A novel t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation fusing FLT3 with GOLGB1: toward myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of FLT3?

A novel t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation fusing FLT3 with GOLGB1: toward myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and rearrangement of FLT3?

According to the 2016 World Health Organization classification, myeloid neoplasms with eosinophilia (MPN-Eo) are associated with genetic abnormalities of genes coding for type III tyrosine kinase (TK) receptors, mainly PDGFRA, PDGFRB and FGFR1, but also JAK2. 1 Beside these translocations, very rare FLT3 gene rearrangements have been reported, which raises the double question of its association with myeloid neoplasms and of its specific targeted therapy. [2][3][4][5][6][7] A new t(3;13)(q13;q12) was found from a case of atypical mixed lymphoid/myeloid neoplasm. This case, diagnosed MPN-Eo, was characterized by the coexistence of bone marrow myeloproliferation with circulating hypereosinophilia and T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in lymph node (Supplementary Results for detailed description). The patient could not benefit from new tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Evolution was fatal in 3 months despite conventional CHOP chemotherapy (Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin and Prednisolone).
Karyotype of tumor cells from lymph nodes and bone marrow revealed a single clonal t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation (Figure 1a, left panel). Absence of FGFR1 gene rearrangement was checked by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and RT-PCR according to methods described by others. 8 BCR-ABL gene translocation, FLT3-ITD and D835 mutation were also absent. FISH walking on both chromosomes 3 and 13 with BAC and fosmid probes showed that the breakpoint was located in a 58.6 kb region encompassing HCLS1 and GOLGB1 on chromosome 3 and in a 65.5 kb region containing the FLT3 locus on chromosome 13 (Figure 1a, right panel).
FLT3 maps to band q12 of chromosome 13 and GOLGB1 to chromosome band 3q13. We hypothesized that this translocation would lead to a fusion transcript. Since the breakpoint region covered 15 out of the 23 exons of the GOLGB1 gene, we hypothesized that GOLGB1 gene could be a fusion partner. FLT3 gene was the only candidate on chromosome 13. A multiplex PCR amplified a specific product located between exons 13 and 15 of GOLGB1 and FLT3 respectively ( Figure 1b). Direct sequencing showed that this 2000 bp PCR product was specific. The rearrangement fused exons 14 of both GOLGB1 and FLT3 genes. Moreover, 36 bp of intron 14 of GOLGB1 were inserted between the two exons 14 of GOLGB1 and FLT3 (Figure 1c). The genomic fragment corresponding to the der(3) contains the 5′sequence of GOLGB1 fused in frame to the 3′ sequence of FLT3 at nucleotide 8841 which corresponds to the beginning of exon 14. Genomic DNA sequencing showed that breakpoints were within GOLGB1 intron 14 and FLT3 exon 14 (not shown). This t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation identifies GOLGB1 as a new partner of FLT3. GOLGB1 encodes for giantin, a golgin subfamily B member 1 and the largest golgi complex-associated protein (372 kD), with numerous coiled-coil regions. GOLGB1-FLT3 protein fused together the three coiled-coil GOLGB1 domains with the split kinase TK domain of FLT3, that could lead to a constitutively multimerized active protein. Alternatively, constitutive TK activation could be due to the loss of the inhibitory juxtamembrane domain of FLT3, as reported for FIP1L1-PDGFRα gene rearrangement. 9 GOLGB1 has been recently reported as a fusion partner with PDGFRB in a t(3;5)(q13;q33) translocation in a male patient with MLN-Eos. 10 PDGFRB has also been reported to be fused with another golgin subfamily member, GOLGA4. 11 The other published FLT3 partners, Accepted article preview online 31 October 2016; advance online publication, 2 December 2016 ETV6 helix-loop-helix and SPTBN1 coiled-coil domains exhibit spontaneous multimerization, at least theoretically for SPTBN1. 4 ETV6-FLT3 fusion protein is indeed oligomerized and is constitutively activated. 12 This emphasizes that, like SPTBN1 and ETV6, golgin family proteins participate in oncogenesis due to their ability to multimerize the TK partner domain.
To date, seven other cases of myeloid neoplasms with FLT3 gene rearrangement have been published (Table 1). Five had an ETV6/FLT3 rearrangement, three of them with MPN-Eo associated with T-cell lymphoma, either peripheral or lymphoblastic, and two with a chronic MPN-Eo. 2,3,5,7 One case has been diagnosed as an atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, but with eosinophilia, and corresponded to a t(2;13;2;21)(p13;q12;q33;q11.2) with SPTBN1/FLT3 gene rearrangement. 4 The last case was diagnosed as an atypical MPN with a B ALL and systemic mastocytosis corresponding to a t(13;13) (q12;q22) for which the FLT3 partner has not been identified. 6 In the t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation described here, the FLT3 breakpoint was located within intron 14 just upstream from the exons coding for the TK domain. FLT3 breakpoints in other published translocations are all located between exon 13 and 15 (Table 1). We also noticed that the FLT3 exon 14 breakpoint was located within an Alu I restriction site and was embedded between non-coding Alu sequences, AluSz and AluJb (Figure 1d). On the other side, the breakpoint in GOLGB1 was also found between two Alu sequences, AluSc and AluS. This led us to look for Alu repeats in the other published partners of FLT3 gene rearrangement, ETV6 and SPTBN1. 4 AluS, AluY sequences were located close to the 5′ end of the ETV6 breakpoint meanwhile AluYa1 sequence was located close to the corresponding 3′ end. For STPBN1, the breakpoint was not precisely located but was reported to be within the intron 14, which is 3 kb long and contains one AluSz sequence. Altogether, this highlights a nonrandom distribution of chromosome breakpoints both for FLT3 and its partners. Alu rich genomic region are known to render the genome sensitive to double-strand DNA breaks, which suggests the existence of a breakpoint cluster region. FLT3 gene rearrangement could thus involve reactivation of ancestral retrotransposon Alu sequences, as reported for BCR and ABL1, resulting in a looped-out chromatin conformation during interphase with double DNA strand breaks. 13 The entire 10 kb GOLGB1-FLT3 cDNA encodes a theoretical protein of 377 kDa. This full length mRNA was retrotranscribed from the lymph node tumor of the patient and the cDNA was cloned into the pcDNA3 eukaryote expression vector. No additional mutations were found after sequencing the whole GOLGB1-FLT3 cDNA. Stable transfection of the GOLGB1-FLT3 pcDNA3 vector was successful in the 32D myeloblastic cell line but failed despite repetitive attempts in the BA/F3 lymphoblastic cell line. Both cell lines were grown in an IL-3-dependent manner. The stably transfected 32D clone, named cl.2, expressed a protein of~350 kDa (Figure 1e right panel). Immunoprecipitation of this protein with an antibody against the N terminal moiety of GOLGB1 was revealed with an antibody against the C-terminal moiety of FLT3 as well as with the 4G10 antibody raised against phosphorylated tyrosine motives (Figure 1e middle and left panel, respectively). Cl.2 cells expressing the GOLGB1-FLT3 fusion protein grew in the absence of IL-3 in contrast to clones expressing vector only and the parental 32D cell line, which died rapidly (Figure 1f). Constitutive phosphorylation of Erk and Akt was increased in these cells in the absence of IL-3 (Figure 1g).
To test if GOLGB1-FLT3 transfected cells were sensitive to targeted TK inhibition, transformed clones were cultured in the presence of four TK inhibitors also known to block FLT3: Imatinib, Midostaurine, Sorafenib and Ponatinib. Transformed cell growth was inhibited in a dose-dependent fashion by Midostaurine, Sorafenib and Ponatinib, but not by Imatinib (Supplementary Figure 1). The GI50s were 3682 nM for Imatinib (vector control, 826.2 nM), 0.85 nM for Ponatinib (vector control 501.5 nM), 0.65 nM for PKC412 (vector control, 23.22 nM). Sensitivity for Sorafenib was so high that GI50s could not be calculated precisely with the range of concentration used (vector control, 112.2 nM).
Therefore, our results on the functional characterization of the fusion protein argue in favor of direct transformation ability by constitutive FLT3 TK activity. Its transformation potential was also evidenced in a mouse model. 14 Most cases, including ours, were diagnosed as MLN-Eos, with a rapid fatal issue in the absence of allogenic bone marrow transplantation. SPTBN1-FLT3-transformed Ba/F3 cells were sensitive to several FLT3 inhibitors. 4 The therapeutic efficacy of FLT3 inhibitor has been described in patients with ETV6-FLT3 positive MLN-Eos. 2,7 In our case, the giantin-FLT3 transformed 32D cells were sensitive to different tyrosine kinase inhibitors, with in particular, a high specific activity for Sorafenib. Other new molecules such as those derived from ibrutinib have been reported as very potent and specific inhibitors of FLT3-ITD (Internal Tandem Duplication) product in FLT3-ITD positive acute myeloid leukemia. 15 These new drugs could also be interesting in case of FLT3 gene rearrangement, as the target is the ATP pocket of FLT3 TK domain.
Altogether, including this new t(3;13)(q13;q12) translocation, MLN-Eos with FLT3 gene rearrangements exhibit close clinical features, similar genetic structures of their translocation with possible involvement of Alu sites, the same three-dimensional organization of the chimeric protein and high sensitivity (at least in vitro) to new TK inhibitor. This highlights the importance of FLT3 gene rearrangements at diagnosis and for adapted therapeutics rand raises the question a subgroup of MLN-Eos specifically associated with FLT3 gene translocation, as suggested by some authors. 2