Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Clinical prevalence (diagnosed cases) of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in the US: estimating the burden on health care

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

References

  1. Wadhera RK, Rajkumar SV . Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a systematic review. Mayo Clinic Proc 2010; 85: 933–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV, Larson DR, Plevak MF, Offord JR et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1362–1369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Landgren O, Katzmann JA, Hsing AW, Pfeiffer RM, Kyle RA, Yeboah ED et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among men in Ghana. Mayo Clinic Proc 2007; 82: 1468–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Therneau TM, Kyle RA, Melton LJ 3rd, Larson DR, Benson JT, Colby CL et al. Incidence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and estimation of duration before first clinical recognition. Mayo Clinic Proc 2012; 87: 1071–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. van de Donk NW, Palumbo A, Johnsen HE, Engelhardt M, Gay F, Gregersen H et al. The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network. Haematologica 2014; 99: 984–996.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Go RS, Gundrum JD, Neuner JM . Determining the clinical significance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a SEER-medicare population analysis. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 2015; 15: 177–186 e174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigurdardottir EE, Turesson I, Lund SH, Lindqvist EK, Mailankody S, Korde N et al. The role of diagnosis and clinical follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on survival in multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol 2015; 1: 168–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 2009; 113: 5412–5417.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waxman AJ, Mink PJ, Devesa SS, Anderson WF, Weiss BM, Kristinsson SY et al. Racial disparities in incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma: a population-based study. Blood 2010; 116: 5501–5506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang H, Chen Y, Li F, Delasalle K, Wang J, Alexanian R et al. Temporal and geographic variations of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia incidence: a large population-based study. Cancer 2012; 118: 3793–3800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwanaga M, Tagawa M, Tsukasaki K, Kamihira S, Tomonaga M . Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: study of 52,802 persons in Nagasaki City, Japan. Mayo Clinic Proc 2007; 82: 1474–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu SP, Minter A, Costello R, Zingone A, Lee CK, Au WY et al. MGUS prevalence in an ethnically Chinese population in Hong Kong. Blood 2013; 121: 2363–2364.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McShane CM, Murray LJ, Landgren O, O'Rorke MA, Korde N, Kunzmann AT et al. Prior autoimmune disease and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014; 23: 332–342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marken S. US Uninsured Rate at 11.4% in Second Quarter 2015. (cited 10 August 2015); Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/184064/uninsured-rate-second-quarter.aspx.

  15. United States Census Bureau Available at http://www.census.gov/last accessed 7 August 2015.

  16. Clinical laboratory fee schedule. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (cited 17 July 2015); Available at http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/ClinicalLabFeeSched/clinlab.htmllast accessed 7 August 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Mayo Clinic Robert D and Patricia E Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery and the Division of Hematology. RSG is a Kern Health Care Delivery Scholar.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R S Go.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Go, R., Swanson, K., Sangaralingham, L. et al. Clinical prevalence (diagnosed cases) of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in the US: estimating the burden on health care. Leukemia 30, 1443–1446 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.336

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.336

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links