Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Identification of increased genetic risk scores for schizophrenia in treatment-resistant patients

Subjects

A Corrigendum to this article was published on 14 April 2015

Schizophrenia is a severe neuropsychiatric disorder that affects around 0.5–1% of the population. Research has shown that early intervention increases the likelihood of remission and reduces the severity of symptoms, as well as attenuates the decline in social and overall functioning.1

Around 30% of patients fail to respond adequately to the usual antipsychotic medications, and are classified as being treatment resistant. These patients can be treated with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine,2 the only evidence-based pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.3 However, clozapine is associated with severe adverse events and is thus only prescribed in patients who have failed to respond to trials of two other antipsychotics.4 This process may take many years.5 Since an extended duration of untreated psychosis and lack of efficacy for the initial treatment are however associated with a poorer prognosis,6 identification of patients who will eventually require clozapine is an important goal for improving clinical outcome. Research to identify clinical predictors of response prior to treatment initiation has shown that premorbid social functioning (PSF) is among the most reliable measures (for a review see Schennach et al.6). Furthermore, reports of an association between a family history of psychosis and an unfavourable treatment response7 suggest the influence of genetic factors. However, few candidate gene studies have been conducted and their results are inconsistent.8

The present study investigated whether a higher genetic risk for schizophrenia is associated with treatment outcome. Genetic risk was assessed by measuring the polygenic risk score, based on the aggregated number of risk loci previously identified from genome-wide association studies in schizophrenia patients9 with a history of clozapine treatment (Cloz+, n=434) compared to patients with no history of clozapine treatment (Cloz, n=370). Furthermore, the Cloz+ and Cloz groups were compared in terms of selected premorbid clinical features (that is, age and mode of onset; poor premorbid work and social adjustment; premorbid personality disorder; alcohol and drug abuse; family history of schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorder; psychosocial stressors; see Supplementary Information).

The polygenic risk score was increased in Cloz+ compared to Cloz patients (P=0.02). Furthermore, polygenic risk scores were higher in Cloz+ responders compared to Cloz+ non-responders (P=0.06).

Poor PSF was significantly more frequent in Cloz+ patients (P=8.1 × 10−5; odds ratio (OR)=1.85; confidence interval (CI)=[1.35–2.55]). Cloz+ patients also displayed a significantly earlier age-at-onset ( = 23.0; s.d. = 8.26) than Cloz patients ( = 25.5, s.d. = 9.12; P = 3.0 × 10−6), and a higher frequency of insidious disease onset (P=4.4 × 10−3). A correlation was observed between poor PSF, early age-at-onset and insidious disease onset. However, this was modest and did not exceed 23% (for details see Supplementary Information). The highest polygenic risk scores were observed in Cloz+ non-responders with poor PSF and an insidious and early disease onset (P=0.04; see Figure 1). These clinical variables correlated with both treatment resistance and polygenic score, and when included in the regression model they diminished the influence of polygenic score to non-significant values, whereas the associations with TRS per se, as corrected for polygenic score, remained significant.

Figure 1
figure 1

Comparison of polygenetic risk scores between: (A) population-based controls vs all schizophrenia patients (SCZ); (B) patients responding to standard medication vs patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) requiring clozapine treatment; (C) patients responding to clozapine vs patients with extreme treatment-resistant schizophrenia (ETRS) not even responding to clozapine; (D) patients with ETRS only vs patients with ETRS and additional poor premorbid social adjustment and early and insidious disease onset (ETRS+; P-values derived from right-tailed logistic regression models).

PowerPoint slide

The finding that poor PSF, an insidious disease onset and an early age-at-onset were associated with poor treatment response is consistent with previous data.10 However, the present study is the first to provide molecular evidence that an increased genetic loading for schizophrenia is a further risk factor. However, full interpretation of the results may depend on the proportion of treatment-resistant individuals in the discovery sample (for further discussion see Supplementary Information).

The absence of a positive family history of schizophrenia from the list of associated outcome features may have been attributable to the limited sample size. However, a post hoc analysis showed that a positive family history of schizophrenia was significantly associated with increased schizophrenia risk score in the overall sample (see Supplementary Table 4).

Our findings may suggest the existence of a more severe, genetically based schizophrenia subgroup, for whom early intervention with clozapine could be considered. This may have important implications for clinical practice, and further research is therefore warranted.

References

  1. Marshall M, Lewis S, Lockwood A, Drake R, Jones P, Croudace T . Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 975–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leucht S, Cipriani A, Spineli L, Mavridis D, Orey D, Richter F et al. Lancet 2013; 382: 951–962.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Essali A, Al-Haj Haasan N, Li C, Rathbone J In: The Cochrane Collaboration, Essali A (eds). Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, UK, 2009. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD000059.pub2 (cited 1 August 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen J, Nielsen RE, Correll CU . J Clin Psychopharmacol 2012; 32: 678–683.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor DM, Young C, Paton C . J Clin Psychiatry 2003; 64: 30–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schennach R, Riedel M, Musil R, Möller H-J . Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2012; 10: 78.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Crespo-Facorro B, de la Foz VO-G, Ayesa-Arriola R, Pérez-Iglesias R, Mata I, Suarez-Pinilla P et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013; 44: 162–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang J-P, Malhotra AK . Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2011; 7: 9–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ripke S, Sanders AR, Kendler KS, Levinson DF, Sklar P, Holmans PA et al. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 969–976.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly DL, Feldman S, Boggs DL, Gale E, Conley RR . Compr Psychiatry 2010; 51: 298–302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) through the Integrated Genome Research Network (IG) MooDS (Systematic Investigation of the Molecular Causes of Major Mood Disorders and Schizophrenia; grant 01GS08144 to Markus M Nöthen and Sven Cichon, grant 01GS08147 to Marcella Rietschel), under the auspices of the National Genome Research Network plus (NGFNplus), and through the Integrated Network IntegraMent (Integrated Understanding of Causes and Mechanisms in Mental Disorders, grant BMBF01ZX1314G), under the auspices of the e:Med Programme. Markus M Nöthen is a member of the DFG-funded Excellence Cluster ImmunoSensation. The research that led to these results received funding from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 279227 (CRESTAR). Further funding was provided by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2011) under grant agreement no. 242257 (ADAMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Rietschel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

David A Collier is a full time employee of Eli Lilly and Company Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest or possible conflicts of interest to declare.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Molecular Psychiatry website

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frank, J., Lang, M., Witt, S. et al. Identification of increased genetic risk scores for schizophrenia in treatment-resistant patients. Mol Psychiatry 20, 150–151 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.56

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2014.56

Further reading

Search

Quick links