Crohn’s disease (CD) is an incurable immune-mediated disorder that can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract. The prevailing etiological hypothesis is that a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors leads to excessive inflammatory responses toward the intestinal commensal microbiota.1, 2 Heritability of CD is relatively high compared with other autoimmune diseases such as ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis, with a genetic risk ratio estimated at 15–27.3 Genome-wide association studies have identified over 160 risk-conferring loci for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), many of which are shared by CD and UC.4, 5, 6 Several of these genes code for molecules involved in host defense against pathogens, such as nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2), ATG16L1, and those implicated in the T helper type 17 (Th17) pathway.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Three NOD2 polymorphisms, R702W, G908R, and L1007fs, account for 80% of CD-associated variants and are established as the most common genetic risk factor for developing CD.7

NOD2 recognizes muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a peptidoglycan breakdown product of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. NOD2 activation promotes receptor interacting protein 2 binding and nuclear factor (NF)-κB essential modulator ubiquitination, stimulating NF-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation to induce expression of chemokines and cytokines. The three common genetic variants in the NOD2 gene all result in defective MDP responses.8 Innate immune responses mediated by NOD2, including production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and antimicrobial peptides, as well as induction of autophagy, are thought to have a central role in the pathogenesis of CD and these processes are impaired in patients homozygous for NOD2 mutations.9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Bearing a NOD2 mutation alone is insufficient for developing CD. A combination of susceptibility alleles that modulate microbial handling and the immune response may lead to CD subsequent to exposure to yet unknown, environmental trigger(s). Environmental factors linked with susceptibility to CD include smoking and some intestinal infections. Diet, certain drugs, geography, social status, stress, enteric microbiota, and intestinal permeability are also considered potential risk factors.16

There is a geographical pattern to the worldwide prevalence of CD. Increasing rates at higher latitudes have been linked to lower cutaneous vitamin D (vD) synthesis in Northern Europe17 and North America.17, 18 There is a strong negative correlation between the frequency of CD and exposure to sunlight, as represented by the distance from the equator.19 Moreover, vD deficiency is more common in both adult and pediatric-onset IBD, especially CD.19, 20 Higher circulating levels of vD were recently shown to be protective against the risk for CD.21 Few studies have directly examined the effect of vD supplementation on CD activity.22 In one recent study, CD patients receiving 1200 IU daily of vitamin D3 had a lower relapse rate compared with those treated with placebo.23

The impact of vD on gut homeostasis has been corroborated by studies in experimental animals. VDR-deficient mice develop lethal enterocolitis24 and CYP27B1 knockout mice are more susceptible to colitis.25 Moreover, 1,25D (hormonal form of vD) supplementation has been shown to abrogate experimental colitis.26, 27

vD regulates adaptive immunity and has inhibitory effects on Th128, 29, 30 and Th17 pathways.28, 29, 30, 31, 32 vD increases microbial cell killing by inducing autophagy and stimulating the production of antimicrobial peptides,28 two key processes in which NOD2 also has a role.1, 2, 11, 12 The importance of vD on innate immunity was recently emphasized by our discovery of its capacity to directly induce NOD2 gene expression, the most common susceptibility gene for CD.12 The diverse roles of vD in immune regulation, along with the epidemiological studies cited above, have led to the hypothesis that vD deficiency may be a key environmental risk factor for CD.31 VD deficiency may be associated with suboptimal NOD2 expression that could result in impaired immune response to microbial activators. We therefore investigated the effect of vD on immune responses induced by Toll-like receptor (TLR) and NOD2 ligation and whether vD-induced NOD2 has the ability to modulate TLR-induced cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) from CD patients. The effect of vD was also assessed using immune cells from patients with UC and from healthy individuals. The influence of NOD2 mutations on the effects of vD was also examined. In order to determine the effects of vD on cytokine gene expression and some of the downstream signaling molecules involved, we employed the THP-1 cell line.


A total of 113 samples were obtained from 96 patients with an established diagnosis of CD. Details about the characteristics of their disease are shown in Table 1. Over half of the cohort had pediatric-onset disease (A1). The majority had ileocolonic involvement and a mucosal inflammatory disease phenotype. However, about 25% had a more severe disease phenotype, with either a stricturing or a penetrating/fistulizing behavior. About one-third had significant perianal involvement, with either abscess or fistula formation. Circulating 25(OH)D levels were sufficient (>75 nmol l−1) in less than half (43.5%). Thus, despite the fact that 35% of patients were supplemented with vD at the time of blood draw, the majority of the cohort had vD insufficiency or deficiency. Among those not taking supplementation, the proportion of patients having inadequate levels of 25(OH)D was 63.7%. Among the UC patients recruited, the prevalence of vD insufficiency and deficiency was similar (Table 1).

Table 1 Description of the IBD patients and controls studied

Pattern recognition receptor (PRR)-induced cytokine secretion in PBMCs from CD patients and controls

We first examined the array of CD PBMC cytokine induction in response to PRR stimulation (Figure 1a). Unstimulated cells showed very low baseline cytokine secretion. IL-12/IL-23p40 and IL-10 were induced by stimulation of each PRR ligand alone. TNF-α release was increased by all TLR ligands, but not by NOD2 stimulation. Only TLR4 (lipopolysaccharide (LPS)) and TLR7/8 (R848) stimulation resulted in increased IL-23 secretion. Flagellin, initially employed to stimulate TLR5, only resulted in minimal levels of the cytokines analyzed (data not shown). In order to simulate in vivo microbial triggering of multiple PRR, cells were stimulated with two TLR ligands (LPS+R848) or by the combination of NOD2 and TLR activation (MDP+LPS and MDP+LPS+R848). All cytokines were increased by simultaneous stimulation with two ligands compared with single receptor triggering (Figure 1a). High levels of IL-12/IL-23p40 and IL-23 were measured when TLR4 and TLR7/8 were co-stimulated. Stimulation with NOD2 and TLR ligands increased the levels of all cytokines, particularly TNF-α and IL-10. The pattern of cytokine production by control PBMCs was similar to that observed using CD PBMCs (Figure 1b). However, control PBMCs secreted lower amounts of TNF-α, IL-12/IL-23p40, and IL-23 compared with those from CD patients when stimulated with two or more ligands.

Figure 1
figure 1

Pattern-recognition receptor-induced cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from Crohn’s disease (CD) patients (a) and controls (b). PBMCs were left untreated non-stimulated (NS) or stimulated with the indicated ligands for 24 h. *P<0.05 compared with paired NS samples, #P<0.05 compared with paired stimulated samples in the absence of muramyl dipeptide (MDP), and ϕP<0.05 compared with values from CD patients stimulated using the same ligands. Data are the median of 7–25 samples for CD and 3–15 for controls.

PowerPoint slide

1,25D decreased TLR-induced cytokine production by PBMCs from CD patients.

1,25D pretreatment decreased the production of TLR2-, TLR4-, and TLR7/8-induced cytokines (Figure 2). IL-12/IL-23p40 levels were reduced by 45–56%, whereas those of IL-23 were reduced by 64–70%. IL-10 was less affected, being decreased by up to 25%. Interestingly, 1,25D did not reduce TLR2-induced IL-10 levels. TNF-α levels were only marginally reduced upon TLR7/8 triggering and slightly decreased by about 25% by 1,25D in cells activated with LPS or PAM3. Cytokine production was more markedly decreased by 1,25D in PBMCs upon simultaneous stimulation with TLR4 and TLR7/8.

Figure 2
figure 2

1,25D decreased Toll-like receptor (TLR)-induced cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. PBMCs from patients with CD were pretreated with vehicle or 1,25D for 20 h. PBMCs were then stimulated with TLR ligands for 24 h. Box and whisker plots: vertical bars are medians and edges of the box are the 75th and 25th percentiles, lines extending from the box represent the 10th and 90th percentiles. Data represent the percentage change in cytokine production induced by 1,25D for 12–24 samples for PAM3 and R848, 26–40 samples for lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and 45–48 for LPS+R848. Differences in cytokine levels were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

1,25D differentially modulated NOD2- and TLR-induced cytokine production of PBMCs from CD patients

The effect of 1,25D on NOD2-induced cytokine secretion by PBMCs was quite divergent from that of TLR. MDP-induced production of IL-23, IL-10, and TNF-α was increased by 1,25D pretreatment, whereas that of IL-12/IL-23p40 was not changed (Figure 3). MDP-induced cytokine levels remained low, consistent with the fact that MDP alone is a weak activator of cytokine production. NOD2 activation can strongly amplify the responses provoked by TLR.9 We therefore examined the effects of 1,25D in the presence of MDP. PBMCs stimulated with NOD2 in addition to TLR4 behaved more like cells stimulated with the former. 1,25D caused a comparable enhancement of TNF-α upon NOD2+TLR4 triggering. IL-23 production was slightly increased. On the other hand, IL-12/IL-23p40 production was inhibited, whereas IL-10 induction was not affected by 1,25D. Addition of NOD2 stimulation to combined TLR4 and TLR7/8 triggering led to a secretion pattern more similar to TLR4+TLR7/8, but the magnitude of inhibition was slightly attenuated overall. 1,25D did not affect TNF-α levels, whereas it decreased the other cytokines by 26–51%. In summary, 1,25D did not change the synergy between MDP and LPS for IL-10 and IL-23, and it enhanced TNF-α while decreasing IL-12/IL-23p40. In the presence of multiple ligands, 1,25D was mainly inhibitory.

Figure 3
figure 3

1,25D differentially modulated nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) and Toll-like receptor (TLR) induced cytokine production in Crohn’s disease (CD). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with CD were pretreated with vehicle or 1,25D for 20 h. PBMCs were then stimulated with NOD2 and TLR ligands for 24 h. Data represent the percentage change in cytokine production induced by 1,25D for 12–23 samples for muramyl dipeptide (MDP), 27–33 samples for MDP+LPS (lipopolysaccharide), and 39–50 samples for MDP+LPS+R848. Differences in cytokine levels were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

Effect of 1,25D on TLR- and NOD2-induced cytokine production by Mo-DCs from CD patients

We next studied the effect of 1,25D on Mo-DCs. Single PRR triggering resulted in very low cytokine levels, precluding the investigation of the effect of 1,25D. Simultaneous activation of TLR4 and TLR7/8 in Mo-DCs resulted in the release of high amounts of cytokines. In addition, IL-12p70 production was significantly induced (Figure 4a). 1,25D reduced levels of IL-12/IL-23p40, TNF-α, and IL-23 induced by LPS and R848, by 63–67%. As seen with PBMCs, IL-10 production by Mo-DCs was less affected by 1,25D (−26%), whereas IL-12p70 production was completely abrogated by 1,25D pretreatment (Figure 4b). 1,25D led to increased production of TNF-α (Figure 4c), IL-10, and IL-23 (Figure 4d) when MDP was also present. The inhibitory effect of 1,25D on IL-12p70 was not changed by 1,25D when NOD2 was also triggered. These data show that, in response to multiple co-stimulations including NOD2, 1,25D led to increased production of IL-10, IL-23, and TNF-α.

Figure 4
figure 4

Effect of 1,25D on Toll-like receptor (TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) induced cytokine production by monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. Effect of 1,25D on TLR-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-12/IL-23p40 (a) and IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-23 (b) production by Mo-DCs from CD patients. Effect of 1,25D on TNF-α and IL-12/IL-23p40 (c) and IL-10, IL-12p70, and IL-23 (d) production in the presence of TLR and NOD2 activation. Data represent cytokine levels from 26–32 paired samples pretreated with vehicle or 1,25D. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

Influence of NOD2 genotype on 1,25D effect on TLR- and NOD2-induced cytokine production

The NOD2 genotype was available for 65 CD patients. NOD2 mutations were identified in 23 patients (35.4%): 7 for SNP-8 (R702W), 8 for SNP-12 (G908R), and 8 for SNP-13 (1007 fs). One each was homozygous for R702W and 1007 fs. Another patient carried a double mutation (R702W/1007 fs). In comparison, NOD2 mutations were found in only one UC patient (out of 10) and in none of the healthy individuals (out of nine). The effect of NOD2 mutations on 1,25D modulation of cytokine release was analyzed using cells from CD patients. As expected, 1,25D exerted very comparable inhibitory effects on cytokine production by PBMCs induced by TLR ligands in patients having NOD2 wt and those carrying one NOD2 mutated allele (data not shown). In response to NOD2-dependent signaling, PBMCs from patients heterozygous for NOD2 had blunted TNF-α and IL-10 responses when stimulated with MDP+LPS in the presence of 1,25D, although the difference did not reach significance (Figure 5a). IL-23 production by PBMCs was induced in only half of the patients heterozygous for NOD2, whereas IL-12p40 was decreased in those patients (Figure 5a). We then analyzed the effect of the different mutations on response. Patients heterozygous for the 1007 fs mutation had a decreased response compared with those bearing the G908R or the R702W mutations (Supplementary Figure S1 online). When PBMCs were stimulated by MDP+LPS+R848, 1,25D similarly decreased IL-10, IL-23, and IL-12p40 in patients heterozygous for NOD2 and in those bearing NOD2 wt (Figure 5b). Cells from R702W/1007 fs and R702W/R702W patients had a response similar to those heterozygous for NOD2. The situation was quite different for the patient homozygous for the 1007 fs mutation, whose cells completely lacked any response to MDP.

Figure 5
figure 5

Influence of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) genotype on the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production in Crohn’s disease. (a) Influence of NOD2 genotype on the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by co-activation of NOD2 and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (n=12–14 NOD2 wt and 12–15 heterozygous patients). (b) Influence of NOD2 genotype on the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by co-activation of NOD2, TLR4, and TLR7/8 in PBMCs (n=26–32 NOD2 wt and 13–15 heterozygous patients). (c) Influence of NOD2 genotype on the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production by monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs). (n=15–18 NOD2 wt, 10–12 heterozygous, and 2 homozygous patients) WT: NOD2 wild type, He: heterozygous NOD2, Ho: homozygous for 1007 fs mutation. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

The effect of 1,25D was also comparable for Mo-DCs from patients with NOD2 wt and those heterozygous for NOD2. As Mo-DCs could be generated only when the cell number was sufficient, fewer samples were available than for PBMCs. The effect of carrying different mutated alleles on Mo-DCs was essentially the same as for PBMCs, as only cells from the patient harboring the 1007 fs/1007 fs genotype displayed a different response to 1,25D in the presence of MDP (Figure 5c). In this case, the effect of 1,25D in the presence of MDP was very similar to the effect observed with TLR agonists alone. In summary, Mo-DCs from patients heterozygous for NOD2 responded to 1,25D similarly to those without mutations.

Effect of 1,25D on TLR- and NOD2-induced cytokine production in patients with CD, UC, and in controls

We examined whether 1,25D exerted similar immunomodulatory effects in cells from patients with UC and in those from healthy individuals. The effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by MDP+LPS was comparable between CD patients bearing NOD2 wt, UC patients, and control individuals (Figure 6a). When PBMCs from CD patients without NOD2 polymorphisms and from UC patients were stimulated with MDP+LPS+R848, 1,25D also exerted similar effects on cytokine production (Figure 6b). The effect of 1,25D on PBMCs from control individuals was more variable. Globally, 1,25D was less inhibitory in control cells. IL-23 and IL-12p40 production was not affected in controls, whereas it was decreased in most patients with CD and UC. TNF-α production was unchanged in the three groups, but there was an increased response in controls compared with CD patients.

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of 1,25D on Toll-like receptor (TLR) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) induced cytokine production in Crohn’s disease patients bearing wild-type NOD2 (CDwt), ulcerative colitis (UC), and controls. (a) Effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by co-activation of NOD2 and TLR4 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CDwt, UC, and controls (n=7 UC and 7–9 controls). (b) Effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by co-activation of NOD2, TLR4, and TLR7/8 in PBMCs from CDwt, UC, and controls. (n=9–12 UC and 10–13 controls). (c) Effect of 1,25D on cytokine production induced by co-activation of NOD2, TLR4, and TLR7/8 in monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) from CDwt, UC, and controls (n=11–12 UC and 11–12 controls). *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

In Mo-DCs, there was no difference between groups on the basis of analysis of variance, although cells from control individuals tended to display a higher percentage increase in production following 1,25D treatment. This apparent higher response is not caused by higher levels of cytokine in controls, as cytokine levels in cells stimulated after 1,25D pretreatment were not higher in the media from Mo-DCs from control individuals (Figures 7a and b). However, Mo-DCs from controls produced lower cytokine levels when stimulated with MDP+LPS+R848 in the absence of 1,25D. This was particularly the case for TNF-α (Figure 7a) and IL-23 (Figure 7b).

Figure 7
figure 7

Cytokine levels in supernatants of paired monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) stimulated with nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2), Toll-like receptor (TLR)4, and TLR7/8 ligands following pretreatment with vehicle or 1,25D. (a) TNF-α and IL-12p40. (b) IL-23, IL-10, and IL-12p70. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, and ***P<0.001 compared with paired untreated samples.

PowerPoint slide

Effect of 1,25D on cytokine gene expression and NF-κB downstream signaling

The mechanisms involved in vD-induced alterations in cytokine production were first investigated by examining IκB-α using patient PBMCs and Mo-DCs by western blot (Figure 8). 1,25D increased basal IκB-α levels. However, upon stimulation with MDP+LPS+R848, IκB-α degradation was induced irrespective of VD exposure. In addition, 1,25D increased p-ERK phosphorylation levels in PBMCs but not in Mo-DCs.

Figure 8
figure 8

Effect of 1,25D on IκB-α and p-ERK expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DCs) in Crohn’s disease patients. PBMCs and Mo-DCs were treated with 40 and 15 nM 1,25D, respectively, for 20 h followed by treatment with muramyl dipeptide (MDP) (5 μg ml−1), lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (100 ng ml−1), and R848 (2 μg ml−1) for the indicated times. Cells were lysed and western blot analyses were performed, using anti-IκB-α, p-ERK, and β-actin antibodies. Representative western blots from 3 PBMC and 2 Mo-DC experiments are shown.

PowerPoint slide

Further investigation of the mechanisms involved in cytokine modulation by 1,25D vD was not feasible because of the limited number of cells available in a finite group of IBD patients. Therefore, in order to examine the signaling pathways involved, we determined the quantitative gene expression profiles of undifferentiated THP-1 cells under similar activation protocols. We found that gene expression of NOD2 and TNF-α was enhanced by vD in the presence of MDP alone, or in combination with TLR ligands (Supplementary Figure S2). In terms of downstream effector molecules, we also employed the THP-1 cell line to examine NF-κB signaling. As shown in Supplementary Figure S3, 1,25D with TLR activation enhanced NF-κB gene expression.

Correlation between the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production and circulating 25(OH)D

Correlation analysis was performed for all cytokines following stimulation with LPS+R848, MDP+LPS, and MDP+LPS+R848 in PBMCs and with MDP+LPS+R848 in Mo-DCs. The only data approaching statistical significance were for LPS+R848- and MDP+LPS+R848-induced TNF-α production (r=0.26, P=0.117, and r=0.36, P=0.061, respectively) (Supplementary Figure S4).


CD is characterized by chronic inflammation, primarily involving Th1 and Th17 cytokines.1, 2 There is growing evidence that impaired innate immune response has a key role in the pathogenesis of CD.13, 14, 15, 32, 33 Loss of tolerance to gut microorganisms is believed to have a role in the pathogenesis of CD, and genome-wide association studies have identified several susceptibility genes implicated in defective microbial recognition.1, 5, 6

Numerous studies confirm that 1,25D enhances the innate immune response, whereas it exerts an inhibitory action on the adaptive immune system.28, 29 Notably, 1,25D was reported to have inhibitory effect on Th129, 30 and Th17 pathways,29, 34, 35 while promoting Th2 and Treg phenotypes.29 The antimicrobial actions of 1,25D are mediated via induction of the antimicrobial peptides β-defensin2 and cathelicidin and that of PRR NOD2,12, 28 key factors implicated in the induction of autophagy.13, 14, 15, 36

Epidemiological data implicate low vD levels with several autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders.37, 38 Several lines of evidence support vD deficiency as an environmental risk factor for developing CD,31 including the North–South gradient of incidence and prevalence17, 18 and the presence of low serum concentrations of vD in many IBD patients. As well, there is an inverse correlation between elevated vD concentrations and risk for CD.21 Moreover, vD supplementation was observed to reduce disease activity in patients with CD,23 as well as ameliorate experimental models of IBD.26, 27 In this study, we did not find any correlation between the effect of 1,25D on cytokine production and the patients’ circulating 25(OH)D level. However, the patients’ PBMCs were tested in vitro, removed from the patients’ circulating milieu. Other factors may explain this observation. vD-sufficient and -deficient patients could have different cytokine responses at lower doses of 1,25D, but this was not specifically assessed in this study. It is also possible that more patients are necessary to assess the effect of patients’ 25(OH)D levels on the regulation of cytokine production by 1,25D.

In this study, we examined the effect of 1,25D on TLR- and NOD2-induced cytokine responses in CD patients. 1,25D decreased TLR-induced cytokine secretion in CD, in line with previous studies in the unaffected general population.39, 40 This is also in accordance with decreased LPS-induced TNF production by a vD analog in PBMCs from patients with CD.41

The functional data presented here complement our recent discovery of NOD2 gene induction by 1,25D.12 In agreement with the expectation that NOD2 function is increased by vD, we showed that pretreatment with 1,25D resulted in enhanced MDP-induced TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-23 production. On the other hand, IL-12/IL-23p40 release was decreased by 1,25D. Confrontation in vivo with bacteria will most likely result in simultaneous triggering of multiple PRR, potentially for sustained periods of time. Therefore, our in vitro data cannot be extrapolated to the situation in vivo. Cooperation between PRRs is required to mount an efficient innate response, to afford protection against pathogens.42 Cells were thus stimulated with MDP in association with one and two TLR ligands. The effect of 1,25D in this context was more complex. 1,25D enhanced cytokine production in Mo-DCs and in PBMCs stimulated with NOD2 and TLR4 ligands, whereas it was inhibitory toward PBMCs stimulated with MDP+LPS+R848. These effects were not specific to CD, as similar responses were observed in patients with UC and in healthy individuals.

How NOD2 mutations predispose to CD is still uncertain. A decreased amount of MDP-induced cytokines in PBMCs and monocytes from patients with NOD2 mutations was documented in several studies.9, 43, 44, 45 Synergy between TLR and NOD2 is also defective in patients carrying mutated NOD2 alleles.9, 44, 46 Although most functional studies aiming at unraveling the role of NOD2 in CD pathogenesis focus on homozygous carrier of the NOD2 1007 fs frameshift mutation, this genotype in rarely encountered, representing <4% of CD patients.47 Studies using cells from CD patients with heterozygous NOD2 genotype generally observed a response similar to that of wild-type patients.43, 44 Specific differences were sometimes observed, such as decreased MDP-induced IL-10 and increased TNF release by monocytes.45 Individuals homozygous for R702W and G908R and compound heterozygous have an intermediate response to MDP.9, 43 We observed a loss of NOD2 function with low concentrations of MDP, whereas at higher concentrations MDP induced a response in compound heterozygotes. However, no response was seen in a homozygous carrier of the NOD2 1007 fs mutation, which may be indicative of a decreased sensitivity to MDP rather than a loss of function.9, 43 Additional studies using adherent-invasive Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium in monocytes and Mo-DCs from CD also pointed toward NOD2 loss of function in individuals carrying the 1007 fs/1007 fs genotype.48, 49

Our results are in line with previous reports showing that patients homozygous for the 1007 fs mutation are unresponsive to MDP and 1,25D. Response of PBMCs and Mo-DCs to 1,25D and MDP in patients heterozygous for NOD2 mutations was similar to that of cells from wild-type patients. The leading hypothesis concerning CD pathogenesis implicates defective innate immune function in bacterial processing and clearance, resulting in bacterial persistence and mucosal inflammation. Mutations in NOD2 confer an increased susceptibility to CD. Our data raise the possibility that patients who are not homozygous for 1007 fs might benefit from 1,25D as well as those having a deficient innate response without carrying NOD2 mutations.33 However, well-designed clinical trials would be needed to properly evaluate this possibility.

The extensive cross-talk between NOD2 and TLR has an important role both in host defense against microbial infection and in the development of autoimmunity. In the present study, we examined the effect of 1,25D on this cross-talk, under different TLR activation protocols. In addition, we compared response in PBMCs and Mo-DCs from CD patients. The effect of 1,25D on TLR-induced cytokines was clearly inhibitory, particularly toward the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-12/IL-23p40 and IL-23. 1,25D enhanced MDP-cytokine production, except IL-12/IL-23p40, which was inhibited. The effect on the interaction between NOD2 and TLR is complex and dependent on the context of activation and the cell type studied. On co-activation, the effect of 1,25D was dependent on the activated TLR. Response to MDP+LPS was considerably increased by 1,25D. In contrast, decreased responses were observed upon stimulation via MDP+LPS+R848 in PBMCs. The effect is not solely related to the presence of R848, as PBMCs stimulated with MDP+PAM3 and MDP+R848 also showed this enhancing effect of 1,25D on NOD2+TLR synergy (data not shown). It is tempting to speculate that 1,25D may differently regulate strong signals induced by combined TLR stimulation and those provided by single TLR ligation. Further experiments are needed to explore this hypothesis.

In Mo-DCs, 1,25D enhanced MDP+LPS+R848 cytokine responses. The differences between PBMCs and Mo-DCs could be caused by dissimilarity in the expression levels of PRR and in signal transduction, different responses to 1,25D, or the presence of multiple cell types in PBMCs. Alternatively, it could reflect the fact that Mo-DCs are specialized pro-inflammatory dendritic cells more capable of mounting an effective cytokine response against microbes. The identification of the signaling pathways responsible for this difference could not be achieved because of the limited number of cells isolated from patients in this study. However, we observed that 1,25D resulted in upregulated levels of phosphorylated ERK in PBMCs but not in Mo-DCs. On the other hand, the modulation of IκB-α expression by 1,25D was similar in both cell types.

NOD2 mutations are well established as an important genetic risk factor, but are not sufficient to cause CD. It is believed that the presence of other susceptibility alleles in concert with environmental factors such as vD insufficiency can participate in the initiation and perpetuation of CD. Defective innate immunity is suspected to underlie CD pathogenesis, and 1,25D has the potential to increase response to NOD2 stimulation. Such a therapeutic intervention could be of potential benefit to patients, with the exception of those homozygous for 1007 fs NOD2. However, properly conducted clinical trials would be needed prior to recommending that vD supplementation become a therapeutic intervention for CD.


Patients, isolation of PBMCs, and generation of Mo-DCs. CD and UC patients were recruited at the IBD clinic at the McGill University Health Center. Healthy controls consisted of age- and gender-matched individuals without immune-mediated gastrointestinal or other autoimmune disorders. Informed consent was obtained as per protocol approved by the McGill University Human Subjects Research Review Committee. Patients were classified as vD sufficient (25(OH)D>75 nmol l−1), insufficient (25(OH)D<75 and >50 nmol l−1), or deficient (25(OH)D<50 nmol l−1). PBMCs were isolated from heparinized venous blood by using density-gradient centrifugation over Ficoll-Paque PLUS (GE Healthcare, Baie d’Urfe, QC, Canada) and plated at a concentration of 3 × 106 cells ml−1. Monocytes were isolated using CD14 microbeads, MS columns, and the VarioMACS Separation System (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA). Immature Mo-DCs were generated by culturing isolated monocytes in the presence of IL-4 (500 U ml−1, Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (800 U ml−1, Peprotech) for 6 days. On day 3, half of the medium was replaced with fresh culture medium. Day 6 Mo-DCs were plated at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells ml−1. In cases in which insufficient cell numbers were isolated, a second blood draw was organized in order to complete all experimental conditions for all recruited cases.

Cell culture and stimulation. On the basis of results from pilot experiments, PBMCs were incubated with 40 nM 1,25-vD (1,25D) or vehicle for 20 h. The cells were then stimulated with the following PRR agonists for 20 h: LPS (100 ng ml−1, from E. coli 026:B6), Pam3CSK4 (2 μg ml−1), R848 (2 μg ml−1), and MDP (5 μg ml−1), all from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA). At the end of each culture period, supernatants were collected and stored at −70 °C. Vehicle or 1,25D (15 nM) was added to Mo-DCs in the presence of IL-4 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor for 20 h. Cells were stimulated as described above and supernatants were collected after 24 h for cytokine measurements.

Measurement of cytokines in culture supernatants. Levels of TNF-α, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40, and IL-12p70 were measured in the supernatants using ELISA kits (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. IL-23 levels were measured with ELISA kits from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA).

Genotyping. DNA was isolated from whole blood using the Puregene isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Genotyping was carried out at the McGill University-Genome Quebec Innovation Center (MUG-QIC) using the sequenom platform as previously described.50

Gene expression profiles in THP-1 cells. RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis, and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) were performed using standard techniques. The primers used are detailed in Supplementary Table S1.

Statistics. Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism, version 5.03 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). All data are presented as median. The statistical significance of the differences induced by 1,25D was determined using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. The difference between groups was determined using the Mann–Whitney test. The statistical significance of the differences between CD, UC, and control patients was assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test. Correlation between 1,25D effect and serum 25(OH)D levels was tested with the Pearson correlation coefficient. A P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.