The 2008 WHO classification of acute myeloid leukemia includes a category of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes; however, the significance of multilineage dysplasia alone is controversial and its reproducibility has not been evaluated in acute myeloid leukemia. We performed an in-depth analysis of morphologic dysplasia in 159 de novo acute myeloid leukemia cases lacking myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic abnormalities. Using the 2008 WHO criteria, there were 89 acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (56%) and 43 acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (27%), while 27 cases were ambiguous as to myelodysplasia-related changes status due to limited maturing cells (acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable, 17%). On multivariable analysis, neither acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes nor acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable showed significantly different event-free survival compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified in the 137 patients treated with induction chemotherapy. When individual dysplastic features were analyzed, only micromegakaryocytes and hypogranulated myeloid cells emerged as factors significantly associated with shorter event-free survival in a multivariable analysis that included the other significant covariates of age, white blood count, platelet count, abnormal karyotype and stem-cell transplantation. Our findings indicate that the current 2008 WHO definition of multilineage dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia in its current form is not optimal, and that the use of a more restricted definition of morphologic dysplasia results in more relevant risk stratification that is independent of other conventional prognostic factors.
Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogenous disease, with varied patient outcome that reflects both patient-related and disease-related factors. The karyotype at the time of diagnosis provides critical prognostic information, but 40–50% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia have normal or non-specific cytogenetic findings.1, 2 An increasing number of gene mutations have been found that risk-stratify acute myeloid leukemia patients with normal karyotype. Internal tandem duplications of the FLT3 gene (FLT3-ITD) represent one of the most frequently encountered mutations and confer adverse prognosis,3, 4 while NPM1 mutations, found in 35% of cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia, are associated with a favorable outcome in the absence of FLT3-ITD mutation.5
The recent 2008 WHO classification incorporates underlying cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities into acute myeloid leukemia subtyping.6 This classification divides acute myeloid leukemia into groups with recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities, acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, therapy-related myeloid neoplasms, and acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified. Acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 and CEBPA mutations are provisional entities. The category of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes encompasses acute myeloid leukemia occurring after a prior myelodysplastic syndrome or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, as well as those cases with specific myelodysplastic syndrome-associated cytogenetic abnormalities and/or significant morphologic multilineage dysplasia; the latter is defined as the presence of ≥50% dysplastic cells in two or three hematopoietic lineages.6 Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes comprises a large proportion of acute myeloid leukemia cases: applying the 2008 WHO criteria results in up to 48% of all acute myeloid leukemia cases being considered as acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes by meeting one, two or all three of the aforementioned criteria.7 The frequency of morphologically-defined multilineage dysplasia ranges from 30 to 38% in all types of acute myeloid leukemia and is about 25% in all de novo acute myeloid leukemia.8
Although there is general agreement on the poor prognostic impact of a prior myeloid neoplasm or myelodysplastic syndrome-related cytogenetics, the clinical significance of morphologic dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia has been debated.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 In earlier studies, Goasguen et al11 found that the presence of dysgranulopoiesis was associated with a significant decrease in the ability to achieve a complete remission, and dysplastic changes of granulocytes and megakaryocytes were associated with worse event-free survival in a series by Gahn et al.12 Tamura et al13 found that the presence of trilineage dysplasia was associated with lower disease-free survival. A study by Arber et al14 suggested that the less rigid criteria of only two cells lines (rather than trilineage dysplasia) used in the 2001 WHO definition of acute myeloid leukemia with multlineage dysplasia retained prognostic significance.
Other studies applying the WHO criteria for acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes found that morphologic dysplasia alone had no prognostic importance outside of its association with unfavorable karyotype.8, 9, 10 Miesner et al8 found that acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes lacking prior myelodysplastic syndrome or associated cytogenetic abnormalities had a lower incidence of FLT3 mutations, but a similar outcome as acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (57%). Falini et al16 showed that NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia were frequently associated with multilineage dysplasia, but that this did not confer worse clinical outcome. Another study found no significance of dysplasia in NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia, but in patients with wild-type NPM1, those with multilineage dysplasia showed an inferior response to induction and, in younger patients, a lower 5-year survival, suggesting that the prognostic relevance of multilineage dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia might depend on NPM1 mutation status.17 Most recently, Devillier et al. compared acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes to acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified patients in a group younger than 66 years of age and found no difference in relapse-free survival or overall survival; however, the acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes group included patients with prior myelodysplastic syndrome and associated cytogenetic abnormalities.15 A recent study examined de novo intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia patients with wild-type NPM1 and found that multilineage dysplasia had an adverse impact on outcome using a definition of >50% of the cells in one lineage plus >30% in at least one other lineage, which is less strict than the 2008 WHO definition of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes.18 This was also the first study to note that a significant subset of patients (21.5%) did not have enough residual hematopoiesis to assess for dysplasia.18
The reproducibility of scoring dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia has not been evaluated to our knowledge, and could in part explain the varied results obtained in prior studies examining the prognostic significance of multilineage dysplasia. In myelodysplastic syndrome, where the threshold for dysplasia in each lineage is lower (10% rather than 50% for acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes), studies have observed a moderate reproducibility for identifying dysplasia and noted that the degree of agreement could be improved if the features for dyserythropoiesis were refined.19 Specific dysplastic features have shown strong correlation with a diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome compared with non-neoplastic processes, and certain specific dysplastic findings have also been associated with outcome in myelodysplastic syndrome patients.20 In contrast, although the same dysplastic features are used to define both acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes and myelodysplastic syndrome, the spectrum of dysplastic changes seen in acute myeloid leukemia is not well-documented. Neither the 50% dysplasia threshold nor the specific dysplastic features that should be counted have been validated with respect to association with clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Thus, it is unclear if the current morphologic definition of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes is optimal to define a cohort with worse clinical outcome. The goal of this study was to evaluate reproducibility and prognostic significance of morphologic dysplasia assessment in de novo acute myeloid leukemia lacking specific recurrent or myelodysplasia-associated karyotype abnormalities.
Materials and methods
Cases of newly diagnosed de novo acute myeloid leukemia were identified from the pathology archives of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital between 2009 and 2013. All cases had bone marrow aspirate smear and biopsy slides available for review that were diagnosed as acute myeloid leukemia prior to any therapy being administered. Only cases with adequate karyotype, available NPM1 and FLT3 mutation information, and clinical follow-up information were included. Patients who had received any prior cytotoxic therapy, had a prior diagnosis of any myeloid neoplasm, or had karyotype abnormalities of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes or acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities6 were excluded. Only cases with biopsies containing at least 5 mm in length of hematopoietic marrow and with aspirates containing at least 1000 intact hematopoietic cells were included.
Slides from each case (consisting of both bone marrow biopsy and aspirate smears) were viewed in a blinded manner by three hematopathologists (OKW, RPH, and OP) who scored dysplasia in each lineage in increments of 10%. A minimum of 10 megakaryocytes (on biopsies and/or aspirate smears) and 20 erythroids and 20 myeloid elements (in aspirate smears) were required, otherwise a lineage was designated as 'not evaluable'. Specific dysplastic features in each lineage were also scored on a semi-quantitative scale (<10% cells showing the feature=0, 10–25%=1, 26–50%=2, 51–75%=3, and >75%=4). Specific dysplastic features scored in the erythroid lineage included megaloblastoid change, multinucleation, nuclear irregularities, and pyknosis. Dysgranulopoiesis features scored included abnormal nuclear shape (including pseudo Pelger–Huet anomaly with unilobate or bilobed nuclei, as well as nuclear hypersegmentation with six or more lobes) and hypogranulation. Dysmegakaryopoiesis features scored included micromegakaryocytes (mononucleated forms with a diameter of 7–10 μm), forms with two or multiple separated, rounded nuclear lobes, and forms with hypolobated or monolobated nuclei but normal size. Criteria for each dysplastic feature were those described for myelodysplastic syndrome in a recent study.19 The diagnostic pathology reports were reviewed to determine the frequency of an acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes diagnosis based on the original case review.
According to the 2008 WHO classification criteria, the acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes group was defined as cases with an average dysplasia percentage score among the three observers of ≥50% in at least two hematopoietic lineages. Cases with at least 2 lineages showing <50% dysplastic cells formed the acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified group; for the purposes of this study, cases with NPM1 mutation (a provisional acute myeloid leukemia with recurrent genetic abnormalities entity in the 2008 WHO Classification) were included within the acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified group. Cases in which determination of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes or acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified could not be made, comprised the acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable group. In addition to cases lacking two or three evaluable lineages, cases were assigned to this group if one lineage was not evaluable and another had ≥50% dysplastic cells.
The complete blood count and WBC differential results at the time of acute myeloid leukemia diagnosis were recorded. Type of treatment, including date of any allogeneic stem-cell transplant, date of relapse, or disease refractoriness to two induction regimens, and status at last follow-up were recorded for each patient. Complete remission and overall survival were determined as defined by clinical standards.21 Event-free survival was defined as the time from diagnosis to either relapse or death for any reason, whichever occurred first. Patients who were alive and relapse free were censored at the time that they were last known to be relapse free.
Fisher's exact test and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare categorical and continuous variables; for multiple comparisons between acute myeloid leukemia groups, one-way ANOVA and Fisher’s exact test with Bonferroni’s adjustment were used. Event-free survival from diagnosis was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariable subsequent to univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of the patient groups along with other risk factors on event-free survival. For multivariable analyses including both patients with and without stem-cell transplant, stem-cell transplant was included as a time-dependent variable. A P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. The Kendall's coefficient of concordance W with a correction for ties was used to compare the three observers’ scores of dysplasia percentages, acute myeloid leukemia group categorization, and individual dysplastic feature scores. To assess the optimal cutoff points for dysplasia in each lineage and specific morphologic features, the method of recursive partitioning was used, using the criteria of P<0.01 and at least 10 patients in each partition group to be considered statistically significant.
Diagnosis of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Myelodysplasia-Related Changes
The total number of acute myeloid leukemia cases that met study criteria and were evaluated by the observers was 159. By averaging the dysplasia percentages from all 3 observers, the median erythroid dysplasia percentage was 20% (range 0–90%), the median myeloid dysplasia score was 10% (range 0–93%), and the median megakaryocyte dysplasia score was 37% (range 0–100%). Erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic lineages were not evaluable due to insufficient cells in 31 (19%), 25 (16%), and 28 (18%) cases, respectively. The Kendall's coefficient of concordance W among the three observers’ dysplasia percentage scores were 0.906, 0.855, and 0.911 for erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocyte lineages, respectively.
Following the 2008 WHO Classification criteria using the average dysplasia percentages for each lineage, 89 were acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (56%), 43 acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (27%), and 27 acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable (17%). Kendall's coefficient of concordance W among pathologists with respect to acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, and acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable assignment was 0.939. Only 10 cases were diagnosed as acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes in the original pathology reports, representing 5/43 (12%) acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes and 5/89 (6%) acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified cases as characterized in this study. The dysplasia scoring data for the acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, and acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable groups are shown in Table 1. The most frequent dysplastic changes observed in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes were nuclear irregularities in the erythroid lineage, hypogranulation in the myeloid lineage, and micromegakaryocytes and separated nuclear lobes in the megakaryocyte lineage. Examples of the typical dysplastic changes observed in bone marrow aspirates and biopsies are shown in Figure 1.
Comparison of clinical and genetic features between acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, and AML—not evaluable groups is shown in Table 2. Acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable presented with higher WBC, peripheral blood, and bone marrow blast percentage, and higher rate of FLT3-ITD mutation compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (Table 2). Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes had lower hemoglobin level compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified. Abnormal karyotypes were seen in 28/159 cases (18%). The most common abnormalities were +8 (eight cases), +11 (four cases), and +13 (four cases); other trisomies were seen in three cases, chromosome losses in two cases, ring chromosome in one case, and balanced or unbalanced translocations in five cases. There were no significant differences in the blast immunophenotypes (expression of CD34, CD13, CD33, CD117, CD64, CD7, CD11b, or CD19) between the three groups (data not shown).
Clinical Outcome Analysis
For analysis of clinical outcome, only the 137 patients (73 acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, 41 acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, and 23 acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable) who received induction chemotherapy were analyzed. With 75 events (35 in acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, 27 in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, and 13 in acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable) observed among those patients, on univariate analysis, acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes patients had inferior event-free survival compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified patients (P=0.038). There was no significant difference in event-free survival or overall survival between acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable and acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified patients (Figures 2a and b). There was no significant association of any of the three groups with achievement of complete remission (P=0.18). Of the 137 patients, 61 underwent stem-cell transplant in first complete remission, and this group had significantly longer event-free survival compared with the patients who did not receive stem-cell transplant in first complete remission (n=76, P<0.0001). The associations of variables with event-free survival in all 137 patients treated with induction are shown in Table 3. Stepwise multivariable analysis (with stem-cell transplant considered as a time-dependent variable) showed that abnormal karyotype, age, white blood count, and stem-cell transplant, but not the WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes grouping, were independently associated with event-free survival (Table 4).
To determine if the WHO-defined grouping had prognostic significance in the patients treated or not treated with stem-cell transplant, we performed univariate analyses in patients who did or did not receive stem-cell transplant in first complete remission. For patients who did not receive stem-cell transplant in first complete remission, acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable had significantly inferior event-free survival compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (P=0.005), while event-free survival of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes patients was not significantly different from acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (P=0.1; Figure 2c). For patients who underwent stem-cell transplant in first complete remission, there was no significant difference in event-free survival between acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes and acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (P=0.98) or between acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable and acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified (P=0.21; Figure 2d). On stepwise multivariable Cox regression analysis of patients, who did not undergo stem-cell transplant in first complete remission, age >64 (P=0.01) and FLT3-ITD mutation (P=0.0002) were significantly associated with shorter event-free survival when compared with patients ≤64 and patients without FLT3-ITD mutation, but not acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (P=0.11) or acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable (P=0.09) when compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified patients. For patients who underwent stem-cell transplant in first complete remission, stepwise multivariable analysis showed that only abnormal karyotype (P=0.014) was significantly associated with shorter event-free survival compared with those with normal karyotype.
Identification of Specific Morphologic Features Associated with Event-Free Survival
Since we did not find a significant independent effect of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes status on event-free survival, we examined dysplasia in each lineage separately. We also used recursive partitioning to determine if dysplasia cutoffs other than 50% (in 10% increments) were superior with respect to influence on event-free survival in the 137 patients treated with induction therapy. Using the 50% WHO cutoff, erythroid dysplasia was not significantly associated with event-free survival, nor was there any superior cutoff that met the recursive partitioning criteria. Using the 50% WHO cutoff, myeloid dysplasia was not significantly associated with event-free survival (P=0.20); a cutoff of >60% was optimal, but was only borderline associated with inferior event-free survival (P=0.052). Using the 50% WHO cutoff, megakaryocytic dysplasia was borderline associated with event-free survival (P=0.10) and there was no superior cutoff that met recursive partitioning criteria.
We then examined each specific dysplastic feature in univariate analysis for event-free survival. Among all the dysplastic features evaluated (listed in Table 1), only micromegakaryocytes (average score ⩾3, corresponding to >50% micromegakaryocytes, P=0.004) and hypogranulated myeloid cells (average score ⩾3, corresponding to >50% hypogranulated myeloids, P=0.008) were associated with adverse event-free survival. Using the presence of >50% micromegakaryocytes or hypogranulated myeloid cells to define a new group (acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular), there were 28 acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular cases, 31 cases in which micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular status was unassessable due to insufficient megakaryocytes and/or myeloids, and 78 cases with both ≤50% micromegakaryocytes and hypogranular myeloids. Acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular patients had a significantly shorter event-free survival compared with both patients with ≤50% micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular myeloids (P=0.001) and the combined group of patients with ≤50% micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular and unassessable micromegakaryocyte/hypogranular status (P=0.002; Figure 3a), and also shorter overall survival compared with patients with ≤50% micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular myeloids (P=0.006; Figure 3b). There was no significant association of acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular status and achievement of complete remission (P=0.21). Results of stepwise multivariable Cox regression using acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular status as a variable are shown in Table 5. After adjusting for other covariates, acute myeloid leukemia micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular status was associated with inferior event-free survival (HR 2.6 (1.5–4.6), P=0.0008), while the non-assessable group was not significantly associated with event-free survival (HR 1.7 (0.9–3.1), P=0.11) compared with the patients with ≤50% micromegakaryocytes/hypogranular myeloids.
Previous studies of acute myeloid leukemia have found conflicting results regarding the significance of morphologic dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Early studies found that trilineage dysplasia correlated with worse overall survival and event-free survival in acute myeloid leukemia,11, 12, 13, 14 and provided the basis for creating the entity of acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia in the 2001 WHO Classification.19, 22 However, later studies reported conflicting results,8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 although some of these studies were not limited to de novo acute myeloid leukemia and most did not include examination of bone marrow biopsies, which has been shown to facilitate the identification of dysplastic changes among erythroid cells and megakaryocytes in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes.23 Most recently, Rozman et al18 suggested that a broader definition of dysplasia with a lower threshold than the WHO criteria may be more clinically meaningful. Our retrospective study of 159 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia lacking specific cytogenetic abnormalities shows that the identification of morphologic dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia is reproducible, with high concordance among the three hematopathologists.
Unlike prior studies, we graded the percentage of dysplastic elements from 0 to 100% and also evaluated the frequency of specific types of dysplasia to examine the prognostic relevance of individual morphologic dysplastic findings. We found that acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes, as defined by 2008 WHO Classification, was present in 27% of de novo acute myeloid leukemia cases lacking specific cytogenetic abnormalities, a rate similar to prior studies.9, 18 We found that the spectrum of dysplastic changes seen in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes is similar to that observed in myelodysplastic syndrome. Despite a high concordance between the hematopathologists in scoring acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes in this retrospective review, the number of acute myeloid leukemia cases designated as acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes in diagnostic pathology reports was significantly lower (only 6% as compared with 27% identified by the blinded retrospective review). This finding suggests that the WHO diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes based on morphologic dysplasia is not being uniformly applied in clinical practice, even in two large academic medical centers during a time range of 2009–2013 (after publication of the 2008 WHO Classification that mandated the application of these criteria).
Our study also showed that a high frequency of acute myeloid leukemia cases (17% in our cohort) did not have sufficient maturing hematopoietic elements present for evaluation of dysplasia, similar to findings reported by Rozman et al.18 It is unclear in the current WHO Classification whether these cases should be designated as acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes or as acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified. This non-evaluable group has significantly higher white blood count, peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts, FLT3-ITD mutation incidence, and shorter event-free survival (in patients who did not undergo stem-cell transplant in first complete remission) compared with acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified, consistent with a more aggressive form of acute myeloid leukemia. However, on multivariable analysis, acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable was not significantly associated with shorter event-free survival, suggesting that the poorer outcome of this group in the univariate analysis reflects its association with higher age, white blood count, and FLT3-ITD mutation. Acute myeloid leukemia with FLT3-ITD mutation has higher bone marrow blast counts compared with acute myeloid leukemia lacking FLT3-ITD,24 resulting in smaller numbers of maturing elements that are required to distinguish acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes from acute myeloid leukemia—not otherwise specified.
We found that the WHO-defined acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes designation had no significant bearing on event-free survival or overall survival on multivariable analysis. Even when considering acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes and acute myeloid leukemia—not evaluable together as one group, there was no association with event-free survival in multivariable analysis that included FLT3-ITD status and age (data not shown). We examined the dysplasia percentage in each lineage independently and explored cutoffs for dysplasia other than the WHO-defined threshold of 50%, but did not find cutoffs that were significantly superior to the WHO acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes threshold; in particular, erythroid dysplasia appeared to have no significant association with event-free survival. We also found that the vast majority of individual morphologic dysplastic features in each hematopoietic lineage had no association with event-free survival. However, the presence of >50% micromegakaryocytes and >50% hypogranulated myeloid cells were both associated with adverse event-free survival, an effect that was independent of FLT3 and NPM1 mutation status. Although this retrospective study included a substantial proportion of patients treated with stem-cell transplant, we found that the impact of these dysplastic features was also independent of stem-cell transplant. In a study by Verburgh et al20 on myelodysplastic syndrome without excess blasts, micromegakaryocytes were also found to have a particularly strong impact on prognosis compared with other features of dysmegakaryopoiesis. In an early small study comparing de novo acute myeloid leukemia with trilineage dysplasia to acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome, the rate of micromegakaryocytes was higher in acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome.25
Our data suggest that only certain specific dysplastic features (micromegakaryocytes and hypogranulated neutrophils) may be prognostically relevant in de novo acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and that a more restrictive definition of dysplastic changes defining acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes may be warranted. Such a more limited and simplified definition of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes may increase its applicability, as we found that the WHO Classification diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes based on morphology alone does not appear to be consistently applied in practice. To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore the optimal cutoff of dysplastic changes in each lineage and to examine the effect of specific dysplastic morphologies on the outcome of de novo acute myeloid leukemia. The results of our study support those of Rozman et al,19 and suggest that morphologic dysplasia does have clinical significance and should continue to be identified in pathology reports. Our study included patients with NPM1 mutation and had a higher proportion of patients who underwent stem-cell transplant, which may explain our more restricted definition of morphologic dysplasia (micromegakaryocytes and hypogranulated myeloid cells) compared with the more broad definition encompassing all three lineages suggested in the study by Rozman et al.19 Our study also incorporated findings in bone marrow trephine biopsies, which are important in evaluating megakaryocytic dysplasia.20
Mutational profiling has an increasing role in the risk stratification of acute myeloid leukemia, and specific mutations such as ASXL1 have been associated with morphologic dysplasia in acute myeloid leukemia.26 Comprehensive mutational analysis may define a biologically relevant group of myelodysplastic syndrome-related acute myeloid leukemia that is independent of morphologic dysplasia or myelodysplastic syndrome history.27 Our study did not examine the effect of additional mutations other than FLT3 and NPM1, and thus we could not determine if our morphologic findings were independent of other additional mutations known to have prognostic significance in acute myeloid leukemia. However, next-generation sequencing is not yet widely available in all centers, and optimal risk stratification for all myeloid diseases ideally incorporates a combination of clinical features, karyotype, molecular features, as well as morphology. In the context of this multimodality approach, we propose that the finding of frequent micromegakaryocytes or hypogranular myeloid cells can define adverse-risk morphology in de novo acute myeloid leukemia that lacks specific cytogenetic abnormalities.
Byrd JC, Mrózek K, Dodge RK et al. Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 2002;100:4325–4336.
Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F et al. The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. The Medical Research Council Adult and Children's Leukaemia Working Parties. Blood 1998;92:2322–2333.
Levis M . FLT3 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: what is the best approach in 2013? Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2013;2013:220–226.
Döhner H, Estey EH, Amadori S et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2010;115:453–474.
Falini B, Mecucci C, Tiacci E et al. Cytoplasmic nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N Engl J Med 2005;352:254–266.
Arber DA, Brunning RD, Orazi A et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia related changes In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL et al. (eds). WHO Classification of Tumor of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th (edn). International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2008, pp 124–127..
Weinberg OK, Seetharam M, Ren L et al. Clinical characterization of acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes as defined by the 2008 WHO classification system. Blood 2009;113:1906–1908.
Miesner M, Haferlach C, Bacher U et al. Multilineage dysplasia (MLD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) correlates with MDS-related cytogenetic abnormalities and a prior history of MDS or MDS/MPN but has no independent prognostic relevance: a comparison of 408 cases classified as "AML not otherwise specified" (AML-NOS) or "AML with myelodysplasia-related changes" (AML-MRC). Blood 2010;116:2742–2751.
Wandt H, Schäkel U, Kroschinsky F et al. MLD according to the WHO classification in AML has no correlation with age and no independent prognostic relevance as analyzed in 1766 patients. Blood 2008;111:1855–1861.
Haferlach T, Schoch C, Löffler H et al. Morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is related to unfavorable cytogenetics but has no independent prognostic relevance under the conditions of intensive induction therapy: results of a multiparameter analysis from the German AML Cooperative Group studies. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:256–265.
Goasguen JE, Matsuo T, Cox C et al. Evaluation of the dysmyelopoiesis in 336 patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: major importance of dysgranulopoiesis for remission and survival. Leukemia 1992;6:520–525.
Gahn B, Haase D, Unterhalt M et al. De novo AML with dysplastic hematopoiesis: cytogenetic and prognostic significance. Leukemia 1996;10:946–951.
Tamura S, Takemoto Y, Wada H et al. Significance of trilineage myelodysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukaemia during remission rather than at diagnosis. Br J Haematol 1998;101:743–748.
Arber DA, Stein AS, Carter NH et al. Prognostic impact of acute myeloid leukemia classification. Importance of detection of recurring cytogenetic abnormalities and multilineage dysplasia on survival. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:672–680.
Devillier R, Gelsi-Boyer V, Murati A et al. Prognostic significance of myelodysplasia-related changes according to the WHO classification among ELN-intermediate-risk AML patients. Am J Hematol 2014;90:E22–E24.
Falini B, Macijewski K, Weiss T et al. Multilineage dysplasia has no impact on biologic, clinicopathologic, and prognostic features of AML with mutated nucleophosmin (NPM1. Blood 2010;115:3776–3786.
Díaz-Beyá M, Rozman M, Pratcorona M et al. The prognostic value of multilineage dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics is dependent on NPM1 mutational status. Blood 2010;116:6147–6148.
Rozman M, Navarro JT, Arenillas L et al. Multilineage dysplasia is associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and wild-type NPM1. Ann Hematol 2014;93:1695–1703.
Della Porta MG, Travaglino E, Boveri E et al. Minimal morphological criteria for defining bone marrow dysplasia: a basis for clinical implementation of WHO classification of myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia 2015;29:66–75.
Verburgh E, Achten R, Louw VJ et al. A new disease categorization of low-grade myelodysplastic syndromes based on the expression of cytopenia and dysplasia in one versus more than one lineage improves on the WHO classification. Leukemia 2007;21:668–677.
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4642–4649.
Brunning RD, Matutes E, Harris NL et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H et al. (eds) World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Lyons, France, 2001, pp 88–89..
Ngo N, Lampert IA, Naresh KN . Bone marrow trephine findings in acute myeloid leukaemia with multilineage dysplasia. Br J Haematol 2008;140:279–286.
Hasserjian RP, Campigotto F, Klepeis V et al. De novo acute myeloid leukemia with 20-29% blasts is less aggressive than acute myeloid leukemia with ≥30% blasts in older adults: a Bone Marrow Pathology Group study. Am J Hematol 2014;89:E193–E199.
Kuriyama K, Miyazaki Y, Arimura K et al. Morphological comparison of dysplastic changes between de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with trilineage myelodysplasia and AML developed from de novo myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk Res 1995;19:121–125.
Devillier R, Gelsi-Boyer V, Brecqueville M et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes are characterized by a specific molecular pattern with high frequency of ASXL1 mutations. Am J Hematol 2012;87:659–662.
Lindsley RC, Mar BG, Mazzola E et al. Acute myeloid leukemia is defined by distinct somatic mutations. Blood 2015;125:1367–1376.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Weinberg, O., Pozdnyakova, O., Campigotto, F. et al. Reproducibility and prognostic significance of morphologic dysplasia in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Mod Pathol 28, 965–976 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.55
ASXL1 mutation as a surrogate marker in acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia‐related changes and normal karyotype
Cancer Medicine (2020)
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology (2020)
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (2020)
Leukemia Research (2019)
Clinical, immunophenotypic, and genomic findings of acute undifferentiated leukemia and comparison to acute myeloid leukemia with minimal differentiation: a study from the bone marrow pathology group
Modern Pathology (2019)