaging contrast and detection methods with engineered magnetic nanoparticles. Theranostics 2, 86–102 (2012).
Ehlerding, E. B., Chen, F. & Cai, W. Biodegradable and renal clearable inorganic nanoparticles. Adv. Sci. 3, 1500223 (2016).
Thakor, A. S. et al. The fate and toxicity of Raman-active silica-gold nanoparticles in mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 79ra33 (2011).
Hauck, T. S., Anderson, R. E., Fischer, H. C., Newbigging, S. & Chan, W. C. In vivo quantum-dot toxicity assessment. Small 6, 138–144 (2010).
Sosnovik, D. E., Nahrendorf, M. & Weissleder, R. Magnetic nanoparticles for MR imaging: agents, techniques and cardiovascular applications. Basic Res. Cardiol. 103, 122–130 (2008).
Ballou, B. et al. Sentinel lymph node imaging using quantum dots in mouse tumor models. Bioconjug. Chem. 18, 389–396 (2007).
Weissleder, R. et al. Superparamagnetic iron oxide: pharmacokinetics and toxicity. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 152, 167–173 (1989).
Ferrucci, J. & Stark, D. Iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of the liver and spleen: review of the first 5 years. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 155, 943–950 (1990).
Alkilany, A. M. & Murphy, C. J. Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far? J. Nanopart. Res. 12, 2313–2333 (2010).
Brown, C. L., Whitehouse, M. W., Tiekink, E. R. & Bushell, G. R. Colloidal metallic gold is not bio-inert. Inflammopharmacology 16, 133–137 (2008).
Chen, Y. S., Hung, Y. C., Liau, I. & Huang, G. S. Assessment of the in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 4, 858–864 (2009).
Alkilany, A. M. et al. Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small 5, 701–708 (2009).
Walling, M. A., Novak, J. A. & Shepard, J. R. Quantum dots for live cell and in vivo imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 10, 441–491 (2009).
Hardman, R. A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 114, 165–172 (2006).
Choi, H. S. & Frangioni, J. V. Nanoparticles for biomedical imaging: fundamentals of clinical translation. Mol. Imag. 9, 291–310 (2010).
Choi, H. S. et al. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1165–1170 (2007).
Jokerst, J. V., Lobovkina, T., Zare, R. N. & Gambhir, S. S. Nanoparticle PEGylation for imaging and therapy. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 6, 715–728 (2011).
Pelaz, B. et al. Surface functionalization of nanoparticles with polyethylene glycol: effects on protein adsorption and cellular uptake. ACS Nano 9, 6996–7008 (2015).
Hamad, I. et al. Distinct polymer architecture mediates switching of complement activation pathways at the nanosphere–serum interface: implications for stealth nanoparticle engineering. ACS Nano 4, 6629–6638 (2010).
Moyano, D. F. et al. Fabrication of corona-free nanoparticles with tunable hydrophobicity. ACS Nano 8, 6748–6755 (2014).
Safavi-Sohi, R. et al. Bypassing protein corona issue on active targeting: zwitterionic coatings dictate specific interactions of targeting moieties and cell receptors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 22808–22818 (2016).
Hajipour, M. J., Laurent, S., Aghaie, A., Rezaee, F. & Mahmoudi, M. Personalized protein coronas: a ‘key’ factor at the nanobiointerface. Biomater. Sci. 2, 1210–1221 (2014).
Hajipour, M. J. et al. Personalized disease-specific protein corona influences the therapeutic impact of graphene oxide. Nanoscale 7, 8978–8994 (2015).
Ren, H. et al. A biocompatible condensation reaction for the labeling of terminal cysteine residues on proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9658–9662 (2009).
Liang, G., Ren, H. & Rao, J. A biocompatible condensation reaction for controlled assembly of nanostructures in living cells. Nat. Chem. 2, 54–60 (2010).
Dragulescu-Andrasi, A., Kothapalli, S. R., Tikhomirov, G. A., Rao, J. & Gambhir, S. S. Activatable oligomerizable imaging agents for photoacoustic imaging of furin-like activity in living subjects. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11015–11022 (2013).
Shen, B. et al. Positron emission tomography imaging of drug-induced tumor apoptosis with a caspase-triggered nanoaggregation probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10511–10514 (2013).
Ye, D. et al. Bioorthogonal cyclization-mediated in situ self-assembly of small-molecule probes for imaging caspase activity in vivo. Nat. Chem. 6, 519–526 (2014).
Ye, D. et al. Caspase-responsive smart gadolinium-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of drug-induced apoptosis. Chem. Sci. 4, 3845–3852 (2014).
Soppimath, K. S., Aminabhavi, T. M., Kulkarni, A. R. & Rudzinski, W. E. Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles as drug delivery devices. J. Controlled Release 70, 1–20 (2001).
Foroutan, F. et al. Sol–gel synthesis and electrospraying of biodegradable (P2O5)55–(CaO)30–(Na2O)15 glass nanospheres as a transient contrast agent for ultrasound stem cell imaging. ACS Nano 9, 1868–1877 (2015).
Kempen, P. J. et al. Theranostic mesoporous silica nanoparticles biodegrade after pro-survival drug delivery and ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging of stem cells. Theranostics 5, 631–642 (2015).
Nune, S. K. et al. Nanoparticles for biomedical imaging. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 6, 1175–1194 (2009).
Bashir, M. R., Bhatti, L., Marin, D. & Nelson, R. C. Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 41, 884–898 (2015).
Bellin, M. F. et al. Liver metastases: safety and efficacy of detection with superparamagnetic iron oxide in MR imaging. Radiology 193, 657–663 (1994).
Denys, A. et al. Hepatic tumors: detection and characterization at 1-T MR imaging enhanced with AMI-25. Radiology 193, 665–669 (1994).
Reimer, P. & Tombach, B. Hepatic MRI with SPIO: detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. Eur. Radiol. 8, 1198–1204 (1998).
Semelka, R. C. & Helmberger, T. K. Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 218, 27–38 (2001).
Ross, R. W. et al. Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (LNMRI) identifies occult lymph node metastases in prostate cancer patients prior to salvage radiation therapy. Clin. Imaging 33, 301–305 (2009).
Kim, Y. K. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: comparison of SPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 16-detector row CT. Radiology 238, 531–541 (2006).
Harisinghani, M. G. et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 2491–2499 (2003).
Mack, M. G., Balzer, J. O., Straub, R., Eichler, K. & Vogl, T. J. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. Radiology 222, 239–244 (2002).
Guimaraes, A. R. et al. Pilot study evaluating use of lymphotrophic nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for assessing lymph nodes in renal cell cancer. Urology 71, 708–712 (2008).
Harisinghani, M. G. & Weissleder, R. Sensitive, noninvasive detection of lymph node metastases. PLoS Med. 1, e66 (2004).
Klerkx, W. M. et al. Detection of lymph node metastases by gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 244–253 (2010).
Wunderbaldinger, P., Josephson, L., Bremer, C., Moore, A. & Weissleder, R. Detection of lymph node metastases by contrast-enhanced MRI in an experimental model. Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 292–297 (2002).
Mouli, S. K., Zhao, L. C., Omary, R. A. & Thaxton, C. S. Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors. Nat. Rev. Urol. 7, 84–93 (2010).
Benezra, M. et al. Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2768–2780 (2011).
Bradbury, M. S. et al. Clinically-translated silica nanoparticles as dual-modality cancer-targeted probes for image-guided surgery and interventions. Integr. Biol. 5, 74–86 (2013).
Phillips, E. et al. Clinical translation of an ultrasmall inorganic optical-PET imaging nanoparticle probe. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 260ra149 (2014).
Schulz, C. & Massberg, S. Atherosclerosis — multiple pathways to lesional macrophages. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 239ps2 (2014).
Mulder, W. J., Jaffer, F. A., Fayad, Z. A. & Nahrendorf, M. Imaging and nanomedicine in inflammatory atherosclerosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 6, 239sr1 (2014).
Sanz, J. & Fayad, Z. A. Imaging of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nature 451, 953–957 (2008).
Kratz, J. D., Chaddha, A., Bhattacharjee, S. & Goonewardena, S. N. Atherosclerosis and nanotechnology: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 30, 33–39 (2016).
Nahrendorf, M. et al. Nanoparticle PET-CT imaging of macrophages in inflammatory atherosclerosis. Circulation 117, 379–387 (2008).
Danad, I., Fayad, Z. A., Willemink, M. J. & Min, J. K. New applications of cardiac computed tomography: dual-energy, spectral, and molecular CT imaging. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 8, 710–723 (2015).
Toussaint, J. F., LaMuraglia, G. M., Southern, J. F., Fuster, V. & Kantor, H. L. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation 94, 932–938 (1996).
Kooi, M. E. et al. Accumulation of ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in human atherosclerotic plaques can be detected by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 107, 2453–2458 (2003).
Tang, T. Y. et al. The ATHEROMA (Atorvastatin Therapy: Effects on Reduction of Macrophage Activity) study: evaluation using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in carotid disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53, 2039–2050 (2009).
Weissleder, R., Nahrendorf, M. & Pittet, M. J. Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 13, 125–138 (2014).
Nahrendorf, M., Pittet, M. J. & Swirski, F. K. Monocytes: protagonists of infarct inflammation and repair after myocardial infarction. Circulation 121, 2437–2445 (2010).
Alam, S. R. et al. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide in patients with acute myocardial infarction: early clinical experience. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 5, 559–565 (2012).
Naresh, N. K. et al. Monocyte and/or macrophage infiltration of heart after myocardial infarction: MR imaging by using T1-shortening liposomes. Radiology 264, 428–435 (2012).
Yilmaz, A. et al. Imaging of myocardial infarction using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: a human study using a multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging approach. Eur. Heart J. 34, 462–475 (2013).
Yilmaz, A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of inflamed myocardium using iron oxide nanoparticles in patients with acute myocardial infarction — preliminary results. Int. J. Cardiol. 163, 175–182 (2013).
Moon, H. et al. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial inflammation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Circulation 125, 2603–2612 (2012).
Wu, Y. L. et al. Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac allograft rejection by cellular and functional cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2, 731–741 (2009).
Christen, T. et al. Molecular imaging of innate immune cell function in transplant rejection. Circulation 119, 1925–1932 (2009).
Gaglia, J. L. et al. Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic islet inflammation in type 1A diabetes patients. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 442–445 (2011).
Turvey, S. E. et al. Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic inflammation and its reversal in type 1 diabetes. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 2454–2461 (2005).
Denis, M. C., Mahmood, U., Benoist, C., Mathis, D. & Weissleder, R. Imaging inflammation of the pancreatic islets in type 1 diabetes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12634–12639 (2004).
Gaglia, J. L. et al. Noninvasive mapping of pancreatic inflammation in recent-onset type-1 diabetes patients. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2139–2144 (2015).
Johnson, K. A., Fox, N. C., Sperling, R. A. & Klunk, W. E. Brain imaging in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a006213 (2012).
Cheng, K. K. et al. Curcumin-conjugated magnetic nanoparticles for detecting amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease mice using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Biomaterials 44, 155–172 (2015).
Viola, K. L. et al. Towards non-invasive diagnostic imaging of early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 91–98 (2015).
Jensen, S. A. et al. Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates as an RNAi-based therapy for glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 209ra152 (2013).
Seferos, D. S., Giljohann, D. A., Hill, H. D., Prigodich, A. E. & Mirkin, C. A. Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15477–15479 (2007).
Kwong, G. A. et al. Mass-encoded synthetic biomarkers for multiplexed urinary monitoring of disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 63–70 (2013).
Warren, A. D., Kwong, G. A., Wood, D. K., Lin, K. Y. & Bhatia, S. N. Point-of-care diagnostics for noncommunicable diseases using synthetic urinary biomarkers and paper microfluidics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3671–3676 (2014).
Ronald, J. A. et al. Development and validation of non-integrative, self-limited, and replicating minicircles for safe reporter gene imaging of cell-based therapies. PLoS ONE 8, e73138 (2013).
Ronald, J. A., Chuang, H. Y., Dragulescu-Andrasi, A., Hori, S. S. & Gambhir, S. S. Detecting cancers through tumor-activatable minicircles that lead to a detectable blood biomarker. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 3068–3073 (2015).
Lane, L. A., Qian, X., Smith, A. M. & Nie, S. Physical chemistry of nanomedicine: understanding the complex behaviors of nanoparticles in vivo. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 66, 521–547 (2015).
Ferguson, R. M., Khandhar, A. P. & Krishnan, K. M. Tracer design for magnetic particle imaging. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07318B (2012).
Huang, J. et al. Effects of nanoparticle size on cellular uptake and liver MRI with polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 4, 7151–7160 (2010).
Lee, N. et al. Magnetosome-like ferrimagnetic iron oxide nanocubes for highly sensitive MRI of single cells and transplanted pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 2662–2667 (2011).
Tsuji, M., Hashimoto, M., Nishizawa, Y., Kubokawa, M. & Tsuji, T. Microwave-assisted synthesis of metallic nanostructures in solution. Chem. Eur. J. 11, 440–452 (2005).
Chen, L. et al. High-yield seedless synthesis of triangular gold nanoplates through oxidative etching. Nano Lett. 14, 7201–7206 (2014).
Zheng, Y., Zhong, X., Li, Z. & Xia, Y. Successive, seed-mediated growth for the synthesis of single-crystal gold nanospheres with uniform diameters controlled in the range of 5–150 nm. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 31, 266–273 (2014).
Ye, X. et al. Improved size-tunable synthesis of monodisperse gold nanorods through the use of aromatic additives. ACS Nano 6, 2804–2817 (2012).
Manohar, N., Reynoso, F. J., Diagaradjane, P., Krishnan, S. & Cho, S. H. Quantitative imaging of gold nanoparticle distribution in a tumor-bearing mouse using benchtop X-ray fluorescence computed tomography. Sci. Rep. 6, 22079 (2016).
Warner, J. H., Young, N. P., Kirkland, A. I. & Briggs, G. A. D. Resolving strain in carbon nanotubes at the atomic level. Nat. Mater. 10, 958–962 (2011).
Wilhelm, S. et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16014 (2016).
Rice, W. L. et al. High resolution helium ion scanning microscopy of the rat kidney. PLoS ONE 8, e57051 (2013).
Young, B., O'Dowd, G. & Woodford, P. Wheater's Functional Histology 6th edn Ch.16 (Churchill Livingstone, 2014).
Sadauskas, E. et al. Kupffer cells are central in the removal of nanoparticles from the organism. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 4, 10 (2007).
Wisse, E., De Zanger, R. B., Charels, K., Van Der Smissen, P. & McCuskey, R. S. The liver sieve: considerations concerning the structure and function of endothelial fenestrae, the sinusoidal wall and the space of Disse. Hepatology 5, 683–692 (1985).
Seki, T., Fang, J. & Maeda, H. in Pharmaceutical Perspectives of Cancer Therapeutics (eds Lu, Y. & Mahato, R. L. ) 98 (Springer, 2009).
This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) Award U54CA151459 (Center for Cancer Nanotechnology Excellence and Translation). The authors thank the Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation, the Canary Foundation and the Sir Peter Michael Foundation for supporting their research. They thank H. Guo, G. Gold, E. Rosenthal, R. Barth, J. Wu, X. Qin, A. Iagaru, D.-h. Ha, J. Jokerst, B. R. Smith, T. Haywood, A. F. Sabour, E. Robinson and J. Schwimmer for their input.
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, Sm., Aalipour, A., Vermesh, O. et al. Towards clinically translatable in vivo nanodiagnostics. Nat Rev Mater 2, 17014 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.14
Cancer Nanotechnology (2022)
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2022)
Nature Materials (2022)
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2021)
Journal of Nanobiotechnology (2021)