Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative leukemia protein activation directly induces fibrocyte differentiation to cause myelofibrosis

A Correction to this article was published on 19 September 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) may be caused by various pathogenic mechanisms such as elevation in circulating cytokine levels, cellular interactions and genetic mutations. However, the underlying mechanism of MF still remains unknown. Recent studies have revealed that fibrocytes, the spindle-shaped fibroblast-like hematopoietic cells, and the thrombopoietin (TPO)/myeloproliferative leukemia protein (MPL; TPO receptor) signaling pathway play a certain role in the development of MF. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between fibrocytes and MPL activation. We showed that TPO or a TPO receptor agonist directly induces fibrocyte differentiation using murine fibrocyte cell lines and a murine MF model. Conversely, elimination of macrophages expressing MPL by clodronate liposomes reversed the MF phenotype of the murine model, suggesting that fibrocyte differentiation induced by MPL activation contributes to the progression of MF. Furthermore, we revealed that SLAMF7high MPLhigh monocytes in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were possible fibrocyte precursors and that these cells increased in number in MF patients not treated with ruxolitinib. Our findings confirmed a link between fibrocytes and the TPO/MPL signaling pathway, which could result in a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of MF and lead to the development of novel therapeutic interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 19 September 2018

    Owing to the insufficient specificity of the anti-myeloproliferative leukemia protein (MPL) antibody in the original version of this Article, Figure 6 and parts of Figures 2a, 4e, and 5a do not represent the correct information. The corrected version of Figure 6 is shown below and those of Figures 2a, 4e, and 5a are shown in the supplemental information.

References

  1. Tefferi A, Lasho TL, Finke CM, Knudson RA, Ketterling R, Hanson CH et al. CALR vs JAK2 vs MPL-mutated or triple-negative myelofibrosis: clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1472–1477.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hitchcock IS, Kaushansky K . Thrombopoietin from beginning to end. Br J Haematol 2014; 165: 259–268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ku H, Yonemura Y, Kaushansky K, Ogawa M . Thrombopoietin, the ligand for the Mpl receptor, synergizes with steel factor and other early acting cytokines in supporting proliferation of primitive hematopoietic progenitors of mice. Blood 1996; 87: 4544–4551.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yan XQ, Lacey D, Fletcher F, Hartley C, McElroy P, Sun Y et al. Chronic exposure to retroviral vector encoded MGDF (mpl-ligand) induces lineage-specific growth and differentiation of megakaryocytes in mice. Blood 1995; 86: 4025–4033.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Villeval JL, Cohen-Solal K, Tulliez M, Giraudier S, Guichard J, Burstein SA et al. High thrombopoietin production by hematopoietic cells induces a fatal myeloproliferative syndrome in mice. Blood 1997; 90: 4369–4383.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pikman Y, Lee BH, Mercher T, McDowell E, Ebert BL, Gozo M et al. MPLW515L is a novel somatic activating mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. PLoS Med 2006; 3: e270.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuter DJ, Mufti GJ, Bain BJ, Hasserjian RP, Davis W, Rutstein M . Evaluation of bone marrow reticulin formation in chronic immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with romiplostim. Blood 2009; 114: 3748–3756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chagraoui H, Komura E, Tulliez M, Giraudier S, Vainchenker W, Wendling F . Prominent role of TGF-beta 1 in thrombopoietin-induced myelofibrosis in mice. Blood 2002; 100: 3495–3503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ciurea SO, Merchant D, Mahmud N, Ishii T, Zhao Y, Hu W et al. Pivotal contributions of megakaryocytes to the biology of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Blood 2007; 110: 986–993.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pilling D, Buckley CD, Salmon M, Gomer RH . Inhibition of fibrocyte differentiation by serum amyloid P. J Immunol 2003; 171: 5537–5546.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verstovsek S, Manshouri T, Pilling D, Bueso-Ramos CE, Newberry KJ, Prijic S et al. Role of neoplastic monocyte-derived fibrocytes in primary myelofibrosis. J Exp Med 2016; 213: 1723–1740.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bucala R, Spiegel LA, Chesney J, Hogan M, Cerami A . Circulating fibrocytes define a new leukocyte subpopulation that mediates tissue repair. Mol Med 1994; 1: 71–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Abe R, Donnelly SC, Peng T, Bucala R, Metz CN . Peripheral blood fibrocytes: differentiation pathway and migration to wound sites. J Immunol 2001; 166: 7556–7562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pilling D, Fan T, Huang D, Kaul B, Gomer RH . Identification of markers that distinguish monocyte-derived fibrocytes from monocytes, macrophages, and fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e7475.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mehrad B, Strieter RM . Fibrocytes and the pathogenesis of diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2012; 5: S22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keeley EC, Mehrad B, Strieter RM . The role of fibrocytes in fibrotic diseases of the lungs and heart. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2011; 4: 2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kisseleva T, Uchinami H, Feirt N, Quintana-Bustamante O, Segovia JC, Schwabe RF et al. Bone marrow-derived fibrocytes participate in pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. J Hepatol 2006; 45: 429–438.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reich B, Schmidbauer K, Rodriguez Gomez M, Johannes Hermann F, Gobel N, Bruhl H et al. Fibrocytes develop outside the kidney but contribute to renal fibrosis in a mouse model. Kidney Int 2013; 84: 78–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reilkoff RA, Bucala R, Herzog EL . Fibrocytes: emerging effector cells in chronic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11: 427–435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yanai N, Suzuki M, Obinata M . Hepatocyte cell lines established from transgenic mice harboring temperature-sensitive simian virus 40 large T-antigen gene. Exp Cell Res 1991; 197: 50–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Obinata M . Conditionally immortalized cell lines with differentiated functions established from temperature-sensitive T-antigen transgenic mice. Genes Cells 1997; 2: 235–244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Crawford JR, Pilling D, Gomer RH . Improved serum-free culture conditions for spleen-derived murine fibrocytes. J Immunol Methods 2010; 363: 9–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pilling D, Vakil V, Gomer RH . Improved serum-free culture conditions for the differentiation of human and murine fibrocytes. J Immunol Methods 2009; 351: 62–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thiele J, Kvasnicka HM, Facchetti F, Franco V, van der Walt J, Orazi A . European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis and assessment of cellularity. Haematologica 2005; 90: 1128–1132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Quintas-Cardama A, Vaddi K, Liu P, Manshouri T, Li J, Scherle PA et al. Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Blood 2010; 115: 3109–3117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sangkhae V, Etheridge SL, Kaushansky K, Hitchcock IS . The thrombopoietin receptor, MPL, is critical for development of a JAK2V617F-induced myeloproliferative neoplasm. Blood 2014; 124: 3956–3963.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang X, Haylock D, Hu CS, Kowalczyk W, Jiang T, Qiu J et al. A thrombopoietin receptor antagonist is capable of depleting myelofibrosis hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 2016; 127: 3398–3409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ramos P, Casu C, Gardenghi S, Breda L, Crielaard BJ, Guy E et al. Macrophages support pathological erythropoiesis in polycythemia vera and beta-thalassemia. Nat Med 2013; 19: 437–445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashimoto M, Nasser H, Bhuyan F, Kuse N, Satou Y, Harada S et al. Fibrocytes differ from macrophages but can be infected with HIV-1. J Immunol 2015; 195: 4341–4350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zahr AA, Salama ME, Carreau N, Tremblay D, Verstovsek S, Mesa R et al. Bone marrow fibrosis in myelofibrosis: pathogenesis, prognosis and targeted strategies. Haematologica 2016; 101: 660–671.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mascarenhas J, Li T, Sandy L, Newsom C, Petersen B, Godbold J et al. Anti-transforming growth factor-beta therapy in patients with myelofibrosis. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 55: 450–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mesa RA, Tefferi A, Elliott MA, Hoagland HC, Call TG, Schroeder GS et al. A phase II trial of pirfenidone (5-methyl-1-phenyl-2-[1H]-pyridone), a novel anti-fibrosing agent, in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol 2001; 114: 111–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Crawford JR, Pilling D, Gomer RH . FcgammaRI mediates serum amyloid P inhibition of fibrocyte differentiation. J Leukoc Biol 2012; 92: 699–711.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Duffield JS, Lupher ML Jr . PRM-151 (recombinant human serum amyloid P/pentraxin 2) for the treatment of fibrosis. Drug News Perspect 2010; 23: 305–315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Veillette A, Guo H . CS1, a SLAM family receptor involved in immune regulation, is a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2013; 88: 168–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jakubowiak A, Offidani M, Pegourie B, De La Rubia J, Garderet L, Laribi K et al. Randomized phase 2 study: elotuzumab plus bortezomib/dexamethasone vs bortezomib/dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory MM. Blood 2016; 127: 2833–2840.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang JC, Chen C, Lou LH, Mora M . Blood thrombopoietin, IL-6 and IL-11 levels in patients with agnogenic myeloid metaplasia. Leukemia 1997; 11: 1827–1832.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cerutti A, Custodi P, Duranti M, Noris P, Balduini CL . Thrombopoietin levels in patients with primary and reactive thrombocytosis. Br J Haematol 1997; 99: 281–284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Maekawa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maekawa, T., Osawa, Y., Izumi, T. et al. Myeloproliferative leukemia protein activation directly induces fibrocyte differentiation to cause myelofibrosis. Leukemia 31, 2709–2716 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.112

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2017.112

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links