Donor type, in addition to transplantation in chronic phase and myeloablative conditioning, influence transplant survival for patients with advanced chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1


  1. 1

    Jiang H, Xu LP, Liu DH, Liu KY, Chen SS, Jiang B et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment compared with TKI treatment alone in CML blast crisis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: 1146–1154.

  2. 2

    Palandri F, Castagnetti F, Alimena G, Testoni N, Breccia M, Luatti S et al. The long-term durability of cytogenetic responses in patients with accelerated phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib 600 mg: the GIMEMA CML Working Party experience after a 7-year follow-up. Haematologica 2009; 94: 205–212.

  3. 3

    Khoury HJ, Kukreja M, Goldman JM, Wang T, Halter J, Arora M et al. Prognostic factors for outcomes in allogeneic transplantation for CML in the imatinib era: a CIBMTR analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 810–816.

  4. 4

    Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Ciceri F, Mohty M, Nagler A . Definition of GvHD-free, relapse-free survival for registry-based studies: an ALWP-EBMT analysis on patients with AML in remission. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016; 51: 610–611.

  5. 5

    Giralt S, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Bacigalupo A, Horowitz M, Pasquini M et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen workshop: defining the dose spectrum. Report of a workshop convened by the center for international blood and marrow transplant research. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 367–369.

  6. 6

    Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 6041–6051.

  7. 7

    Mahon FX, Rea D, Guilhot J, Guilhot F, Huguet F, Nicolini F et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 1029–1035.

  8. 8

    Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H et al WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, vol.2. 2008.

  9. 9

    Crawley C, Szydlo R, Lalancette M, Bacigalupo A, Lange A, Brune M et al. Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT. Blood 2005; 106: 2969–2976.

  10. 10

    Kanate AS, Mussetti A, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Ahn KW, DiGilio A, Beitinjaneh A et al. Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors vs HLA-matched unrelated donors. Blood 2016; 127: 938–947.

  11. 11

    Ciurea SO, Zhang MJ, Bacigalupo AA, Bashey A, Appelbaum FR, Aljitawi OS et al. Haploidentical transplant with posttransplant cyclophosphamide vs matched unrelated donor transplant for acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 2015; 126: 1033–1040.

  12. 12

    Kebriaei P, Detry MA, Giralt S, Carrasco-Yalan A, Anagnostopoulos A, Couriel D et al. Long-term follow-up of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 2007; 110: 3456–3462.

  13. 13

    Blaise D, Furst S, Crocchiolo R, El-Cheikh J, Granata A, Harbi S et al. Haploidentical T cell-replete transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for patients in or above the sixth decade of age compared with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from an human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22: 119–124.

  14. 14

    Di Stasi A, Milton DR, Poon LM, Hamdi A, Rondon G, Chen J et al. Similar transplantation outcomes for acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients with haploidentical versus 10/10 human leukocyte antigen-matched unrelated and related donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 1975–1981.

  15. 15

    Raiola AM, Dominietto A, di Grazia C, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, Ibatici A et al. Unmanipulated haploidentical transplants compared with other alternative donors and matched sibling grafts. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 1573–1579.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to S O Ciurea.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Author contributions

P Kongtim collected data and wrote the manuscript; KA collected data, reviewed and approved the manuscript; DRM analyzed data, interpreted the results, reviewed and approved the manuscript; RR, AJ, JC, GR contributed with data collection, reviewed and approved the manuscript; SA, P Kebriaei, CMH, IK, EJ, OB, UP, JC, HMK, REC contributed with treatment of patients, reviewed and approved the manuscript; SOC contributed with study design, data collection and interpretation, and manuscript writing.

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Leukemia website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kongtim, P., Adekola, K., Milton, D. et al. Donor type, in addition to transplantation in chronic phase and myeloablative conditioning, influence transplant survival for patients with advanced chronic myeloid leukemia in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Leukemia 31, 1654–1657 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading