Hydrogel delivery systems can leverage therapeutically beneficial outcomes of drug delivery and have found clinical use. Hydrogels can provide spatial and temporal control over the release of various therapeutic agents, including small-molecule drugs, macromolecular drugs and cells. Owing to their tunable physical properties, controllable degradability and capability to protect labile drugs from degradation, hydrogels serve as a platform on which various physiochemical interactions with the encapsulated drugs occur to control drug release. In this Review, we cover multiscale mechanisms underlying the design of hydrogel drug delivery systems, focusing on physical and chemical properties of the hydrogel network and the hydrogel–drug interactions across the network, mesh and molecular (or atomistic) scales. We discuss how different mechanisms interact and can be integrated to exert fine control in time and space over drug presentation. We also collect experimental release data from the literature, review clinical translation to date of these systems and present quantitative comparisons between different systems to provide guidelines for the rational design of hydrogel delivery systems.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $4.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Langer, R. Drug delivery and targeting. Nature 392, 5–10 (1998).
Hoare, T. R. & Kohane, D. S. Hydrogels in drug delivery: progress and challenges. Polymer 49, 1993–2007 (2008).
Liechty, W. B., Kryscio, D. R., Slaughter, B. V. & Peppas, N. A. Polymers for drug delivery systems. Ann. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 1, 149–173 (2010).
Cohen, J. IL-12 deaths: explanation and a puzzle. Science 270, 908 (1995).
Florence, A. T. & Jani, P. U. Novel oral drug formulations. Drug Safety 10, 233–266 (1994).
Ashley, G. W., Henise, J., Reid, R. & Santi, D. V. Hydrogel drug delivery system with predictable and tunable drug release and degradation rates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2318–2323 (2013). This study features cleavable covalent linkages with tunable half-lives over a wide range and demonstrates different drug release kinetics by orchestrating the rates of bulk erosion and linkage cleavage independently.
Tiwari, G. et al. Drug delivery systems: an updated review. Int. J. Pharm. Investig. 2, 2–11 (2012).
Tibbitt, M. W., Dahlman, J. E. & Langer, R. Emerging frontiers in drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 704–717 (2016).
Calvert, P. Hydrogels for soft machines. Adv. Mater. 21, 743–756 (2009).
Arakaki, K. et al. Artificial cartilage made from a novel double-network hydrogel: in vivo effects on the normal cartilage and ex vivo evaluation of the friction property. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 93A, 1160–1168 (2010).
Li, J., Illeperuma, W. R., Suo, Z. & Vlassak, J. J. Hybrid hydrogels with extremely high stiffness and toughness. ACS Macro Lett. 3, 520–523 (2014).
Bodugoz-Senturk, H., Macias, C. E., Kung, J. H. & Muratoglu, O. K. Poly(vinyl alcohol)–acrylamide hydrogels as load-bearing cartilage substitute. Biomaterials 30, 589–596 (2009).
Su, J., Hu, B.-H., Lowe, W. L., Kaufman, D. B. & Messersmith, P. B. Anti-inflammatory peptide-functionalized hydrogels for insulin-secreting cell encapsulation. Biomaterials 31, 308–314 (2010). This study demonstrates a synergy between adhesion ligands and cytokine-suppressive peptides, which improves viability of insulin-secreting cells in the presence of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Reichert, J. M. Trends in development and approval times for new therapeutics in the United States. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2, 695–702 (2003).
Leader, B., Baca, Q. J. & Golan, D. E. Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 21–39 (2008).
Khan, T. A. & Peh, K. K. & Ch'ng, H. S. Mechanical, bioadhesive strength and biological evaluations of chitosan films for wound dressing. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 3, 303–311 (2000).
Mahdavi, A. et al. A biodegradable and biocompatible gecko-inspired tissue adhesive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2307–2312 (2008).
Di, J. et al. Stretch-triggered drug delivery from wearable elastomer films containing therapeutic depots. ACS Nano 9, 9407–9415 (2015).
Bessa, P. C., Casal, M. & Reis, R. Bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue engineering: the road from laboratory to clinic, part II (BMP delivery). J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 2, 81–96 (2008).
Thorn, R., Greeman, J. & Austin, A. An in vitro study of antimicrobial activity and efficacy of iodine-generating hydrogel dressings. J. Wound Care 15, 305 (2006).
Momoh, F. U., Boateng, J. S., Richardson, S. C., Chowdhry, B. Z. & Mitchell, J. C. Development and functional characterization of alginate dressing as potential protein delivery system for wound healing. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 81, 137–150 (2015).
Pandit, A., Ashar, R. & Feldman, D. The effect of TGF-β delivered through a collagen scaffold on wound healing. J. Invest. Surg. 12, 89–100 (1999).
Jayakumar, R., Prabaharan, M., Kumar, P. S., Nair, S. & Tamura, H. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 29, 322–337 (2011).
Lee, K. Y. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 37, 106–126 (2012).
Tellechea, A. et al. Alginate and DNA gels are suitable delivery systems for diabetic wound healing. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds 14, 146–153 (2015).
Zhang, L., Chen, J. & Han, C. A multicenter clinical trial of recombinant human GM-CSF hydrogel for the treatment of deep second-degree burns. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 685–689 (2009).
Liu, W., Griffith, M. & Li, F. Alginate microsphere-collagen composite hydrogel for ocular drug delivery and implantation. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19, 3365–3371 (2008).
Dash, A. & Cudworth, G. Therapeutic applications of implantable drug delivery systems. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 40, 1–12 (1998).
Yu, L. & Ding, J. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1473–1481 (2008).
Silva, E. A. & Mooney, D. J. Spatiotemporal control of vascular endothelial growth factor delivery from injectable hydrogels enhances angiogenesis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 5, 590–598 (2007). This study demonstrates the ability of needle-injectable alginate hydrogels to regulate the temporal and spatial presentation of VEGF for the treatment of ischaemic diseases in a rodent model.
Silva, E. A., Kim, E.-S., Kong, H. J. & Mooney, D. J. Material-based deployment enhances efficacy of endothelial progenitor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14347–14352 (2008).
Hiemstra, C. et al. In vitro and in vivo protein delivery from in situ forming poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(lactide) hydrogels. J. Control. Release 119, 320–327 (2007).
Jin, R. et al. Synthesis and characterization of hyaluronic acid–poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels via Michael addition: an injectable biomaterial for cartilage repair. Acta Biomater. 6, 1968–1977 (2010).
Lim, D. W., Nettles, D. L., Setton, L. A. & Chilkoti, A. Rapid cross-linking of elastin-like polypeptides with (hydroxymethyl) phosphines in aqueous solution. Biomacromolecules 8, 1463–1470 (2007).
Wieduwild, R. et al. Minimal peptide motif for non-covalent peptide–heparin hydrogels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 2919–2922 (2013).
Kiick, K. L. Peptide-and protein-mediated assembly of heparinized hydrogels. Soft Matter 4, 29–37 (2008).
Ishii, S., Kaneko, J. & Nagasaki, Y. Development of a long-acting, protein-loaded, redox-active, injectable gel formed by a polyion complex for local protein therapeutics. Biomaterials 84, 210–218 (2016).
Desai, R. M., Koshy, S. T., Hilderbrand, S. A., Mooney, D. J. & Joshi, N. S. Versatile click alginate hydrogels crosslinked via tetrazine–norbornene chemistry. Biomaterials 50, 30–37 (2015).
Jewett, J. C. & Bertozzi, C. R. Cu-free click cycloaddition reactions in chemical biology. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 1272–1279 (2010).
DeForest, C. A. & Anseth, K. S. Cytocompatible click-based hydrogels with dynamically tunable properties through orthogonal photoconjugation and photocleavage reactions. Nat. Chem. 3, 925–931 (2011). This study demonstrates the synthesis of light-responsive hydrogels, which enable photoconjugation of peptides and cell encapsulation, using a combination of bio-orthogonal click chemistries and photoreactions.
Cao, Y. et al. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)–chitosan as thermosensitive in situ gel-forming system for ocular drug delivery. J. Control. Release 120, 186–194 (2007).
Mortensen, K. & Pedersen, J. S. Structural study on the micelle formation of poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(propylene oxide)-poly(ethylene oxide) triblock copolymer in aqueous solution. Macromolecules 26, 805–812 (1993).
Kwon, D. Y. et al. Synergistic anti-tumor activity through combinational intratumoral injection of an in-situ injectable drug depot. Biomaterials 85, 232–245 (2016).
Davidorf, F. H. et al. Ocular toxicity of vitreal pluronic polyol F-127. Retina 10, 297–300 (1990).
Censi, R. et al. Photopolymerized thermosensitive hydrogels for tailorable diffusion-controlled protein delivery. J. Control. Release 140, 230–236 (2009).
van de Wetering, P., Metters, A. T., Schoenmakers, R. G. & Hubbell, J. A. Poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels formed by conjugate addition with controllable swelling, degradation, and release of pharmaceutically active proteins. J. Control. Release 102, 619–627 (2005).
Guvendiren, M., Lu, H. D. & Burdick, J. A. Shear-thinning hydrogels for biomedical applications. Soft Matter 8, 260–272 (2012).
Altunbas, A., Lee, S. J., Rajasekaran, S. A., Schneider, J. P. & Pochan, D. J. Encapsulation of curcumin in self-assembling peptide hydrogels as injectable drug delivery vehicles. Biomaterials 32, 5906–5914 (2011).
Rajagopal, K. & Schneider, J. P. Self-assembling peptides and proteins for nanotechnological applications. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 14, 480–486 (2004).
Haines-Butterick, L. et al. Controlling hydrogelation kinetics by peptide design for three-dimensional encapsulation and injectable delivery of cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7791–7796 (2007).
Yan, C. et al. Injectable solid hydrogel: mechanism of shear-thinning and immediate recovery of injectable β-hairpin peptide hydrogels. Soft Matter 6, 5143–5156 (2010).
Haines-Butterick, L. A., Salick, D. A., Pochan, D. J. & Schneider, J. P. In vitro assessment of the pro-inflammatory potential of β-hairpin peptide hydrogels. Biomaterials 29, 4164–4169 (2008).
Micklitsch, C. M. et al. Zinc-triggered hydrogelation of a self-assembling β-hairpin peptide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 123, 1615–1617 (2011).
Rowan, S. J., Cantrill, S. J., Cousins, G. R., Sanders, J. K. & Stoddart, J. F. Dynamic covalent chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 898–952 (2002).
McKinnon, D. D., Domaille, D. W., Cha, J. N. & Anseth, K. S. Bis-aliphatic hydrazone-linked hydrogels form most rapidly at physiological pH: identifying the origin of hydrogel properties with small molecule kinetic studies. Chem. Mater. 26, 2382–2387 (2014).
Jin, Y., Yu, C., Denman, R. J. & Zhang, W. Recent advances in dynamic covalent chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 6634–6654 (2013).
Yesilyurt, V. et al. Injectable self-healing glucose-responsive hydrogels with pH-regulated mechanical properties. Adv. Mater. 28, 86–91 (2016).
Plieva, F. M., Galaev, I. Y., Noppe, W. & Mattiasson, B. Cryogel applications in microbiology. Trends Microbiol. 16, 543–551 (2008).
Sheridan, M., Shea, L., Peters, M. & Mooney, D. Bioabsorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering capable of sustained growth factor delivery. J. Control. Release 64, 91–102 (2000).
Zhou, S., Bismarck, A. & Steinke, J. H. Ion-responsive alginate based macroporous injectable hydrogel scaffolds prepared by emulsion templating. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 4736–4745 (2013).
Hassan, C. M. & Peppas, N. A. Structure and morphology of freeze/thawed PVA hydrogels. Macromolecules 33, 2472–2479 (2000).
Huebsch, N. et al. Matrix elasticity of void-forming hydrogels controls transplanted-stem-cell-mediated bone formation. Nat. Mater. 14, 1269–1277 (2015).
Bencherif, S. A. et al. Injectable preformed scaffolds with shape-memory properties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 19590–19595 (2012).
Bencherif, S. A. et al. Injectable cryogel-based whole-cell cancer vaccines. Nat. Commun. 6, 7556 (2015).
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K. & Farokhzad, O. C. Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol. Pharm. 5, 505–515 (2008).
Mitragotri, S. & Lahann, J. Physical approaches to biomaterial design. Nat. Mater. 8, 15–23 (2009).
Euliss, L. E., DuPont, J. A., Gratton, S. & DeSimone, J. Imparting size, shape, and composition control of materials for nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 35, 1095–1104 (2006).
Gratton, S. E. et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11613–11618 (2008).
Merkel, T. J. et al. The effect of particle size on the biodistribution of low-modulus hydrogel PRINT particles. J. Control. Release 162, 37–44 (2012).
Ginn, S. L., Alexander, I. E., Edelstein, M. L., Abedi, M. R. & Wixon, J. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2012 – an update. J. Gene Med. 15, 65–77 (2013).
Peer, D. et al. Nanocarriers as an emerging platform for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 751–760 (2007).
Vinogradov, S. V., Bronich, T. K. & Kabanov, A. V. Nanosized cationic hydrogels for drug delivery: preparation, properties and interactions with cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54, 135–147 (2002).
Vicent, M. J. & Duncan, R. Polymer conjugates: nanosized medicines for treating cancer. Trends Biotechnol. 24, 39–47 (2006).
Li, J. et al. Self-assembly of DNA nanohydrogels with controllable size and stimuli-responsive property for targeted gene regulation therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 1412–1415 (2015). A modular design of DNA nanogels for gene therapy was presented that can incorporate different functional elements to target specific cells and release therapeutic genes inside cells.
Oh, J. K., Drumright, R., Siegwart, D. J. & Matyjaszewski, K. The development of microgels/nanogels for drug delivery applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33, 448–477 (2008).
Rolland, J. P. et al. Direct fabrication and harvesting of monodisperse, shape-specific nanobiomaterials. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 10096–10100 (2005). This study presents a versatile top-down technique for the fabrication of nanogels and microgels, which provides fine control over particle size and shape, and is compatible with various therapeutic agents.
Perry, J. L. et al. PEGylated PRINT nanoparticles: the impact of PEG density on protein binding, macrophage association, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics. Nano Lett. 12, 5304–5310 (2012).
Dunn, S. S. et al. Reductively responsive siRNA-conjugated hydrogel nanoparticles for gene silencing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 7423–7430 (2012).
Peppas, N. A. & Sahlin, J. J. Hydrogels as mucoadhesive and bioadhesive materials: a review. Biomaterials 17, 1553–1561 (1996).
Chaturvedi, M., Kumar, M. & Pathak, K. A review on mucoadhesive polymer used in nasal drug delivery system. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2, 215 (2011).
Reece, T. B., Maxey, T. S. & Kron, I. L. A prospectus on tissue adhesives. Am. J. Surg. 182, S40–S44 (2001).
Xu, J., Strandman, S., Zhu, J. X., Barralet, J. & Cerruti, M. Genipin-crosslinked catechol-chitosan mucoadhesive hydrogels for buccal drug delivery. Biomaterials 37, 395–404 (2015).
Nho, Y.-C., Park, J.-S. & Lim, Y.-M. Preparation of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel by radiation crosslinking and its application for mucoadhesives. Polymers 6, 890–898 (2014).
Bhattarai, N., Gunn, J. & Zhang, M. Chitosan-based hydrogels for controlled, localizeddrug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 62, 83–99 (2010).
Ponchel, G. & Irache, J.-M. Specific and non-specific bioadhesive particulate systems for oral delivery to the gastrointestinal tract. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 34, 191–219 (1998).
Shojaei, A. H., Paulson, J. & Honary, S. Evaluation of poly(acrylic acid-co-ethylhexyl acrylate) films for mucoadhesive transbuccal drug delivery: factors affecting the force of mucoadhesion. J. Control. Release 67, 223–232 (2000).
Das Neves, J. & Bahia, M. Gels as vaginal drug delivery systems. Int. J. Pharm. 318, 1–14 (2006).
Luppi, B. et al. Novel mucoadhesive nasal inserts based on chitosan/hyaluronate polyelectrolyte complexes for peptide and protein delivery. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 61, 151–157 (2009).
Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M. & Messersmith, P. B. Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings. Science 318, 426–430 (2007).
Lee, B. P., Messersmith, P. B., Israelachvili, J. N. & Waite, J. H. Mussel-inspired adhesives and coatings. Ann. Rev. Mater. Res. 41, 99 (2011).
Brubaker, C. E., Kissler, H., Wang, L.-J., Kaufman, D. B. & Messersmith, P. B. Biological performance of mussel-inspired adhesive in extrahepatic islet transplantation. Biomaterials 31, 420–427 (2010).
Nafea, E., Marson, A., Poole-Warren, L. & Martens, P. Immunoisolating semi-permeable membranes for cell encapsulation: focus on hydrogels. J. Control. Release 154, 110–122 (2011).
Lake, G. J. & Thomas, A. G. Strength of highly elastic materials. Proc. R. Soc. A 300, 108–119 (1967).
Kong, H. J., Wong, E. & Mooney, D. J. Independent control of rigidity and toughness of polymeric hydrogels. Macromolecules 36, 4582–4588 (2003).
Gong, J. P., Katsuyama, Y., Kurokawa, T. & Osada, Y. Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv. Mater. 15, 1155–1158 (2003).
Sun, J. Y. et al. Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489, 133–136 (2012).
Lin, C.-C. & Metters, A. T. Hydrogels in controlled release formulations: network design and mathematical modeling. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 58, 1379–1408 (2006).
Burczak, K., Fujisato, T., Hatada, M. & Ikada, Y. Protein permeation through poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel membranes. Biomaterials 15, 231–238 (1994).
Dubrovskii, S. A. & Rakova, G. V. Elastic and osmotic behavior and network imperfections of nonionic and weakly ionized acrylamide-based hydrogels. Macromolecules 30, 7478–7486 (1997).
Sakai, T. et al. Design and fabrication of a high-strength hydrogel with ideally homogeneous network structure from tetrahedron-like macromonomers. Macromolecules 41, 5379–5384 (2008).
Lee, K. Y. & Mooney, D. J. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem. Rev. 101, 1869–1880 (2001).
Vermonden, T., Censi, R. & Hennink, W. E. Hydrogels for protein delivery. Chem. Rev. 112, 2853–2888 (2012).
Young, M., Carroad, P. & Bell, R. Estimation of diffusion coefficients of proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 947–955 (1980).
Brazel, C. S. & Peppas, N. A. Modeling of drug release from swellable polymers. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 49, 47–58 (2000).
Lin, Y.-H., Liang, H.-F., Chung, C.-K., Chen, M.-C. & Sung, H.-W. Physically crosslinked alginate/N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogels with calcium for oral delivery of protein drugs. Biomaterials 26, 2105–2113 (2005).
Amsden, B. Solute diffusion within hydrogels. Mechanisms and models. Macromolecules 31, 8382–8395 (1998).
MacArthur, J. W. Jr. et al. Sustained release of engineered stromal cell-derived factor 1-α from injectable hydrogels effectively recruits endothelial progenitor cells and preserves ventricular function after myocardial infarction. Circulation 128, S79–S86 (2013).
Boontheekul, T., Kong, H. J. & Mooney, D. J. Controlling alginate gel degradation utilizing partial oxidation and bimodal molecular weight distribution. Biomaterials 26, 2455–2465 (2005).
O'shea, T. M., Aimetti, A. A., Kim, E., Yesilyurt, V. & Langer, R. Synthesis and characterization of a library of in-situ curing, nonswelling ethoxylated polyol thiol-ene hydrogels for tailorable macromolecule delivery. Adv. Mater. 27, 65–72 (2015).
Ishihara, M. et al. Controlled release of fibroblast growth factors and heparin from photocrosslinked chitosan hydrogels and subsequent effect on in vivo vascularization. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 64, 551–559 (2003).
Lutolf, M. et al. Synthetic matrix metalloproteinase-sensitive hydrogels for the conduction of tissue regeneration: engineering cell-invasion characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 5413–5418 (2003).
Um, S. H. et al. Enzyme-catalysed assembly of DNA hydrogel. Nat. Mater. 5, 797–801 (2006).
Purcell, B. P. et al. Injectable and bioresponsive hydrogels for on-demand matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Nat. Mater. 13, 653–661 (2014). This study features a biomolecule-responsive hydrogel that can degrade in response to MMPs and release drugs for the treatment of myocardial infarction.
Fischel-Ghodsian, F., Brown, L., Mathiowitz, E., Brandenburg, D. & Langer, R. Enzymatically controlled drug delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2403–2406 (1988).
Podual, K., Doyle, F. J. & Peppas, N. A. Glucose-sensitivity of glucose oxidase-containing cationic copolymer hydrogels having poly(ethylene glycol) grafts. J. Control. Release 67, 9–17 (2000).
Maitz, M. F. et al. Bio-responsive polymer hydrogels homeostatically regulate blood coagulation. Nat. Commun. 4, 2168 (2013).
Lin, K. Y., Lo, J. H., Consul, N., Kwong, G. A. & Bhatia, S. N. Self-titrating anticoagulant nanocomplexes that restore homeostatic regulation of the coagulation cascade. ACS Nano 8, 8776–8785 (2014).
Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Hua, Y., Baumgartner, R. & Cheng, J. Trigger-responsive poly(β-amino ester) hydrogels. ACS Macro Lett. 3, 693–697 (2014).
Tibbitt, M. W., Han, B. W., Kloxin, A. M. & Anseth, K. S. Synthesis and application of photodegradable microspheres for spatiotemporal control of protein delivery. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 100, 1647–1654 (2012).
Yan, B., Boyer, J.-C., Habault, D., Branda, N. R. & Zhao, Y. Near infrared light triggered release of biomacromolecules from hydrogels loaded with upconversion nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 16558–16561 (2012).
Siepmann, J. & Göpferich, A. Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 48, 229–247 (2001).
Yu, H., Lu, J. & Xiao, C. Preparation and properties of novel hydrogels from oxidized konjac glucomannan cross-linked chitosan for in vitro drug delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 7, 1100–1111 (2007).
Sawhney, A. S., Pathak, C. P. & Hubbell, J. A. Bioerodible hydrogels based on photopolymerized poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(α-hydroxy acid) diacrylate macromers. Macromolecules 26, 581–587 (1993).
Ma, G., Miao, B. & Song, C. Thermosensitive PCL-PEG-PCL hydrogels: synthesis, characterization, and delivery of proteins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 116, 1985–1993 (2010).
van de Manakker, F. et al. Protein-release behavior of self-assembled PEG–β-cyclodextrin/PEG–cholesterol hydrogels. Adv. Func. Mater. 19, 2992–3001 (2009).
Brannonpeppas, L. & Peppas, N. A. Equilibrium swelling behavior of pH-sensitive hydrogels. Chem. Eng. Sci. 46, 715–722 (1991).
Hong, W., Zhao, X., Zhou, J. & Suo, Z. A theory of coupled diffusion and large deformation in polymeric gels. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 56, 1779–1793 (2008).
Hirokawa, Y. & Tanaka, T. Volume phase-transition in a nonionic gel. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 6379–6380 (1984).
Obaidat, A. A. & Park, K. Characterization of protein release through glucose-sensitive hydrogel membranes. Biomaterials 18, 801–806 (1997).
Kokufata, E., Zhang, Y.-Q. & Tanaka, T. Saccharide-sensitive phase transition of a lectin-loaded gel. Nature 351, 302–304 (1991).
Zhang, S. et al. A pH-responsive supramolecular polymer gel as an enteric elastomer for use in gastric devices. Nat. Mater. 14, 1065–1071 (2015).
Ohmine, I. & Tanaka, T. Salt effects on the phase-transition of ionic gels. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 5725–5729 (1982).
Murdan, S. Electro-responsive drug delivery from hydrogels. J. Control. Release 92, 1–17 (2003).
Mumper, R. J., Huffman, A. S., Puolakkainen, P. A., Bouchard, L. S. & Gombotz, W. R. Calcium-alginate beads for the oral delivery of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1): stabilization of TGF-β1 by the addition of polyacrylic acid within acid-treated beads. J. Control. Release 30, 241–251 (1994).
Kanamala, M., Wilson, W. R., Yang, M., Palmer, B. D. & Wu, Z. Mechanisms and biomaterials in pH-responsive tumour targeted drug delivery: a review. Biomaterials 85, 152–167 (2016).
Shirakura, T., Kelson, T. J., Ray, A., Malyarenko, A. E. & Kopelman, R. Hydrogel nanoparticles with thermally controlled drug release. ACS Macro Lett. 3, 602–606 (2014).
Ankareddi, I. & Brazel, C. S. Synthesis and characterization of grafted thermosensitive hydrogels for heating activated controlled release. Int. J. Pharm. 336, 241–247 (2007).
Huebsch, N. et al. Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9762–9767 (2014).
Brudno, Y. & Mooney, D. J. On-demand drug delivery from local depots. J. Control. Release 219, 8–17 (2015).
Lee, K. Y., Peters, M. C., Anderson, K. W. & Mooney, D. J. Controlled growth factor release from synthetic extracellular matrices. Nature 408, 998–1000 (2000).
Liu, T.-Y., Hu, S.-H., Liu, T.-Y., Liu, D.-M. & Chen, S.-Y. Magnetic-sensitive behavior of intelligent ferrogels for controlled release of drug. Langmuir 22, 5974–5978 (2006).
Hu, S.-H., Liu, T.-Y., Liu, D.-M. & Chen, S.-Y. Nano-ferrosponges for controlled drug release. J. Control. Release 121, 181–189 (2007).
Zhao, X. et al. Active scaffolds for on-demand drug and cell delivery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 67–72 (2011).
Mitragotri, S. Healing sound: the use of ultrasound in drug delivery and other therapeutic applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Dis. 4, 255–260 (2005).
Mitragotri, S., Blankschtein, D. & Langer, R. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal protein delivery. Science 269, 850–853 (1995).
Mann, B. K., Schmedlen, R. H. & West, J. L. Tethered-TGF-β increases extracellular matrix production of vascular smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 22, 439–444 (2001).
Kolate, A. et al. PEG — a versatile conjugating ligand for drugs and drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 192, 67–81 (2014).
Ehrbar, M. et al. Cell-demanded liberation of VEGF121 from fibrin implants induces local and controlled blood vessel growth. Circ. Res. 94, 1124–1132 (2004).
Traub, S. et al. The promotion of endothelial cell attachment and spreading using FNIII10 fused to VEGF-A 165. Biomaterials 34, 5958–5968 (2013).
Van Hove, A. H., Beltejar, M.-J. G. & Benoit, D. S. Development and in vitro assessment of enzymatically-responsive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for the delivery of therapeutic peptides. Biomaterials 35, 9719–9730 (2014).
Greenwald, R. B. et al. Controlled release of proteins from their poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates: drug delivery systems employing 1, 6-elimination. Bioconjugate Chem. 14, 395–403 (2003).
Schneider, E. L., Henise, J., Reid, R., Ashley, G. W. & Santi, D. V. Hydrogel drug delivery system using self-cleaving covalent linkers for once-a-week administration of exenatide. Bioconjugate Chem. 27, 1210–1215 (2016).
Shah, N. J. et al. Adaptive growth factor delivery from a polyelectrolyte coating promotes synergistic bone tissue repair and reconstruction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12847–12852 (2014).
Macdonald, M. L. et al. Tissue integration of growth factor-eluting layer-by-layer polyelectrolyte multilayer coated implants. Biomaterials 32, 1446–1453 (2011).
Silva, E. A. & Mooney, D. J. Effects of VEGF temporal and spatial presentation on angiogenesis. Biomaterials 31, 1235–1241 (2010).
Kolambkar, Y. M. et al. An alginate-based hybrid system for growth factor delivery in the functional repair of large bone defects. Biomaterials 32, 65–74 (2011).
Martino, M. M. et al. Growth factors engineered for super-affinity to the extracellular matrix enhance tissue healing. Science 343, 885–888 (2014). Growth factors were engineered to bind strongly to the extracellular matrix, which led to superior tissue repair and decreased side effects in the treatment of diabetic wounds, compared with the wild-type proteins, which have low affinity to the extracellular matrix.
Pike, D. B. et al. Heparin-regulated release of growth factors in vitro and angiogenic response in vivo to implanted hyaluronan hydrogels containing VEGF and bFGF. Biomaterials 27, 5242–5251 (2006).
Freeman, I., Kedem, A. & Cohen, S. The effect of sulfation of alginate hydrogels on the specific binding and controlled release of heparin-binding proteins. Biomaterials 29, 3260–3268 (2008).
Freudenberg, U. et al. Heparin desulfation modulates VEGF release and angiogenesis in diabetic wounds. J. Control. Release 220, 79–88 (2015).
Thatiparti, T. R., Shoffstall, A. J. & von Recum, H. A. Cyclodextrin-based device coatings for affinity-based release of antibiotics. Biomaterials 31, 2335–2347 (2010).
Zhang, P., Cheetham, A. G., Lin, Y.-a. & Cui, H. Self-assembled Tat nanofibers as effective drug carrier and transporter. ACS Nano 7, 5965–5977 (2013).
Soukasene, S. et al. Antitumor activity of peptide amphiphile nanofiber-encapsulated camptothecin. ACS Nano 5, 9113–9121 (2011).
Jensen, B. E., Dávila, I. & Zelikin, A. N. Poly(vinyl alcohol) physical hydrogels: matrix-mediated drug delivery using spontaneously eroding substrate. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 5916–5926 (2016).
Mateen, R. & Hoare, T. Injectable, in situ gelling, cyclodextrin–dextran hydrogels for the partitioning-driven release of hydrophobic drugs. J. Mater. Chem. B 2, 5157–5167 (2014).
Kearney, C. J. & Mooney, D. J. Macroscale delivery systems for molecular and cellular payloads. Nat. Mater. 12, 1004–1017 (2013).
Alconcel, S. N., Baas, A. S. & Maynard, H. D. FDA-approved poly(ethylene glycol)–protein conjugate drugs. Polym. Chem. 2, 1442–1448 (2011).
Fishburn, C. S. The pharmacology of PEGylation: balancing PD with PK to generate novel therapeutics. J. Pharm. Sci. 97, 4167–4183 (2008).
Lee, S., Greenwald, R. B., McGuire, J., Yang, K. & Shi, C. Drug delivery systems employing 1, 6-elimination: releasable poly(ethylene glycol) conjugates of proteins. Bioconjugate Chem. 12, 163–169 (2001).
Cheetham, A. G., Ou, Y.-C., Zhang, P. & Cui, H. Linker-determined drug release mechanism of free camptothecin from self-assembling drug amphiphiles. Chem. Commun. 50, 6039–6042 (2014).
Jo, Y. S., Gantz, J., Hubbell, J. A. & Lutolf, M. P. Tailoring hydrogel degradation and drug release via neighboring amino acid controlled ester hydrolysis. Soft Matter 5, 440–446 (2009).
Geng, H., Song, H., Qi, J. & Cui, D. Sustained release of VEGF from PLGA nanoparticles embedded thermo-sensitive hydrogel in full-thickness porcine bladder acellular matrix. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 1–8 (2011).
Lee, J. & Lee, K. Y. Injectable microsphere/hydrogel combination systems for localized protein delivery. Macromol. Biosci. 9, 671–676 (2009).
Johnston, C. T., Premachandra, G. S., Szabo, T., Lok, J. & Schoonheydt, R. A. Interaction of biological molecules with clay minerals: a combined spectroscopic and sorption study of lysozyme on saponite. Langmuir 28, 611–619 (2011).
Dawson, J. I. & Oreffo, R. O. Clay: new opportunities for tissue regeneration and biomaterial design. Adv. Mater. 25, 4069–4086 (2013).
Takahashi, T., Yamada, Y., Kataoka, K. & Nagasaki, Y. Preparation of a novel PEG–clay hybrid as a DDS material: dispersion stability and sustained release profiles. J. Control. Release 107, 408–416 (2005).
Abdurrahmanoglu, S. & Okay, O. Rheological behavior of polymer-clay nanocomposite hydrogels: effect of nanoscale interactions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 116, 2328–2335 (2010).
Appel, E. A. et al. Exploiting electrostatic interactions in polymer–nanoparticle hydrogels. ACS Macro Lett. 4, 848–852 (2015).
Khaled, S. Z. et al. One-pot synthesis of pH-responsive hybrid nanogel particles for the intracellular delivery of small interfering RNA. Biomaterials 87, 57–68 (2016).
Wichterle, O. & Lim, D. Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 185, 117–118 (1960).
Ritger, P. L. & Peppas, N. A. A simple equation for description of solute release I. Fickian and non-Fickian release from non-swellable devices in the form of slabs, spheres, cylinders or discs. J. Control. Release 5, 23–36 (1987).
Ritger, P. L. & Peppas, N. A. A simple equation for description of solute release II. Fickian and anomalous release from swellable devices. J. Control. Release 5, 37–42 (1987).
Schmidt, J. J., Rowley, J. & Kong, H. J. Hydrogels used for cell-based drug delivery. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 87, 1113–1122 (2008).
Fischbach, M. A., Bluestone, J. A. & Lim, W. A. Cell-based therapeutics: the next pillar of medicine. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 179ps177 (2013).
Laflamme, M. A. et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1015–1024 (2007).
Ballios, B. G. et al. A hyaluronan-based injectable hydrogel improves the survival and integration of stem cell progeny following transplantation. Stem Cell Rep. 4, 1031–1045 (2015).
Robey, T. E., Saiget, M. K., Reinecke, H. & Murry, C. E. Systems approaches to preventing transplanted cell death in cardiac repair. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 45, 567–581 (2008).
Rustad, K. C. et al. Enhancement of mesenchymal stem cell angiogenic capacity and stemness by a biomimetic hydrogel scaffold. Biomaterials 33, 80–90 (2012).
Lim, F. & Sun, A. M. Microencapsulated islets as bioartificial endocrine pancreas. Science 210, 908–910 (1980).
Trivedi, N. et al. Islets in alginate macrobeads reverse diabetes despite minimal acute insulin secretory responses. Transplantation 71, 203–211 (2001).
Wang, N., Adams, G., Buttery, L., Falcone, F. H. & Stolnik, S. Alginate encapsulation technology supports embryonic stem cells differentiation into insulin-producing cells. J. Biotechnol. 144, 304–312 (2009).
Liras, A. Future research and therapeutic applications of human stem cells: general, regulatory, and bioethical aspects. J. Transl. Med. 8, 131 (2010).
Ma, M. et al. Core–shell hydrogel microcapsules for improved islets encapsulation. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 667–672 (2013).
Parisi-Amon, A., Mulyasasmita, W., Chung, C. & Heilshorn, S. C. Protein-engineered injectable hydrogel to improve retention of transplanted adipose-derived stem cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2, 428–432 (2013).
Roche, E. T. et al. Comparison of biomaterial delivery vehicles for improving acute retention of stem cells in the infarcted heart. Biomaterials 35, 6850–6858 (2014).
Levit, R. D. et al. Cellular encapsulation enhances cardiac repair. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2, e000367 (2013).
Newland, B. et al. Tackling cell transplantation anoikis: an injectable, shape memory cryogel microcarrier platform material for stem cell and neuronal cell growth. Small 11, 5047–5053 (2015).
Alsberg, E., Anderson, K., Albeiruti, A., Franceschi, R. & Mooney, D. Cell-interactive alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. J. Dental Res. 80, 2025–2029 (2001).
Lin, C.-C., Raza, A. & Shih, H. PEG hydrogels formed by thiol-ene photo-click chemistry and their effect on the formation and recovery of insulin-secreting cell spheroids. Biomaterials 32, 9685–9695 (2011).
Rowley, J. A. & Mooney, D. J. Alginate type and RGD density control myoblast phenotype. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 60, 217–223 (2002).
Bidarra, S. J. et al. Injectable in situ crosslinkable RGD-modified alginate matrix for endothelial cells delivery. Biomaterials 32, 7897–7904 (2011).
Burdick, J. A. & Anseth, K. S. Photoencapsulation of osteoblasts in injectable RGD-modified PEG hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23, 4315–4323 (2002).
Benoit, D. S., Schwartz, M. P., Durney, A. R. & Anseth, K. S. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Mater. 7, 816–823 (2008).
Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
Chaudhuri, O. et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat. Mater. 15, 326–334 (2015).
Shin, J.-W. & Mooney, D. J. Improving stem cell therapeutics with mechanobiology. Cell Stem Cell 18, 16–19 (2016).
Alsberg, E. et al. Regulating bone formation via controlled scaffold degradation. J. Dental Res. 82, 903–908 (2003).
Griffin, D. R., Weaver, W. M., Scumpia, P. O., Di Carlo, D. & Segura, T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable microporous gel scaffolds assembled from annealed building blocks. Nat. Mater. 14, 737–744 (2015).
Stevens, K. R., Miller, J. S., Blakely, B. L., Chen, C. S. & Bhatia, S. N. Degradable hydrogels derived from PEG-diacrylamide for hepatic tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 103, 3331–3338 (2015).
Schlegel, P. N. & Group, H. S. Efficacy and safety of histrelin subdermal implant in patients with advanced prostate cancer. J. Urol. 175, 1353–1358 (2006).
Jaklenec, A., Stamp, A., Deweerd, E., Sherwin, A. & Langer, R. Progress in the tissue engineering and stem cell industry “are we there yet?”. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 18, 155–166 (2012).
Wurm, A., Nogler, M., Ammann, C. G. & Coraça-Huber, D. C. Effect of storage temperature and antibiotic impregnation on the quantity of bone morphogenetic protein seven in human bone grafts. Int. Orthop. 38, 1513–1517 (2014).
Spiller, K. L. & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Clinical translation of controlled protein delivery systems for tissue engineering. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 5, 101–115 (2015).
Hunziker, E. et al. Translation from research to applications. Tissue Eng. 12, 3341–3364 (2006).
Chen, R. R., Silva, E. A., Yuen, W. W. & Mooney, D. J. Spatio–temporal VEGF and PDGF delivery patterns blood vessel formation and maturation. Pharm. Res. 24, 258–264 (2007).
Kanczler, J. M. et al. The effect of the delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenic protein-2 to osteoprogenitor cell populations on bone formation. Biomaterials 31, 1242–1250 (2010).
Basmanav, F. B., Kose, G. T. & Hasirci, V. Sequential growth factor delivery from complexed microspheres for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29, 4195–4204 (2008).
Kearney, C. J. et al. Switchable release of entrapped nanoparticles from alginate hydrogels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 4, 1634–1639 (2015).
Brudno, Y. et al. Refilling drug delivery depots through the blood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 12722–12727 (2014). A new paradigm of refilling hydrogel drug depots that are already present in the body was presented, and the utility of highly specific drug–polymer interactions for this application was also demonstrated.
Brudno, Y. et al. In vivo targeting through click chemistry. ChemMedChem. 10, 617–620 (2015).
Saltzman, W. M. & Radomsky, M. L. Drugs released from polymers: diffusion and elimination in brain tissue. Chem. Eng. Sci. 46, 2429–2444 (1991).
Weiser, J. R. & Saltzman, W. M. Controlled release for local delivery of drugs: barriers and models. J. Control. Release 190, 664–673 (2014). This review provides a comprehensive overview of mathematical models for controlled drug release, highlighting the effect of tissue barriers on drug transport in the body.
Santini, J. T., Cima, M. J. & Langer, R. A controlled-release microchip. Nature 397, 335–338 (1999).
Grayson, A. C. R. et al. Multi-pulse drug delivery from a resorbable polymeric microchip device. Nat. Mater. 2, 767–772 (2003).
Santini, J. T. Jr, Richards, A. C., Scheidt, R., Cima, M. J. & Langer, R. Microchips as controlled drug-delivery devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 2396–2407 (2000).
Lin, S. et al. Stretchable hydrogel electronics and devices. Adv. Mater. 28, 4497–4505 (2016).
Flory, P. J. & Rehner, J. Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II Swelling. J. Chem. Phys. 11, 521–526 (1943).
Kuijpers, A. et al. Characterization of the network structure of carbodiimide cross-linked gelatin gels. Macromolecules 32, 3325–3333 (1999).
Anseth, K. S., Bowman, C. N. & Brannon-Peppas, L. Mechanical properties of hydrogels and their experimental determination. Biomaterials 17, 1647–1657 (1996).
Koshy, S. T. et al. Click-crosslinked injectable gelatin hydrogels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5, 541–547 (2016).
Li, J. Y., Hu, Y. H., Vlassak, J. J. & Suo, Z. G. Experimental determination of equations of state for ideal elastomeric gels. Soft Matter 8, 8121–8128 (2012).
Hu, Y. H., Zhao, X. H., Vlassak, J. J. & Suo, Z. G. Using indentation to characterize the poroelasticity of gels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 121904 (2010).
Drury, J. L., Dennis, R. G. & Mooney, D. J. The tensile properties of alginate hydrogels. Biomaterials 25, 3187–3199 (2004).
Adhikari, B. & Banerjee, A. Short peptide based hydrogels: incorporation of graphene into the hydrogel. Soft Matter 7, 9259–9266 (2011).
Waters, D. J. et al. Morphology of photopolymerized end-linked poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels by small-angle X-ray scattering. Macromolecules 43, 6861–6870 (2010).
Krogstad, D. V. et al. Small angle neutron scattering study of complex coacervate micelles and hydrogels formed from ionic diblock and triblock copolymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 13011–13018 (2014).
Zhang, X., Hansing, J., Netz, R. R. & DeRouchey, J. E. Particle transport through hydrogels is charge asymmetric. Biophys. J. 108, 530–539 (2015).
Fatin-Rouge, N., Starchev, K. & Buffle, J. Size effects on diffusion processes within agarose gels. Biophys. J. 86, 2710–2719 (2004).
This work was supported by the government under R01DE0130333 awarded by the US National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Health, and award A21448 from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. The authors thank L. Gu and A. Göpferich for discussions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, J., Mooney, D. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Nat Rev Mater 1, 16071 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
Scientific Reports (2021)
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Nanotechnology (2021)
Convergent synthesis of diversified reversible network leads to liquid metal-containing conductive hydrogel adhesives
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (2021)